發(fā)布時間：2018-03-12 08:51

  本文選題：經(jīng)營者集中　切入點：經(jīng)營者集中附加限制性條件批準　出處：《河南大學》2015年碩士論文　論文類型：學位論文

【摘要】：一直以來,經(jīng)營者為了做大做強,往往通過經(jīng)營者集中形成規(guī)模經(jīng)濟,這是其追求規(guī)模效益的重要手段,對推動經(jīng)濟發(fā)展、社會進步的作用不可小覷,但是,經(jīng)營者集中本身是一把雙刃劍,在帶來經(jīng)濟效益的同時存在或者可能存在具有排除、限制競爭等反競爭效果的風險,因此,如何避免經(jīng)營者集中帶來的反競爭效果是世界各國關注的重點。經(jīng)營者集中控制制度、規(guī)制壟斷協(xié)議法律制度、規(guī)制濫用市場支配地位的法律制度是我國反壟斷法律制度的三大支柱。其中,經(jīng)營者集中控制制度在我國反壟斷法律制度中具有重要地位。經(jīng)營者集中控制是國家干預市場的一種手段,由于經(jīng)營者集中是一把雙刃劍,既要維持經(jīng)營者集中帶動經(jīng)濟效益、規(guī)模效益的發(fā)展,又要規(guī)避經(jīng)營者集中存在或者可能存在的阻礙競爭、破壞競爭秩序等反競爭效果的出現(xiàn),因此,對經(jīng)營者集中不能因噎廢食的一律禁止,而應就其具體的積極效果和反競爭效果進行認定權衡,對不具有嚴重的排除、限制競爭等反競爭效果的經(jīng)營者集中國務院反壟斷執(zhí)法機構一般不予以競爭關注或予以批準的決定,對具有嚴重的排除、限制競爭等反競爭效果的經(jīng)營者集中一般予以直接禁止的決定,而對于不會導致嚴重排除、限制競爭等反競爭效果的經(jīng)營者集中經(jīng)營者允許附條件批準,即允許通過附加限制性條件對經(jīng)營者集中具有或者可能具有的排除、限制競爭的效果進行補救。以維持經(jīng)營者集中前的正常的市場競爭秩序和市場競爭活力。我國《反壟斷法》自2008年實施以來,《國務院關于經(jīng)營者集中申報標準的規(guī)定》、《經(jīng)營者集中申報辦法》、《經(jīng)營者集中審查辦法》、《關于經(jīng)營者集中附加限制性條件的規(guī)定(試行)》等配套規(guī)則不斷完善,我國反壟斷執(zhí)法機關的執(zhí)法經(jīng)驗不斷豐富,執(zhí)法能力得到提高,但我國經(jīng)營者集中附加限制性條件批準制度尚未形成完整體系。本文通過對我國現(xiàn)行經(jīng)營者集中附加限制性條件批準法律制度的研究,結合實際案例,試圖對現(xiàn)行制度的健全和完善提出建議。遵循該研究思路,文章共有四個部分:第一部分,經(jīng)營者集中附加限制性條件批準法律制度的基本理論。這一部分主要對經(jīng)營者集中附加限制性條件批準的基本含義、理論基礎及其適用前提進行梳理,對該制度的形成與發(fā)展及其在整個反壟斷法律制度中的重要地位有更清晰的認識。第二部分,我國現(xiàn)行經(jīng)營者集中附加限制性條件批準法律制度的主要內(nèi)容。該部分對我國現(xiàn)行經(jīng)營者集中附加限制性條件批準法律制度及執(zhí)法過程中的實踐案例進行分析,認為限制性條件的提出、確定、實施、監(jiān)督及法律責任的設置是經(jīng)營者集中附加限制性條件批準的重要環(huán)節(jié),對消除反競爭效果的實現(xiàn)具有重要意義。第三部分,我國經(jīng)營者集中附加限制性條件批準法律制度存在的問題。通過上述兩部分對我國經(jīng)營者集中附加限制性條件批準法律制度的基本理論和現(xiàn)行制度的研究,指出我國現(xiàn)行制度中存在的問題,如相關法律規(guī)定較原則,操作性不強,以及在實際案件審查中審查過程不透明、信息披露不足、后續(xù)監(jiān)督力量薄弱、監(jiān)督機制不完善等,并對上述問題進行分析。第四部分,我國經(jīng)營者集中附加限制性條件批準法律制度的完善建議。該部分針對第三部分中提出的問題,試圖對我國經(jīng)營者集中附加限制性條件批準制度的健全和體系的完善提出建議。我國反壟斷法起步較晚,通過對外國先進立法技術和豐富執(zhí)法經(jīng)驗的借鑒,結合我國執(zhí)法實踐,在對既往案例進行研究,建立理由說明制度、信息報告制度、公共利益測試制度等方面提出建議。
[Abstract]:Since the operators in order to become bigger and stronger, tend to form scale economy through business concentration, which is an important means to the pursuit of scale, to promote economic development and social progress should not be overlooked, but the concentration itself is a double-edged sword, there may exist or excluded from bringing economic benefits at the same time, the risk of the effect of restricting competition, therefore, how to avoid the anti competitive effects of the concentration of business operators bring is the focus of the world. The control system of concentration of business operators, regulate the monopoly agreement in legal system, the legal system of regulation of abuse of market dominant position is one of the three pillars of China's anti-monopoly law system. The operator centralized control system in China's anti-monopoly law system has an important position. The operator centralized control is a means of state intervention in the market, because the operator is concentrated A double-edged sword, both to maintain focus on promoting economic benefit the development of operators, economies of scale, but also to avoid the concentration of business operators exist or may exist hinder competition, destroy the competition order such anti competitive effects of the concentration of business operators shall be banned and not unworthy, should the positive effect of concrete and anti competitive effects that balance, serious exclusion does not have, operators restricting competition effect of the anti monopoly law enforcement agency under the State Council focused attention is generally not be competition or approve the decision to exclude serious, operators restricting competition effect can be directly concentrated against the decision, but