本文選題：公司資本制度　切入點(diǎn)：債權(quán)人保護(hù)　出處：《青島大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文　論文類(lèi)型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：為順應(yīng)市場(chǎng)發(fā)展的變化,契合“大眾創(chuàng)業(yè),萬(wàn)眾創(chuàng)新”的時(shí)代精神,我國(guó)在2013年頒布了新修訂的《公司法》,圍繞公司資本制度展開(kāi)了一系列改革,改革的主要內(nèi)容包括:實(shí)行認(rèn)繳資本制,取消最低注冊(cè)資本,取消貨幣出資比例以及出資期限的限制�？偟膩�(lái)說(shuō),這一變革使得過(guò)去由國(guó)家嚴(yán)格管制公司資本的狀況發(fā)生了根本改變,把公司資本的相關(guān)事項(xiàng)交由股東和公司自治,降低了公司設(shè)立的門(mén)檻,對(duì)于鼓勵(lì)創(chuàng)新創(chuàng)業(yè)活動(dòng),增強(qiáng)市場(chǎng)活力起到了巨大的促進(jìn)作用。但本次改革在帶來(lái)市場(chǎng)繁榮的同時(shí)也帶來(lái)了債權(quán)人保護(hù)方面的新問(wèn)題。注冊(cè)資本的債權(quán)利擔(dān)保功能被明顯弱化,之前借助公司注冊(cè)資本來(lái)保障債權(quán)人利益的機(jī)制難以繼續(xù)發(fā)揮作用。如何在新的公司資本制度下更好的保護(hù)債權(quán)人利益,成為了一個(gè)亟待解決的問(wèn)題,也就是本文的研究目的。筆者認(rèn)為本次公司資本制度改革對(duì)于債權(quán)人利益保護(hù)造成的不利影響主要包括:增加債權(quán)人判斷交易公司資產(chǎn)的困難、增加了債權(quán)人受償?shù)娘L(fēng)險(xiǎn)、公司外觀信用標(biāo)示被嚴(yán)重削弱、公司年度資產(chǎn)負(fù)債情況難以把握四個(gè)方面。資本制度的變化之所以會(huì)對(duì)債權(quán)人保護(hù)造成如此的不良影響主要是因?yàn)槲覈?guó)現(xiàn)行的債權(quán)人保護(hù)制度存在著缺陷,公司信息披露制度,公司法人格否認(rèn)制度,董事、高管的責(zé)任制度三個(gè)方面都或多或少存在著問(wèn)題。針對(duì)以上問(wèn)題,筆者認(rèn)為可以通過(guò)確立合理的信息披露原則,對(duì)強(qiáng)制性信息披露的內(nèi)容做出明確規(guī)定,拓寬信息披露渠道,強(qiáng)化不實(shí)信息披露的民事責(zé)任等方面來(lái)完善信息披露制度,通過(guò)增加人格否認(rèn)制度的使用條件,明確人格否認(rèn)制度的主體范圍,健全人格否認(rèn)制度適用的行為要件等方面來(lái)完善公司的人格否認(rèn)制度。通過(guò)明確董事高管應(yīng)當(dāng)承擔(dān)責(zé)任的具體情形,完善董事高管的民事責(zé)任制度等方式來(lái)完善董事高管的責(zé)任制度。
[Abstract]:In order to adapt to the change of market development and accord with the spirit of "mass entrepreneurship and innovation", in 2013, our country promulgated the newly revised Company Law, which carried out a series of reforms around the company capital system. The main contents of the reform include the implementation of the subscription capital system, the abolition of the minimum registered capital, the abolition of the ratio of monetary contributions and the limitation of the duration of the contribution. This change has led to a fundamental change in the situation in the past when the state strictly controlled corporate capital, handing over matters related to corporate capital to shareholders and corporate autonomy, lowering the threshold for the establishment of companies, and encouraging innovative entrepreneurial activities. Enhancing market vitality has played a huge role in promoting the market. But this reform has not only brought about market prosperity but also brought about new problems in the protection of creditors. The creditor's interest guarantee function of registered capital has been significantly weakened. It was difficult for the mechanism to protect the interests of creditors with the help of company registered capital before. How to better protect the interests of creditors under the new company capital system has become a problem to be solved urgently. The author believes that the adverse effects of the company capital system reform on the protection of creditors' interests mainly include: increasing the difficulty for creditors to judge the assets of the trading company and increasing the risk of creditors being compensated. The company's external credit mark has been severely weakened, It is difficult to grasp the annual assets and liabilities of a company in four aspects. The reason why the change of capital system has such a bad effect on the protection of creditors is mainly because the current creditor protection system of our country has defects, the company information disclosure system, There are more or less problems in the system of denial of corporate personality, the responsibility of directors and executives. In view of the above problems, the author thinks that we can establish the principle of reasonable disclosure of information. The content of mandatory information disclosure is clearly stipulated, the channel of information disclosure is widened, the civil liability of false information disclosure is strengthened, and the system of information disclosure is perfected by increasing the conditions of using the system of personality denial. Make clear the subject scope of the personality denial system, perfect the behavior elements of the personality denial system to perfect the personality denial system of the company. Perfecting the civil liability system of directors and executives to perfect the responsibility system of directors and executives.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：青島大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D922.291.91

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 程雋怡;;試論董事責(zé)任限制制度在中國(guó)公司法上的建構(gòu)[J];黑龍江省政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2015年04期

2 薛波;;論公司資本制度改革后債權(quán)人保護(hù)機(jī)制之完善[J];時(shí)代法學(xué);2015年02期

3 魏旭玲;;對(duì)我國(guó)公司資本制度改革下債權(quán)人利益保護(hù)的思考[J];法制與社會(huì);2015年09期

4 黃耀文;;認(rèn)繳資本制度下的債權(quán)人利益保護(hù)[J];政法論壇;2015年01期

5 賴(lài)麗華;;新公司法資本制度架構(gòu)下交易安全保障機(jī)制研究[J];企業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì);2014年09期

6 胡田野;;公司資本制度變革后的債權(quán)人保護(hù)路徑[J];法律適用;2014年07期

7 呂來(lái)明;楊明敏;;論我國(guó)公司資本制度的改革及債權(quán)人利益的保護(hù)[J];法律適用;2013年12期

8 黃輝;;中國(guó)公司法人格否認(rèn)制度實(shí)證研究[J];法學(xué)研究;2012年01期

9 張慧蓉;;我國(guó)上市公司信息披露制度反思[J];人民論壇;2010年32期

10 任自力;曹文澤;;論公司董事責(zé)任的限制[J];法學(xué)家;2007年05期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 張禹;國(guó)有公司監(jiān)事違反注意義務(wù)的民事責(zé)任研究[D];浙江師范大學(xué);2016年

2 樊靜;公司債權(quán)人利益保護(hù)研究[D];山西財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué);2015年

，

本文編號(hào)：1606991