本文選題：價格歧視　切入點：行為認定　出處：《中國政法大學(xué)》2006年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：價格歧視是經(jīng)營者經(jīng)常使用的定價策略。各國反壟斷法對價格歧視行為分別做出不同程度的規(guī)制,我國對價格歧視的立法尚缺乏系統(tǒng)性的規(guī)定。究竟什么樣的價格歧視行為才應(yīng)受到反壟斷法的規(guī)制,以及應(yīng)該進行怎樣的規(guī)制,是有關(guān)價格歧視行為的兩個重要問題。本文通過分析國外立法并結(jié)合我國現(xiàn)狀,運用比較分析和目的解釋的方法,分別對以上兩個問題進行分析和研究。 本文在經(jīng)濟學(xué)界和法學(xué)界對價格歧視界定的基礎(chǔ)上,從法學(xué)的角度對價格歧視行為的認定和相應(yīng)的法律責(zé)任進行分析,本文除前言和結(jié)論外,共分五個部分。前言部分主要介紹價格歧視在理論界的爭議和產(chǎn)生爭議的原因,以及我國有關(guān)立法現(xiàn)狀和存在問題,以說明筆者選寫本文的動機。 第一部分主要論述價格歧視的概念及雙重影響。本部分在考察經(jīng)濟學(xué)界和法學(xué)界對價格歧視界定的基礎(chǔ)上,提煉出與該界定相關(guān)的重點因素。對價格歧視雙重影響分析的意義在于分析和判斷應(yīng)否應(yīng)對所有的價格歧視進行反壟斷法規(guī)制。 第二部分主要論述我國關(guān)于價格歧視的立法現(xiàn)狀,提出存在的問題主要集中于價格歧視行為認定的問題、主管部門中存在的問題和價格歧視行為應(yīng)負的法律責(zé)任問題。 第三部分在價格歧視認定方面,主要分為五個問題進行論述。其一價格歧視主體的身份地位應(yīng)不限于市場支配地位,具有市場優(yōu)勢地位即可,市場優(yōu)勢地位包括市場支配地位和交易中的優(yōu)勢地位。其二價格歧視的行為對象應(yīng)包括消費者,因為對消費者實施的價格歧視行為有可能會危害到整體消費者的利益。其三在行為要件方面,價格歧視行為不再單純表現(xiàn)為可用貨幣衡量的差別價格,不同形式利益的提供同樣可能構(gòu)成價格歧視行為。其四在后果要件方面,價格歧視的后果要件是會危害到或可能危害到市場競爭秩序和整體消費者的利益。其五價格歧視的抗辯理由,無論是行為層次的抗辯理由還是后果層次的抗辯理由,都可以歸結(jié)為沒有產(chǎn)生負面效應(yīng)或者正面效應(yīng)超過負面效應(yīng)的情形。 第四部分在主管部門方面,從立法現(xiàn)狀出發(fā),找出主管部門存在的問題,并針對存在的問題進行相應(yīng)的完善。 第五部分在法律責(zé)任方面,價格歧視行為實施者所應(yīng)承擔(dān)的法律責(zé)任根源于
[Abstract]:Price discrimination is a kind of pricing strategy often used by operators. Anti-monopoly laws of various countries regulate price discrimination to varying degrees. The legislation of price discrimination in our country lacks systematic regulation. What kind of price discrimination should be regulated by anti-monopoly law, and what kind of regulation should be carried out? This paper analyzes and studies the above two problems by analyzing the foreign legislation and combining the present situation of our country with the methods of comparative analysis and purpose explanation. On the basis of the definition of price discrimination in the field of economics and law, this paper analyzes the cognizance of price discrimination and the corresponding legal liability from the angle of law. In addition to the foreword and conclusion, It is divided into five parts. The preface mainly introduces the disputes and causes of price discrimination in the theoretical circle, as well as the current situation and existing problems of legislation in China, in order to explain the motivation of the author to choose and write this article. The first part mainly discusses the concept of price discrimination and its dual influence. The significance of the double impact analysis of price discrimination lies in analyzing and judging whether all price discrimination should be regulated by antimonopoly law. The second part mainly discusses the current situation of legislation on price discrimination in our country, and points out that the existing problems mainly focus on the identification of price discrimination, the problems existing in the competent departments and the legal liability of price discrimination. The third part mainly divides into five questions in the price discrimination confirmation aspect. First, the price discrimination main body's identity status should not be limited to the market dominant position, has the market superiority status can, The dominant position of the market includes the dominant position in the market and the dominant position in the transaction. The behavior object of the second price discrimination should include the consumer, Because price discrimination against consumers is likely to endanger the interests of consumers as a whole. Third, in terms of behavior elements, price discrimination is no longer simply a form of differential price that can be measured in currency. The provision of different forms of benefits may also constitute an act of price discrimination. Fourth, in terms of the elements of consequences, The consequence of price discrimination is that it will endanger or may endanger the order of market competition and the interests of the consumers as a whole. All can be attributed to the absence of a negative effect or the fact that the positive effect exceeds the negative effect. In 4th, from the current situation of legislation, the author tries to find out the problems existing in the competent departments and perfect them accordingly. 5th in terms of legal liability, the legal liability of the perpetrators of price discrimination stems from
【學(xué)位授予單位】：中國政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2006
【分類號】：D922.294

【引證文獻】

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 羅婷婷;論我國價格歧視的法律規(guī)制[D];貴州大學(xué);2009年

，

本文編號：1615677