本文選題：不正當(dāng)競爭 + 非公益必要不干擾�。� 參考：《華中師范大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：電腦挾其雷霆萬鈞、排山倒海般沖擊著社會上每一行業(yè),深入到每一個角落①。隨著計算機技術(shù)的大力發(fā)展和互聯(lián)網(wǎng)時代的快速推進(jìn),使得工業(yè)社會正在大步跨入互聯(lián)網(wǎng)時代�；ヂ�(lián)網(wǎng)時代的到來,給人類社會帶來了諸多的便捷,也在反不正當(dāng)競爭領(lǐng)域給人們帶來了新的挑戰(zhàn)。伴隨著當(dāng)今社會經(jīng)濟的發(fā)展以及科學(xué)技術(shù)的不斷進(jìn)步,在互聯(lián)網(wǎng)領(lǐng)域中產(chǎn)生了許多新形式的網(wǎng)絡(luò)競爭行為。這些基于互聯(lián)網(wǎng)的競爭行為由于其技術(shù)的前瞻性,采取何種方式對該問題進(jìn)行規(guī)制一直以來都是我國司法實務(wù)中急需解決的問題。我們國家現(xiàn)行的《反不正當(dāng)競爭法》實施于二十世紀(jì)九十年初期,其發(fā)布的目的是為市場營造一個公平的競爭環(huán)境,打擊和管控市場中存在的不正當(dāng)競爭行為,從而維護(hù)市場穩(wěn)定,保障消費者的有關(guān)權(quán)益�，F(xiàn)如今在以互聯(lián)網(wǎng)和移動互聯(lián)網(wǎng)為主要載體的互聯(lián)網(wǎng)領(lǐng)域,面對紛繁復(fù)雜的各種企業(yè)的不正當(dāng)競爭行為,法律的局限性也便由之昭顯。由于在實務(wù)當(dāng)中也已經(jīng)證明了用傳統(tǒng)的思維方式和技術(shù)手段不能完全處理好這些糾紛,因此北京市高等法院的石必勝法官在審理百度訴360不正當(dāng)競爭糾紛一案中便順應(yīng)時代的發(fā)展要求提出了非公益必要不干擾原則,以此解決這些新興的訴爭。法律具有固有的滯后性,其在頒布之時即使盡可能的考慮未來社會的經(jīng)濟發(fā)展?fàn)顩r,也不可能把未來社會的所有情況考慮詳盡周到,上個世紀(jì)九十年代頒布的法律未曾預(yù)料到今日互聯(lián)網(wǎng)發(fā)展之迅速,也不會為今天的互聯(lián)網(wǎng)環(huán)境下的爭端提供有效的解決途徑,因此在司法實務(wù)中我們的法官總結(jié)各種案例,參考各部門法提出了非公益必要不干擾原則來解決現(xiàn)今社會復(fù)雜的互聯(lián)網(wǎng)不正當(dāng)競爭訴訟。非公益必要不干擾原則不僅在反不正當(dāng)競爭法滯后的情況下有其適用的空間,就是在2016年2月頒布的反不正當(dāng)競爭法修改建議稿實施的情況下也有其適用的空間,因為任何一個具體的法律條文都不可能詳細(xì)列舉現(xiàn)實生活中的復(fù)雜狀況,我們生活的社會永遠(yuǎn)都是新的,是不會按照我們彩排的方式進(jìn)行,因此會出現(xiàn)很多我們無法想象的爭端,而這樣的爭端單單靠出臺的法律來進(jìn)行解決是不現(xiàn)實的,就需要一個相對概括的法律原則來對未來生活中將會出現(xiàn)的爭端進(jìn)行規(guī)制,而非公益必要不干擾原則便是迎合來這一需求而生。在未來的社會生活中我們所要做的不是摒棄這一抽象的法律原則,而是盡可能的詳盡這一原則的適用條件,使得其能夠應(yīng)用于各種復(fù)雜的案件之中。非公益必要不干擾原則的內(nèi)在核心便是維護(hù)市場競爭秩序,反對市場中的不正當(dāng)競爭行為和不恰當(dāng)干擾行為,尊重用戶的自身選擇,禁止網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)提供者通過行為誘導(dǎo)而凌駕于用戶之上,成為用戶選擇的真正實施者。當(dāng)今社會利益多元化的情況下,尋求其相互間的平衡始終是我們的目標(biāo)。非公益必要不干擾原則將經(jīng)營者的利益、消費者的利益以及公共利益進(jìn)行同樣高度的重視與保護(hù)是非常值得肯定和支持的,其不僅對各方利益進(jìn)行保護(hù)與平衡,同樣對維護(hù)競爭秩序與鼓勵互聯(lián)網(wǎng)技術(shù)創(chuàng)新具有重要作用。
[Abstract]:The computer with an irresistible force like an avalanche of impact, every industry society, deep into every corner. With the rapid development of computer technology and vigorously promote the Internet era, the industrial society is a big step in the Internet era. The advent of the Internet era, human society has brought a lot of convenience, it also brings new the challenges in the field of anti unfair competition to the people. With the continuous progress of the development of social economy and science and technology, has produced many new forms of behavior of network competition in the Internet field. Based on these competitive behavior of the Internet because of its forward-looking technology, adopt the way of regulation of the issue is always needed in our judicial practice. To solve the problem of our current national "Anti Unfair Competition Law" implemented in twentieth Century ninety years early, its release. Is to create a fair competition environment for the market, unfair competition acts against the presence and control in the market, so as to maintain market stability, the protection of the rights and interests of consumers. The Internet is now on the Internet and mobile Internet as the main carrier, in the face of unfair competition behavior of various enterprises complicated, limited the law also is obvious. The practice has proved unable to use the