本文選題：反補貼條例　切入點：立法修訂　出處：《江漢學(xué)術(shù)》2016年02期

【摘要】：《反補貼條例》是我國在剛?cè)胧罆r為符合WTO的要求而匆忙制定的,條例與WTO法的表面一致并不能掩蓋實踐中逐漸暴露的具體問題。隨著我國參與WTO體制的實踐的推進和對WTO法理解的深化,在距離上一次《反補貼條例》修訂的十年之后再進行修改與補充正當(dāng)其時。我國《反補貼條例》的修訂應(yīng)當(dāng)貫徹公平貿(mào)易的基本原則;把握我國在實施反補貼措施時集中暴露的程序與實體問題;學(xué)習(xí)歐美反補貼立法中的先進制度;從多哈回合談判的中國立場考慮國內(nèi)反補貼立法的可能走向;維護WTO體制,以更為開放的姿態(tài)反對貿(mào)易保護主義。
[Abstract]:Anti-subsidy regulations were hastily formulated by China in order to meet the requirements of WTO at the beginning of China's entry into the WTO. The apparent consistency between the regulations and the WTO Law can not cover up the specific problems gradually exposed in practice.With the promotion of the practice of China's participation in the WTO system and the deepening of the understanding of the WTO law, it is time to revise and supplement it ten years after the last revision of the "countervailing regulations".The revision of China's countervailing regulations should carry out the basic principles of fair trade, grasp the procedural and substantive problems in China's implementation of countervailing measures, and learn from the advanced system of countervailing legislation in Europe and the United States.Considering the possible direction of domestic countervailing legislation from the standpoint of China in the Doha Round, maintaining the WTO system and opposing trade protectionism in a more open manner.
【作者單位】： 天津財經(jīng)大學(xué)法學(xué)院;
【基金】：國家社會科學(xué)基金青年項目“世貿(mào)組織裁決的國內(nèi)執(zhí)行問題研究”(14CFX081)
【分類號】：D996.1;D922.295

【相似文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 林道海;;WTO法十年與中國“入世”五年的協(xié)調(diào)發(fā)展[J];南京財經(jīng)大學(xué)學(xué)報;2007年01期

，

本文編號：1708707