本文選題：董事 + 董事義務　； 參考：《沈陽師范大學》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：公司制度已然成為現(xiàn)代企業(yè)的一種重要形式選擇,與公司的快速發(fā)展相比,公司完善的法律制度相對落后�，F(xiàn)代公司的顯著特征是所有權(quán)與經(jīng)營權(quán)的分離,董事處于現(xiàn)代公司管理核心地位,適當擴大董事權(quán)力有利于提高公司經(jīng)營效率,董事權(quán)力的過度擴張,則必然導致權(quán)力濫用和利害相關(guān)人的利益的損害,強化董事的責任和義務已經(jīng)成為公司治理的重要組成部分。為了更好的保護股東、債權(quán)人與利害相關(guān)人的利益,防止董事濫用權(quán)力,應該努力尋求董事權(quán)利與責任的平衡,制定完善的法律來規(guī)范和限制董事職權(quán)與責任履行。新《公司法》較修訂前在董事責任規(guī)定上有了很大進步,但仍然過于薄弱、模糊,缺乏系統(tǒng)性和可操作性,部分領(lǐng)域立法仍屬空白。為了激勵董事的積極性,防止董事濫用權(quán)利,加強對董事責任的研究顯得越來越重要和迫切。本文著重從以下四個方面對公司董事責任問題進行闡述,力求為我國公司立法的相關(guān)改進盡微薄之力。第一部分從公司董事責任的基本理論出發(fā),闡述了董事責任的概念、特征與意義,并對董事責任類型進行了分類梳理。董事的定義、董事與公司之間的關(guān)系,都在一定程度上反映董事、董事職權(quán)與董事責任的關(guān)系,在論述董事責任之前需要先予明確;第二部分尋找公司董事責任的起源。公司所有權(quán)與經(jīng)營權(quán)的分離,董事與公司之間的契約關(guān)系的確立是董事權(quán)利、義務和責任確立的前提和基礎(chǔ),在此基礎(chǔ)上,對董事的義務進行了詳細的論述和分析。了解董事責任的本源必須從董事權(quán)利和義務入手,因此,探討董事責任之前必然要確定董事的權(quán)利義務;第三部分研究董事責任的實現(xiàn)和限制。股東或公司在他們的利益已經(jīng)或?qū)⒈磺址傅那闆r下,可以通過一定的渠道或途徑救濟。為激勵董事為公司的最佳利益行事,符合條件時,應限制或免除董事責任的承擔;第四部分對我國公司董事責任制度的健全與完善提出建議。在分析我國公司董事責任制度存在的問題的基礎(chǔ)上,提出明確董事義務、強化問責機制、確認董事離任義務、增加公司董事和第三人責任、完善董事責任保險和董事責任免除條款等建議。
[Abstract]:Corporate system has become an important form of choice for modern enterprises, compared with the rapid development of the company, the company's perfect legal system is relatively backward.The remarkable characteristic of modern company is the separation of ownership and management right, the director is in the core position of modern company management, the appropriate expansion of director's power is helpful to improve the management efficiency of the company, and the excessive expansion of director's power.It will inevitably lead to abuse of power and damage to the interests of stakeholders. Strengthening the responsibilities and obligations of directors has become an important part of corporate governance.In order to better protect the interests of shareholders, creditors and stakeholders and prevent directors from abusing their power, we should strive to find a balance between directors' rights and responsibilities, and make perfect laws to regulate and restrict the performance of directors' powers and responsibilities.The new Company Law has made great progress in the regulation of directors' liability, but it is still too weak, vague, lack of systematization and maneuverability, and the legislation in some fields is still blank.In order to encourage the enthusiasm of directors and prevent directors from abusing their rights, it is more and more important and urgent to strengthen the research on directors' liability.This paper focuses on the following four aspects of corporate directors liability issues, to try to improve the relevant legislation of China's company to contribute to the meager.The first part expounds the concept, characteristics and significance of directors' liability from the basic theory of directors' responsibility, and classifies the types of directors' liability.The definition of directors and the relationship between directors and companies reflect to a certain extent the relationship between directors' functions and powers and directors' responsibilities. The second part is to find out the origin of directors' responsibilities before discussing directors' responsibilities.The separation of company ownership and management right, the establishment of the contractual relationship between directors and companies is the premise and basis of the establishment of directors' rights, obligations and responsibilities. On this basis, the obligations of directors are discussed and analyzed in detail.To understand the origin of directors' liability, we must start with the directors' rights and obligations, therefore, we must determine the directors' rights and obligations before discussing the directors' liability; the third part studies the realization and limitation of directors' liability.Shareholders or companies can remedy their interests through certain channels or channels if their interests have been or will be infringed.In order to encourage the directors to act in the best interests of the company, we should limit or exempt the directors from taking on the responsibility of directors when they meet the requirements. The fourth part puts forward some suggestions on the perfection and perfection of the system of directors' liability in our country.On the basis of analyzing the problems existing in the system of directors' liability in our country, this paper puts forward that the directors' obligations should be clarified, the accountability mechanism should be strengthened, the obligations of directors should be confirmed, and the responsibilities of directors and third parties should be increased.Improve the director's liability insurance and director's liability exemption clause and other suggestions.
【學位授予單位】：沈陽師范大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D922.291.91

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前8條

1 蔣菲;向燕子;;論美國董事責任保險的發(fā)展與借鑒[J];湖南財經(jīng)高等�？茖W校學報;2009年04期

2 任自力;曹文澤;;論公司董事責任的限制[J];法學家;2007年05期

3 趙旭東;;新《公司法》的突破與創(chuàng)新[J];國家檢察官學院學報;2007年01期

4 張昊;李震東;;論董事責任的豁免機制[J];重慶工商大學學報(社會科學版);2006年04期

5 徐新意;董事責任追究制度研究[J];江蘇工業(yè)學院學報(社會科學版);2005年01期

6 熊瑛;董事的民事責任[J];山西高等學校社會科學學報;2004年10期

7 蔡元慶;董事責任的追究和經(jīng)營判斷的原則[J];現(xiàn)代法學;2002年04期

8 石少俠,胡曉靜,王福友;論公司董事與董事責任[J];吉林大學社會科學學報;1997年05期

相關(guān)碩士學位論文 前10條

1 劉楠;論董事責任的限制與免除[D];華東政法大學;2016年

2 戴菲;論董事對第三人的民事責任[D];首都經(jīng)濟貿(mào)易大學;2015年

3 郭鑫;中國董事責任保險研究[D];華東政法大學;2014年

4 郭晶晶;我國董事責任免除制度研究[D];蘇州大學;2014年

5 程艷;現(xiàn)代公司董事民事責任研究[D];山東大學;2012年

6 王印;公司董事責任研究[D];西南政法大學;2011年

7 杜忠文;公司董事責任制度研究[D];中央民族大學;2010年

8 儲純;我國公司董事義務制度的完善[D];中國政法大學;2010年

9 閆莉;公司董事民事責任制度研究[D];中央民族大學;2010年

10 李裕琢;董事責任研究[D];東北財經(jīng)大學;2007年

，

本文編號：1757590