本文關(guān)鍵詞：跨國(guó)商業(yè)賄賂域外管轄權(quán)的法律研究　出處：《貴州大學(xué)》2015年碩士論文　論文類(lèi)型：學(xué)位論文

  更多相關(guān)文章： 跨國(guó)商業(yè)賄賂 管轄原則 協(xié)調(diào)原則 法律建議

【摘要】：隨著跨國(guó)商業(yè)賄賂案件頻發(fā),各國(guó)加強(qiáng)了規(guī)制跨國(guó)商業(yè)賄賂的立法,如美國(guó)的《反海外賄賂法》等。因?yàn)榭鐕?guó)商業(yè)賄賂具有涉外的特點(diǎn),存在多種管轄原則,各個(gè)國(guó)家和國(guó)際組織對(duì)這些管轄原則的法律規(guī)定內(nèi)容不完全相同,解釋的也存在差異,甚至對(duì)某些內(nèi)容不認(rèn)可,這就引起了各國(guó)間管轄矛盾。為了解決這些矛盾,各國(guó)或國(guó)際組織紛紛出臺(tái)了相關(guān)法律法規(guī)。隨著我國(guó)日益強(qiáng)大,愈來(lái)愈多的大型公司走出國(guó)門(mén),也有越來(lái)越多的外國(guó)公司扎根中國(guó),加強(qiáng)對(duì)這些法律法規(guī)的研究,有重大的理論意義、現(xiàn)實(shí)意義和實(shí)踐意義。本文在闡述跨國(guó)商業(yè)賄賂域外管轄理論的基礎(chǔ)上,運(yùn)用案例研究方法,以輝瑞案和葛蘭素史克案為研究對(duì)象,充分闡述管轄原則和管轄沖突協(xié)調(diào)原則,結(jié)合我國(guó)立法現(xiàn)狀,總結(jié)出完善我國(guó)跨國(guó)商業(yè)賄賂域外管轄權(quán)各項(xiàng)原則與協(xié)調(diào)域外管轄權(quán)沖突原則的法律對(duì)策。本文共分為三個(gè)部分:第一章主要論述了商業(yè)賄賂基本理論以及管轄權(quán)的相關(guān)理論。第二章主要結(jié)合案例評(píng)析國(guó)外關(guān)于商業(yè)賄賂域外管轄方面的法律。這是本章的重點(diǎn),通過(guò)比較可知,對(duì)于域外賄賂犯罪,英國(guó)法比美國(guó)法規(guī)制更加嚴(yán)厲,但都具有域外效力。第三章通過(guò)分析我國(guó)關(guān)于域外管轄權(quán)的立法現(xiàn)狀,指出域外管轄原則需要改進(jìn)的地方,進(jìn)而總結(jié)出完善我國(guó)跨國(guó)商業(yè)賄賂域外管轄權(quán)各項(xiàng)原則與協(xié)調(diào)域外管轄權(quán)沖突原則的法律對(duì)策。
[Abstract]:With the frequent occurrence of transnational commercial bribery cases, various countries have strengthened their legislation to regulate transnational commercial bribery, such as the Anti-overseas bribery Act of the United States, etc. Because transnational commercial bribery has the characteristics of foreign affairs, there are many jurisdictional principles. The legal provisions of the various States and international organizations on these principles of jurisdiction are not identical in content, in different interpretations, or even in respect of certain elements. In order to solve these contradictions, countries or international organizations have issued relevant laws and regulations. With the growing strength of our country, more and more large companies go abroad. There are more and more foreign companies rooted in China, strengthen the study of these laws and regulations, has great theoretical significance, practical significance and practical significance. With the Pfizer case and GlaxoSmithKline case as the object of study, this paper fully expounds the principle of jurisdiction and the principle of coordination of jurisdiction conflict, combined with the current situation of legislation in China. This paper summarizes the legal countermeasures of perfecting the principles of extraterritorial jurisdiction of transnational commercial bribery and coordinating the principle of conflict of extraterritorial jurisdiction. The first chapter mainly discusses the basic theory of commercial bribery and related theories of jurisdiction. The second chapter mainly analyzes the foreign laws on the extraterritorial jurisdiction of commercial bribery in combination with cases. This is the focus of this chapter. Through comparison, we can know that the British law is more severe than the United States, but has extraterritorial effect. Chapter three analyzes the status of legislation on extraterritorial jurisdiction in China. The author points out that the principle of extraterritorial jurisdiction needs to be improved, and sums up the legal countermeasures to perfect the principles of extraterritorial jurisdiction of transnational commercial bribery and to coordinate the principle of conflict of extraterritorial jurisdiction in China.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：貴州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D922.294

