我國離婚財產(chǎn)分割中的婦女權(quán)益保護研究
[Abstract]:With the rapid development of China's economy and society, people's ideas are constantly changing. People's outlook on marriage and love is becoming more and more complicated by the economic growth and the civilization of society. Since 2004, the divorce rate has been rising and the number of divorced women has been increasing. Although, at present, the status of women in our country has been greatly improved, on the whole, women are still in a vulnerable position, and therefore, in order to achieve substantive equality in the division of divorced property, full consideration should be given to the disadvantaged status of women, To give adequate protection, but the actual situation is one of the people to sigh. Therefore, this article starts from the legislative and judicial aspects, analyzes the crux of the problem, and examines the provisions of extraterritorial law, and puts forward relevant suggestions. The first part of this paper introduces the current situation of the protection of the rights and interests of divorced women in the division of divorce property. At the legislative level, the Marriage Law of our country stipulates the principle of protecting the interests of women and the system of divorce relief in the division of divorce property. However, the protection of women's rights and interests has not played a substantial role. In addition, in the aspect of judicial practice, this paper summarizes the current situation of judicial practice by collecting cases, and sums up the existing problems according to the present situation. The second part of this paper, on the basis of the first part, in-depth analysis of the reasons leading to the lack of protection of property division rights and interests of divorced women in China. In the aspect of legislation, the regulation of husband and wife's common property is unreasonable, the principle of division of divorce property is too formalized, and the system of divorce relief is lack of maneuverability, all of which are unreasonable and need to be adjusted urgently. In judicial practice, the vague application of the burden of proof and the limitation of legislation make it difficult to protect the property rights and interests of divorced women. The third part of this paper, the reference and reference of extraterritorial law is also a method to perfect the domestic legal system, on the basis of examining the relevant system of extraterritorial law, taking the advantages of people and perfecting the legal system of the division of divorce property in our country. The fourth part of this paper, according to the introduction, summary and analysis of the first three parts, puts forward perfect suggestions to protect the rights and interests of divorced women in the division of property. The main measures are to improve the joint property system of husband and wife by increasing the human capital evaluation and compensation system and establishing the property notarization system. In order to perfect the divorce property division system of our country, we should replace the principle of equality with the principle of fairness, clarify the principle of care, the principle of compensation, the principle of compensation and the applicable provisions of the principle of help. Finally, by perfecting the burden of proof system of divorce women in the divorce property division system to protect their property rights and interests.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:寧波大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2015
【分類號】:D923.9
【相似文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 張麗娜;趙耀;;淺析離婚財產(chǎn)分割[J];佳木斯教育學(xué)院學(xué)報;2014年02期
2 碧沙;;婚錢之 麻辣篇——好聚好散:離婚財產(chǎn)分割[J];大眾理財顧問;2004年06期
3 李彥林;;離婚財產(chǎn)分割的缺陷[J];科技信息(科學(xué)教研);2007年27期
4 余金枝;;離婚財產(chǎn)分割制度適用原則簡析[J];法制與社會;2008年04期
5 楊治;;試論我國離婚財產(chǎn)分割制度中存在的問題[J];經(jīng)營管理者;2009年18期
6 李紅英;汪遠(yuǎn)忠;李勝坡;;關(guān)于民國離婚財產(chǎn)分割問題的思考[J];前沿;2010年12期
7 曾禎;;離婚財產(chǎn)分割中的婦女權(quán)益保護研究[J];黑河學(xué)刊;2011年02期
8 李紅釗;;離婚財產(chǎn)分割案例簡析[J];法制與經(jīng)濟(中旬);2012年08期
9 ;兒子能參與離婚財產(chǎn)分割嗎[J];伴侶;2011年05期
10 蔣林;;離婚財產(chǎn)分割 把“丑話說在前面”[J];社區(qū);2011年19期
相關(guān)會議論文 前1條
1 韓振才;蘇杰利;;三例鑒定人出庭效果分析[A];中國法醫(yī)學(xué)會法醫(yī)臨床學(xué)學(xué)術(shù)研討會論文集[C];2005年
相關(guān)重要報紙文章 前10條
1 楊書蘭;對離婚財產(chǎn)分割制度的幾點思考[N];江蘇經(jīng)濟報;2012年
2 羅磊;協(xié)議離婚財產(chǎn)分割不可隨意反悔[N];江蘇法制報;2013年
3 劉艷華;應(yīng)加強離婚財產(chǎn)分割與執(zhí)行標(biāo)的沖突立法[N];法制日報;2003年
4 翁趙力;“80后”離婚財產(chǎn)分割變簡單[N];杭州日報;2007年
5 金宏偉;從一起離婚財產(chǎn)分割案說起[N];江蘇科技報;2007年
6 吳曉芳;離婚財產(chǎn)分割焦點[N];中國婦女報;2004年
7 本報評論員 唐學(xué)鵬;高凈值人群的“理性離婚”[N];21世紀(jì)經(jīng)濟報道;2012年
8 記者 譚亞明;七個審理難點困擾離婚財產(chǎn)分割[N];中國人口報;2008年
9 吳曉芳;離婚財產(chǎn)分割焦點反悔協(xié)議 逃債 房產(chǎn)[N];北京日報;2003年
10 本報駐首爾記者 王剛;韓國:20年全職家務(wù)作為分產(chǎn)依據(jù)[N];法制日報;2011年
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前10條
1 周春秋;中德離婚財產(chǎn)分割制度比較研究[D];中國政法大學(xué);2015年
2 解維婷;離婚財產(chǎn)分割協(xié)議第三人約款效力研究[D];東南大學(xué);2015年
3 徐秀葉;論我國離婚財產(chǎn)分割制度的完善[D];延邊大學(xué);2016年
4 嵇惠化;我國離婚財產(chǎn)分割中的婦女權(quán)益保護研究[D];寧波大學(xué);2015年
5 王舒婷;我國離婚財產(chǎn)分割制度研究[D];天津商業(yè)大學(xué);2012年
6 李蘭蘭;離婚財產(chǎn)分割中女方權(quán)益保護研究[D];大連海事大學(xué);2015年
7 張蕾;論我國離婚財產(chǎn)分割及救濟制度[D];暨南大學(xué);2013年
8 袁月影;涉外離婚財產(chǎn)分割的法律問題研究[D];南昌大學(xué);2014年
9 于赫男;我國離婚財產(chǎn)分割制度的社會性別分析[D];吉林大學(xué);2012年
10 王景艷;離婚財產(chǎn)分割法律適用問題探究[D];西南政法大學(xué);2015年
,本文編號:2451689
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/hyflw/2451689.html