本文選題：二線競爭損害　切入點：經(jīng)濟效率　出處：《價格理論與實踐》2017年06期

【摘要】：反壟斷法對價格歧視行為規(guī)制的核心要件是競爭損害,競爭損害根據(jù)受害競爭者所在市場的不同劃分為一線競爭損害和二線競爭損害。對于二線競爭損害的認定,美國反壟斷司法實踐已基本廢棄競爭者保護方法,采用市場損害認定,使競爭損害評價的法學與經(jīng)濟學理論趨于一致,而歐盟反壟斷司法實踐仍適用形式方法的本身違法規(guī)則,以競爭者損害代替競爭損害,不僅在理論上致使法學與經(jīng)濟學的割裂,在實踐中也多有缺陷。我國執(zhí)法與司法實踐應借鑒美國反壟斷法競爭損害認定的經(jīng)濟效率基礎,克服歐盟法律形式主義的弊端。
[Abstract]:The core element of the regulation of price discrimination in anti-monopoly law is competition damage, which is divided into first-line competition damage and second-line competition damage according to the market where the injured competitors are located. The judicial practice of antitrust in the United States has basically abandoned the method of protection of competitors and adopted market damage determination, which makes the theory of law and economics of evaluation of competition damage converge, while the anti-monopoly judicial practice of the European Union still applies the illegal rules of the formal method. Replacing the competition damage with the competitor damage not only leads to the separation of law and economics in theory, but also has many defects in practice. Our law enforcement and judicial practice should draw lessons from the economic efficiency basis of the recognition of competition damage in American anti-monopoly law. To overcome the drawbacks of EU legal formalism.
【作者單位】： 宜春學院政法學院;
【分類號】：D971.2;DD912.29
，

本文編號：1658532