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 "金融監(jiān)管域外管轄權(quán)"課題組;;歐美金融監(jiān)管域外管轄權(quán)擴(kuò)張影響幾何?[J];金融市場(chǎng)研究;2013年01期

2 錢(qián)學(xué)鋒;世界證券市場(chǎng)的日益國(guó)際化與美國(guó)證券法的域外管轄權(quán)(中)[J];法學(xué)評(píng)論;1994年04期

3 錢(qián)學(xué)鋒;世界證券市場(chǎng)日益國(guó)際化與美國(guó)證券法的域外管轄權(quán)(下)[J];法學(xué)評(píng)論;1994年05期

4 魏梟梟;;論反壟斷法的國(guó)際化——我國(guó)域外管轄權(quán)的協(xié)調(diào)與平衡[J];商場(chǎng)現(xiàn)代化;2013年28期

5 張翔雨;范卓斯;;美國(guó)法院域外管轄權(quán)的理論和實(shí)踐[J];現(xiàn)代法學(xué);1985年04期

6 張淑鈿;;香港域外管轄權(quán)制度探析[J];武陵學(xué)刊;2010年06期

7 錢(qián)學(xué)鋒;世界證券市場(chǎng)的日益國(guó)際化與美國(guó)證券法的域外管轄權(quán)(上)[J];法學(xué)評(píng)論;1994年03期

8 孟雁北;;競(jìng)爭(zhēng)執(zhí)法機(jī)構(gòu)間合作協(xié)議問(wèn)題研究[J];中國(guó)社會(huì)科學(xué)院研究生院學(xué)報(bào);2009年04期

9 杜濤;;美國(guó)證券法域外管轄權(quán):終結(jié)還是復(fù)活?——評(píng)美國(guó)聯(lián)邦最高法院Morrison案及《多德—弗蘭克法》第929P(b)條[J];證券法苑;2012年02期

10 ;[J];;年期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前3條

1 吳炯;有關(guān)《反壟斷法》域外管轄權(quán)幾個(gè)問(wèn)題的商榷[N];中國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)時(shí)報(bào);2004年

2 吳炯;關(guān)于反壟斷立法的幾點(diǎn)建議（下）[N];中國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)時(shí)報(bào);2005年

3 吳炯;反壟斷法域外管轄權(quán)的管轄和反管轄[N];市場(chǎng)報(bào);2000年

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 陳竹華;證券法域外管轄權(quán)的合理限度[D];中國(guó)政法大學(xué);2006年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前5條

1 劉愛(ài)珍;跨國(guó)商業(yè)賄賂域外管轄權(quán)的法律研究[D];貴州大學(xué);2015年

2 李旭斐;美國(guó)證券法域外管轄權(quán)的新發(fā)展[D];復(fù)旦大學(xué);2012年

3 顧斌;跨國(guó)并購(gòu)反壟斷規(guī)制域外管轄權(quán)沖突及協(xié)調(diào)[D];華東政法大學(xué);2007年

4 陳丹丹;美國(guó)《反海外腐敗法》域外管轄權(quán)的合理性研究[D];上海交通大學(xué);2012年

5 呂菲菲;論反跨國(guó)商業(yè)賄賂中的域外管轄問(wèn)題[D];華東政法大學(xué);2014年

，

本文編號(hào)：1424272