to not lead to serious exclude operators restricting competition effect of the concentration of business operators to allow conditional approval, which allows additional restrictive conditions of business by Their concentration has or may have excluded the effect of restricting competition remedy. In order to maintain the concentration of business operators before the normal order of market competition and market competition vigor. China's "anti-monopoly law" since 2008 since the implementation of the provisions of the State Council "on notification thresholds > > < centralized declaration operator, review procedures < < > centralized operator, provisions on additional restrictive conditions of concentration of business operators (Trial) > matching rules continue to improve, China's anti-monopoly law enforcement agencies of law enforcement experience enriched, law enforcement ability can be improved, but China's operators focus on additional restrictive conditions approved by the system has not yet formed a complete system. Based on the research of China the concentration of business operators to approve the additional restrictive conditions of the legal system, combined with the actual case, to give some suggestions and improvements to the existing system. According to the research ideas, The paper consists of four parts: the first part, the basic theory of the concentration of business operators to approve the additional restrictive conditions of the legal system. The main part of the basic meaning of the concentration of business operators to approve the additional restrictive conditions, theoretical basis and premise to sort out, have a clear understanding on the formation and development of the system in the anti monopoly the legal system in an important position. In the second part, the main content of China's current operators focus on additional restrictive conditions approved by the legal system. This part carries on the analysis to the practical case of additional restrictive conditions to the concentration of China's current legal system and law enforcement executive approval process, that the restrictive conditions of determining, implementation, supervision and the legal responsibility of the concentration of business operators is an important link to approve the additional restrictive conditions, is of great significance to eliminate the anti competitive effects of the third. In part, the presence of additional restrictive conditions approved the anti-monopoly law. Through the study of the two part of our operators to focus on additional restrictive conditions approved by the basic theory of legal system and the existing system, points out the existing problems in our current system, such as the relevant provisions of the law is the principle, operability is not strong, the review process and opaque cases in the actual review, insufficient information disclosure, follow-up supervision and weak supervision mechanism is not perfect, and to analyze these issues. The fourth part, China's operators focus on additional restrictive conditions approved proposals on perfecting the legal system. This part puts forward the problems in the third part, I try to the concentration of additional restrictions perfect conditions of approval system and system are proposed. The late start of China's anti-monopoly law, based on the foreign advanced legislation. Based on the experience of law enforcement and rich law enforcement experience, combined with the practice of law enforcement in China, we put forward suggestions on past cases, establishing reason explanation system, information reporting system, and public interest testing system.

