本文選題：自然壟斷　切入點(diǎn)：消費(fèi)者　出處：《遼寧大學(xué)》2015年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：我國大多數(shù)行業(yè)在逐步深入的經(jīng)濟(jì)體制改革過程中已經(jīng)漸漸擺脫壟斷狀態(tài),取而代之的是一種自由競爭的狀態(tài),政府主要以市場化的方式實(shí)現(xiàn)行業(yè)管理的目的,對于市場主體競爭行為的規(guī)范主要依據(jù)競爭法。但是有些行業(yè)在特殊自然條件及供需關(guān)系的影響下,并不能順利的適應(yīng)市場競爭機(jī)制,這就是本文所講的自然壟斷行業(yè)�？梢哉f自然壟斷行業(yè)與我們的日常生活息息相關(guān),在公共產(chǎn)品和公共服務(wù)的提供方面承擔(dān)著不可替代的重要職能,對我國經(jīng)濟(jì)安全、穩(wěn)定的發(fā)展意義重大,但是就目前的情況來說,不管是此類行業(yè)本身抑或是對其法律規(guī)制方面都存在著一些問題。除此之外,作為消費(fèi)者的我們與這些提供公共產(chǎn)品與公共服務(wù)的生產(chǎn)者、經(jīng)營者相比,處于絕對的劣勢地位,不能完全自由地依據(jù)自己喜好對商品、服務(wù)及經(jīng)營者做出選擇�；谝陨峡紤]進(jìn)行了論文的寫作。本文主要分為四個(gè)部分:第一部分介紹自然壟斷的基礎(chǔ)理論及為何要對其進(jìn)行規(guī)制,在介紹自然壟斷的定義、特征、成因等理論的基礎(chǔ)之上,具體分析了為什么要對自然壟斷行業(yè)進(jìn)行進(jìn)行規(guī)制。第二部分從對我國自然壟斷行業(yè)進(jìn)行法律規(guī)制必要性入手,著重分析此類行業(yè)規(guī)制的現(xiàn)狀,主要包括相關(guān)法律規(guī)定存在的缺陷、法律責(zé)任弱化及競爭機(jī)構(gòu)與監(jiān)管機(jī)構(gòu)設(shè)置不具體三方面。第三部分介紹了美國及歐盟對自然壟斷行業(yè)的法律規(guī)制經(jīng)驗(yàn),試圖在厘清我國此類斷行業(yè)存在諸多問題的基礎(chǔ)上,通過比較分析的方法,借鑒西方發(fā)達(dá)國家自然壟斷行業(yè)法律規(guī)制的實(shí)踐明。第四部分綜合考慮我國自然壟斷行業(yè)法律規(guī)制存在的問題,借鑒國外相關(guān)的經(jīng)驗(yàn)與實(shí)踐,提出完善我國自然壟斷行業(yè)法律規(guī)制的建議。包括完善立法、合理配置規(guī)制機(jī)構(gòu)及其權(quán)力分配、完善價(jià)格規(guī)制措施及引入反壟斷公益訴訟制度。
[Abstract]:In the process of deepening economic system reform, most industries in our country have gradually got rid of the monopoly state and replaced by a state of free competition. The government mainly realizes the purpose of industry management by means of marketization. The regulation of competition behavior of market participants is mainly based on competition law. However, under the influence of special natural conditions and supply and demand relations, some industries are not able to adapt to the market competition mechanism smoothly. This is the natural monopoly industry mentioned in this paper. It can be said that the natural monopoly industry is closely related to our daily life and plays an irreplaceable important role in the provision of public goods and public services, which is of great importance to the economic security of our country. Steady development is of great significance, but there are some problems in the current situation, both in the industry itself and in its legal regulation. As consumers, we are at an absolute disadvantage compared to the producers and operators who provide public goods and services, and we are not completely free to base our preferences on goods. This paper is divided into four parts: the first part introduces the basic theory of natural monopoly and why it should be regulated, and introduces the definition and characteristics of natural monopoly. On the basis of the theory of cause of formation and so on, the author concretely analyzes why the natural monopoly industry should be regulated. The second part starts with the necessity of legal regulation of our country's natural monopoly industry, and emphatically analyzes the present situation of the regulation of this kind of industry. The third part introduces the legal regulation experience of the United States and the European Union in the natural monopoly industry, including the defects of the relevant laws and regulations, the weakening of legal liability and the non-specific establishment of competition agencies and regulatory bodies, the third part introduces the experience of the United States and the European Union in regulating natural monopoly industries. On the basis of clarifying the problems existing in such broken industries in China, this paper attempts to make a comparative analysis of these problems. Drawing lessons from the practice of the legal regulation of natural monopoly industry in western developed countries. 4th, considering the problems existing in the legal regulation of natural monopoly industry in our country, and drawing lessons from the relevant experience and practice of foreign countries. Some suggestions are put forward to perfect the legal regulation of the natural monopoly industry in China, including perfecting the legislation, rationally allocating the regulatory bodies and their power distribution, perfecting the price regulation measures and introducing the antitrust public interest litigation system.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：遼寧大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號】：D922.29

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前5條

1 張占江;徐士英;;自然壟斷行業(yè)反壟斷規(guī)制模式構(gòu)建[J];比較法研究;2010年03期

2 曹博;公用企業(yè)競爭與管制立法問題探析[J];法學(xué);2002年06期

3 鄭鵬程;論對我國自然壟斷行業(yè)的法律調(diào)整[J];中國軟科學(xué);2001年08期

4 唐欣瑜;;自然壟斷適用除外:從法經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)角度分析[J];知識經(jīng)濟(jì);2010年02期

5 高麒;;歐盟競爭法概述[J];知識經(jīng)濟(jì);2010年22期

，

本文編號：1559151