股權眾籌融資的法律風險及其規(guī)制
發(fā)布時間:2018-01-16 08:15
本文關鍵詞:股權眾籌融資的法律風險及其規(guī)制 出處:《河北大學》2017年碩士論文 論文類型:學位論文
更多相關文章: 股權眾籌 互聯(lián)網(wǎng)融資 法律風險 規(guī)制措施
【摘要】:股權眾籌融資是近幾年新興的融資模式面臨著不少的法律風險,但同時對于小微初創(chuàng)企業(yè)來說,它有利于降低融資成本、提高融資效率,同時也拓寬了融資渠道。在股權眾籌融資中,涉及三對法律關系,分別是融資者與眾籌平臺、投資者與眾籌平臺、融資者與投資者,每一個主體在股權眾籌融資的活動中又潛伏著針對性的風險。融資者可能涉嫌非法吸收公眾存款或者非法發(fā)行證券,甚至本企業(yè)知識產(chǎn)權被侵犯。投資者面臨自身掌握信息少,知情權容易被侵犯,可能受到欺詐,甚至在項目失敗的時候難以退出的風險。股權眾籌融資平臺面臨權利義務模糊、信息披露不足、資金管理不嚴格的風險。放眼國外,美國、英國、意大利在股權眾籌融資方面已經(jīng)有了豐富的實踐經(jīng)驗,通過對融資者設定嚴格資格和義務,適當教育保護投資者,以及對眾籌平臺要附加更多責任與義務來實現(xiàn)了風險的規(guī)制,值得我們借鑒和學習,以規(guī)制我國股權眾籌融資法律風險。加大對融資者的監(jiān)管力度,探索建立適當投資者制度,建立規(guī)范化平臺,以期將風險降到最低值是我們的終極追求。全文將分以下幾個部分加以分別介紹和論述:第一部分,在融資難的大背景下,一種依托互聯(lián)網(wǎng)平臺籌集資金的模式應運而生,在國內(nèi)外蓬勃發(fā)展,主要涉及融資者和眾籌平臺、投資者和眾籌平臺、融資者與投資者三種法律關系,此種模式有利于降低融資成本,提高融資效率,拓展融資渠道。第二部分,融資者可能涉嫌非法吸收公眾存款或非法發(fā)行證券,投資者自身掌握信息少,知情權容易被侵犯,可能受到欺詐,甚至在項目失敗的時候難以退出的風險。股權眾籌融資平臺面臨權利義務模糊、信息披露不足、資金管理不嚴格的風險。第三部分,美國、英國、意大利通過對融資者設定嚴格資格和義務,適當教育保護投資者,以及對眾籌平臺要附加更多責任與義務來實現(xiàn)了風險的規(guī)定,值得我們借鑒和學習,以規(guī)制我國股權眾籌融資法律風險。第四部分,加大對融資者的監(jiān)管力度,探索建立適當投資者制度,建立規(guī)范化平臺等方面,提出我國股權眾籌融資法律風險的規(guī)制建議。
[Abstract]:Stock raising and financing is a new financing model in recent years facing a lot of legal risks, but at the same time for small and micro start-ups, it is conducive to reduce the financing costs and improve the efficiency of financing. At the same time, it also broadens the financing channels. In the financing of stock rights, there are three pairs of legal relations, namely, the financier and the crowdfunding platform, the investor and crowdfunding platform, the financier and the investor. Each subject in the stock raising and raising funds in the activities of the potential for targeted risks. Financiers may be suspected of illegally taking in public deposits or illegal issuance of securities. Even the intellectual property rights of the enterprise are infringed. Investors face little information, the right to know is easy to be infringed, and may be fraudulently. Even when the project fails, it is difficult to withdraw the risk. The stock raising and financing platform faces the risk of vague rights and obligations, insufficient information disclosure, and the capital management is not strict. Look abroad, the United States, the United Kingdom. Italy has a wealth of practical experience in the financing of equity crowdfunding through the establishment of strict qualifications and obligations of financiers and appropriate education to protect investors. And to add more responsibilities and obligations to the crowdfunding platform to achieve the risk regulation, we should learn from, in order to regulate the legal risk of crowdfunding in our country, and strengthen the supervision of the financiers. It is our ultimate pursuit to explore the establishment of appropriate investor system and establish a standardized platform in order to reduce the risk to the lowest value. The full text will be introduced and discussed separately in the following parts: the first part. Under the background of difficult financing, a mode of raising funds based on Internet platform emerges as the times require, and it has developed vigorously at home and abroad, mainly involving financiers and crowdfunding platforms, investors and crowdfunding platforms. There are three kinds of legal relations between the financier and the investor. This mode is helpful to reduce the financing cost, improve the financing efficiency and expand the financing channel. The second part, the financier may be suspected of illegally absorbing public deposits or illegally issuing securities. Investors own little information, the right to know is easy to be infringed, may be fraudulently, even in the event of failure of the project difficult to withdraw the risk. Stock raising and financing platform is faced with vague rights and obligations, insufficient information disclosure. The third part, the United States, the United Kingdom, Italy, by imposing strict qualifications and obligations on financiers, appropriate education to protect investors. And to the public funding platform to add more responsibilities and obligations to achieve the risk of the provisions, we should learn from and learn, in order to regulate the legal risk of crowdfunding in China. 4th part, to increase the supervision of financiers. This paper probes into the establishment of appropriate investor system and the establishment of standardized platform, and puts forward some suggestions for regulating the legal risk of public financing of stock rights in China.
【學位授予單位】:河北大學
【學位級別】:碩士
【學位授予年份】:2017
【分類號】:D922.287
【相似文獻】
相關期刊論文 前5條
1 ;西部籌融資四條新思路[J];領導決策信息;2002年42期
2 ;北京市首都公路發(fā)展集團有限公司 服務人民 奉獻社會[J];w,
本文編號:1432279
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/jingjifalunwen/1432279.html