【學位授予單位】：河南大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2015
【分類號】：D922.294

【相似文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 劉武朝;;論經(jīng)營者集中附限制性條件執(zhí)行爭議的仲裁適用[J];河北法學;2013年10期

2 ;我國將出臺三部反壟斷法配套規(guī)則[J];造紙信息;2011年11期

3 劉春霞;白云;;確立我國登記離婚限制性條件之探討[J];經(jīng)濟研究導刊;2009年05期

4 劉武朝;;論經(jīng)營者集中反壟斷審查中的“皇冠寶石”制度——兼評《關于經(jīng)營者集中附加限制性條件的規(guī)定(征求意見稿)》第19條[J];理論月刊;2014年03期

5 楊茂喜;劉武朝;;我國附條件批準經(jīng)營者集中的發(fā)展與完善[J];中國高新技術企業(yè);2011年27期

6 ;反壟斷法新配套法規(guī)即將出臺[J];乙醛醋酸化工;2014年06期

7 邱春霖;;論反壟斷法中附條件批準經(jīng)營者集中制度[J];法治研究;2009年10期

8 陳穎;;我國非政府組織發(fā)展的限制性條件及其路徑探析[J];內(nèi)蒙古農(nóng)業(yè)大學學報(社會科學版);2012年05期

9 金鳳濤,曹世華;立體商標注冊的限制性條件[J];法學雜志;2005年06期

10 叢穎超 ,林曉東;正確認識稅收作用的限制性條件[J];理論學刊;1996年05期

相關重要報紙文章 前8條

1 維峰;經(jīng)營者集中附加限制性條件規(guī)定征求意見[N];中國工商報;2013年

2 中國人民大學法學院 吳長軍;附加限制性條件承認經(jīng)營者集中案例評析[N];國際商報;2009年

3 王希;商務部解讀經(jīng)營者集中申報辦法和審查辦法[N];中國國門時報;2010年

4 王沛霖;商務部有附加限制性條件批準微軟收購諾基亞設備和服務業(yè)務[N];中國計算機報;2014年

5 本報記者 葉琦;安徽“公考” 取消所有加分[N];人民日報;2013年

6 張晨穎;經(jīng)營者集中的限制性條件之適用[N];國際商報;2010年

7 黃標;零售促銷新規(guī)能否沖破“打折迷霧”[N];檢察日報;2006年

8 姚宗;經(jīng)營者集中反壟斷審查依法有序進行[N];國際商報;2008年

相關碩士學位論文 前9條

1 安壽輝;經(jīng)營者集中的附限制性條件研究[D];云南財經(jīng)大學;2011年

2 高銘晗;論我國經(jīng)營者集中附條件批準中的行為性條件[D];中國青年政治學院;2015年

3 張昱沁;經(jīng)營者集中附加限制性條件研究[D];南京財經(jīng)大學;2015年

4 羅旭;經(jīng)營者集中附條件批準效用分析[D];暨南大學;2015年

5 朱琳;我國經(jīng)營者集中附加限制性條件批準法律制度研究[D];河南大學;2015年

6 朱鳳林;經(jīng)營者集中審查中的附加限制性條件研究[D];南京師范大學;2011年

7 趙健;經(jīng)營者集中附加限制性條件研究[D];鄭州大學;2013年

8 疏平;中美經(jīng)營者集中附加限制性條件制度比較研究[D];安徽大學;2014年

9 付靜;美國、歐盟及我國經(jīng)營者集中救濟制度的比較研究[D];浙江大學;2014年

，

本文編號：1600855