traditional way of thinking and technical means to fully deal with these disputes, the development requirements of the times and put forward the principle of no interference of non public necessity will conform to the high court of Beijing, so the stone win judges in the trial unfair 360 v. Baidu the competition dispute case, in order to solve these new disputes. The inherent law has lagged behind, the promulgation of even as far as possible to consider the economic development of the society in the future And it is impossible to put all of the society in the future to consider detailed and thoughtful, not the last century law promulgated in 90s is expected to today the rapid development of the Internet, but also provides an effective solution for today's Internet environment will not dispute, therefore in the judicial practice in our case the judge summed up the various departments, the reference method is put forward. Non public unnecessary interference principle to solve the current social complex Internet unfair competition litigation. The principle of interference of non public need not only has its applicable space in the anti unfair competition law is lagged behind, in February 2016 promulgated the anti unfair competition law suggestion on the case of the implementation also has its application space because, any specific legal provisions can not be listed in detail the complicated situation in real life, we live in a society is always new, is not We will follow the rehearsal, so we can not imagine there will be a lot of dispute, such dispute only by law to solve is not realistic, we need a relatively general principles of law to regulate the future life will be a dispute, rather than principle does not interfere with public need this is to cater to the needs of students. We have to do in the future social life is not to abandon the abstract legal principles, but as far as possible the detailed conditions of this principle, so that it can be applied to all kinds of complicated cases. The inner core principles necessary is the interference of non public maintenance the order of market competition, against unfair competition behavior in the market and inappropriate interference behavior, respect the user's own choice, no network service providers through the behavior induced above the top of the user And become the user to select the real implementation of the diversification of social interests. In today's situation, seek the mutual balance is always our goal. Non public unnecessary interference principle to the interests of the operators, to the interests of consumers and the public interest also attaches great importance to and protection of height is very worthy of recognition and support, not only for the protect and balance the interests of all parties, also plays an important role in maintaining the competitive order and encourage Internet technology innovation.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：華中師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D922.294

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 ;互聯(lián)網(wǎng)與傳統(tǒng)產(chǎn)業(yè)的碰撞[J];創(chuàng)造;2006年Z1期

2 馬麗;;賴霖楓:互聯(lián)網(wǎng)開啟另一黃金時代[J];法人;2010年03期

3 肖杰;;解密互聯(lián)網(wǎng)公司贏利模式[J];職工法律天地;2008年05期

4 黃蕙;中國互聯(lián)網(wǎng)業(yè)在轉(zhuǎn)型中復(fù)蘇[J];w攣胖蕓，

本文編號：1755603