本文選題：無效決議　切入點：決議不存在　出處：《沈陽師范大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：股東會決議是公司效力最高的決議,當(dāng)股東會決議存在瑕疵時,不但會影響公司本身的利益,更能影響到公司股東和公司利害關(guān)系人的利益,甚至有可能會影響到公司的決策以及公司未來的發(fā)展。為維護(hù)公司、股東和公司債權(quán)人的利益,我國《公司法》規(guī)定了瑕疵股東會決議的訴訟救濟(jì)程序。近幾年來,隨著國家和公司的發(fā)展,司法實踐中出現(xiàn)大量的不屬于訴訟救濟(jì)程序的情形,其原因是《公司法》并沒有認(rèn)識到?jīng)Q議無效之訴和決議可撤銷之訴的法律行為本質(zhì)。本文以分析李某訴慈尚食品加工有限責(zé)任公司股東會決議效力糾紛案為前提,結(jié)合我國瑕疵股東會決議訴訟救濟(jì)程序的學(xué)術(shù)理論和我國《公司法解釋四(征求意見稿)》的法律規(guī)定,針對我國瑕疵股東會決議訴訟救濟(jì)程序的類型化厘定、訴訟主體的界定和訴訟起訴期間限制所存在的問題以及給出合理的建議。本文希望通過對以上問題的分析能夠使公司面臨瑕疵股東會決議時能夠清晰的分辨出訴訟救濟(jì)程序類型、其是否具有提起訴訟的主體資格及其被訴主體和其是否超過起訴期間的限制,最主要的是規(guī)范有限責(zé)任公司股東會的程序,避免產(chǎn)生瑕疵情形和減少訴訟成本。首先,本文將對李某訴慈尚食品加工公司股東會效力糾紛案進(jìn)行相應(yīng)的敘述,從中歸納出本案有關(guān)瑕疵股東會決議效力的爭議焦點。其次,對于訴訟類型的厘定,先對三種訴訟類型之間的分類標(biāo)準(zhǔn)進(jìn)行界定,然后通過對每一種類型所具備的情形進(jìn)行詳述,使當(dāng)事人能夠準(zhǔn)確的分辨瑕疵股東會決議類型。同時作者通過論述我國訴訟類型理論和立法之間的區(qū)別,對我國征求意見稿提出完善意見。第三,作者將對于訴訟主體的界定和起訴期間的限制進(jìn)行相應(yīng)論述,使得當(dāng)事人能夠清楚知道其是否具有起訴主體資格和是否超過起訴期間,由于股東會決議無效之訴、不存在之訴的起訴主體和訴訟時效限制具有特殊性,作者將對此進(jìn)行著重論述。最后作者希望能夠通過本文合理分析理論和司法實踐之間的差異,希望能為此次的征求意見稿貢獻(xiàn)自己的微薄之力。
[Abstract]:The resolution of shareholders' meeting is the most effective resolution of the company. When the resolution of shareholders' meeting is flawed, it will not only affect the interests of the company itself, but also the interests of shareholders and stakeholders of the company. In order to protect the interests of the company, shareholders and creditors of the company, the Company Law of our country has stipulated the procedure of litigation relief for the resolution of the defective shareholders' meeting. In recent years, With the development of the country and the company, there are a large number of cases that do not belong to the litigation procedure in the judicial practice. The reason is that the Company Law does not recognize the nature of the legal action of the invalidation of the resolution and the revocable action of the resolution. This article is based on the analysis of the dispute over the validity of the resolution of the shareholders' meeting of Limou v. Cishang Food processing Co., Ltd. Combined with the academic theory of litigation relief procedure of defective shareholders' meeting and the legal provisions of our country's Company Law interpretation IV (draft for soliciting opinions), the classification of litigation relief procedure of defective shareholders' meeting resolution is determined. The definition of litigant and the problems existing in the limitation of litigation period and the reasonable suggestions are given. This paper hopes that the analysis of the above problems can enable the company to distinguish the lawsuit clearly when it faces the resolution of the defective shareholders' meeting. Type of relief proceedings, The most important thing is to standardize the procedure of shareholders' meeting of limited liability company, to avoid defects and to reduce litigation costs. This article will make a corresponding narration to the dispute case of the validity of the shareholders' meeting of Li Mou v. Cishang Food processing Company, from which we can conclude the focus of the dispute about the validity of the resolution of the defective shareholders' meeting. Secondly, the determination of the type of litigation. The classification criteria between the three types of litigation are defined first, and then the circumstances of each type are described in detail. At the same time, by discussing the difference between the theory of litigation type and legislation, the author puts forward the perfect opinions on the draft of soliciting opinions of our country. The author will discuss the definition of litigant and the limitation of prosecution period, so that the litigant can know clearly whether he has the qualification of suing subject and whether it exceeds the period of suing, because of the invalid action of the shareholders' meeting, The author will focus on the special nature of the subject of prosecution and limitation of limitation of action in non-existent litigation. Finally, the author hopes that the difference between theory and judicial practice can be reasonably analyzed through this article. Hope to be able to this request for comments to contribute their own modest contribution.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：沈陽師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D922.291.91

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 王雷;;公司決議行為瑕疵制度的解釋與完善——兼評公司法司法解釋四(征求意見稿)第4～9條規(guī)定[J];清華法學(xué);2016年05期

2 甘培忠;趙文冰;;對公司決議效力的一些思考——析《最高人民法院關(guān)于適用〈中華人民共和國公司法〉若干問題的規(guī)定(四)》(征求意見稿)中的相關(guān)規(guī)定[J];法律適用;2016年08期

3 趙心澤;;股東會決議效力的判斷標(biāo)準(zhǔn)與判斷原則[J];政法論壇;2016年01期

4 徐銀波;;決議行為效力規(guī)則之構(gòu)造[J];法學(xué)研究;2015年04期

5 丁勇;;公司決議瑕疵訴訟制度若干問題反思及立法完善~[J];證券法苑;2014年02期

6 陳建勛;;未通知全體股東的股東會之決議效力[J];人民司法;2014年08期

7 許中緣;;論意思表示瑕疵的共同法律行為——以社團(tuán)決議撤銷為研究視角[J];中國法學(xué);2013年06期

8 張旭榮;;法律行為視角下公司會議決議效力形態(tài)分析[J];比較法研究;2013年06期

9 丁勇;;股東大會決議撤銷之訴功能反思[J];法學(xué);2013年07期

10 理喻;;涉公司股東權(quán)益司法實務(wù)問題答疑——專訪最高人民法院民二庭負(fù)責(zé)人[J];法律適用;2013年07期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前6條

1 佟囡囝;股東會決議不成立法律制度研究[D];吉林大學(xué);2016年

2 王冷玫;股東大會決議不存在制度研究[D];南京大學(xué);2013年

3 劉艷艷;股東大會決議撤銷制度研究[D];吉林大學(xué);2008年

4 樂嵐;股東大會決議瑕疵救濟(jì)制度研究[D];華中師范大學(xué);2007年

5 張娟;股東大會決議可撤銷制度研究[D];中國政法大學(xué);2007年

6 于麗娜;股東大會決議瑕疵法律問題研究[D];中國政法大學(xué);2006年

，

本文編號：1680570