本文關(guān)鍵詞： 宏觀調(diào)控行為 可訴性 兩個(gè)層次 可訴途徑　出處：《湖南大學(xué)》2009年碩士論文　論文類(lèi)型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】： 宏觀調(diào)控越來(lái)越被重視,其在國(guó)家經(jīng)濟(jì)管理中也發(fā)揮著巨大的作用。但是同時(shí),在我國(guó)宏觀調(diào)控運(yùn)行中慢慢地暴露出了目前存在的種種問(wèn)題,其中最具有爭(zhēng)議性的是宏觀調(diào)控行為是否具有可訴性,這也是我國(guó)目前亟需解決的一個(gè)問(wèn)題。 對(duì)宏觀調(diào)控行為進(jìn)行司法審查是必要的,是實(shí)現(xiàn)宏觀調(diào)控目標(biāo)的需要,是權(quán)力制衡的需要,是宏觀調(diào)控法治化的需要,是宏觀調(diào)控國(guó)際化的要求,且在對(duì)宏觀調(diào)控行為進(jìn)行司法審查時(shí)可利用司法權(quán)的特有功能。同時(shí),從應(yīng)然角度而言,對(duì)宏觀調(diào)控行為進(jìn)行司法審查是可行的:一是《憲法》第二條、第五條和第四十一條的規(guī)定為宏觀調(diào)控行為接受司法審查提供了憲法依據(jù),二是宏觀調(diào)控行為不是國(guó)家行為,其不應(yīng)被必然地排除在司法審查之外,三是通過(guò)司法體制改革可以使宏觀調(diào)控行為具備訴的構(gòu)成要件,四是由于只是對(duì)宏觀調(diào)控行為的合法性進(jìn)行司法審查,所以司法審查過(guò)程具有可操作性,五是對(duì)宏觀調(diào)控行為進(jìn)行司法審查有國(guó)際經(jīng)驗(yàn)可借鑒。 但是,并不是所有的宏觀調(diào)控行為都具有可訴性,可訴的宏觀調(diào)控行為是分兩個(gè)層次的:應(yīng)訴且較易訴的宏觀調(diào)控行為和應(yīng)訴而難訴的宏觀調(diào)控行為。 考慮實(shí)現(xiàn)宏觀調(diào)控行為可訴的途徑時(shí),在借鑒他國(guó)經(jīng)驗(yàn)的基礎(chǔ)上必須得結(jié)合我國(guó)的國(guó)情。宏觀調(diào)控具體執(zhí)行行為可以通過(guò)傳統(tǒng)的“三大訴訟”解決其可訴性,但在通過(guò)傳統(tǒng)的“三大訴訟”對(duì)其進(jìn)行司法審查時(shí)要考慮符合宏觀調(diào)控行為特點(diǎn)的特殊規(guī)則。通過(guò)對(duì)違憲審查制度的構(gòu)建,為對(duì)宏觀調(diào)控決策行為和宏觀調(diào)控抽象執(zhí)行行為進(jìn)行司法審查提供了可行的途徑。同時(shí),將公益訴訟制度和“法院之友”制度引入宏觀調(diào)控訴訟中有著重大的意義。
[Abstract]:More and more attention has been paid to macro-control, which also plays a great role in the national economic management. But at the same time, in the operation of macro-control in our country, the existing problems have been gradually exposed. The most controversial issue is whether macro-control is actionable or not, which is an urgent problem in China. It is necessary to conduct judicial review of macro-control behavior, the need to achieve the goal of macro-control, the need for power checks and balances, the need for the legalization of macro-control, and the requirement for internationalization of macro-control. At the same time, it is feasible to carry on the judicial review to the macro-control behavior from the point of view of the ought to be: first, the second article of the Constitution, The provisions of articles 5th and 41th provide a constitutional basis for the acceptance of judicial review of macro-control acts. Second, macro-control acts are not acts of state, and they should not necessarily be excluded from judicial review. Third, through the reform of the judicial system, we can make the macro-control behavior have the constitutive elements of litigation, and fourth, because of the judicial review of the legitimacy of the macro-control behavior, the judicial review process has maneuverability. Fifth, there is international experience for the judicial review of macro-control behavior. However, not all macro-control behaviors are actionable, and the actionable macro-control behavior is divided into two levels: the appealable and easy to sue macro-control behavior and the justiciable macro-control behavior that is difficult to sue. When considering the way to realize the actionable behavior of macro-control, we must combine the national conditions of our country on the basis of drawing lessons from the experience of other countries. The concrete execution of macro-control can be solved by the traditional "three major litigation". However, the special rules which accord with the characteristics of macro-control should be taken into account in the judicial review through the traditional "three major litigation", and the constitution of the unconstitutional review system should be adopted. It provides a feasible way for judicial review of macro-control decision-making behavior and macro-control abstract executive behavior. At the same time, it is of great significance to introduce public interest litigation system and "amicus curiae" system into macro-control litigation.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：湖南大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2009
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D925.3

【引證文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 康小蕊;宏觀調(diào)控行為可訴性問(wèn)題研究[D];江西財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué);2010年

，

本文編號(hào)：1498267