【摘要】：傳統(tǒng)的倫理道德觀念對(duì)我國(guó)的婚姻家庭關(guān)系產(chǎn)生了深遠(yuǎn)影響,在婚姻家庭關(guān)系中人們常常忽略自然人作為個(gè)體所應(yīng)享有的權(quán)利,特別是女性的個(gè)體利益,如人身權(quán)利、人格利益。傳統(tǒng)觀念認(rèn)為損害賠償往往發(fā)生在家庭外部,在夫妻間則不發(fā)揮作用,以致對(duì)侵犯夫妻一方人身、財(cái)產(chǎn)權(quán)行為缺乏應(yīng)有的制裁機(jī)制和補(bǔ)償措施。2001年《婚姻法》修改之前,婚內(nèi)夫妻侵權(quán)行為多靠風(fēng)俗習(xí)慣、人們內(nèi)心的信念以及社會(huì)輿論來(lái)調(diào)整,所謂清官難斷家務(wù)事,公權(quán)力是很難介入夫妻間侵權(quán)法律關(guān)系的,道德輿論的譴責(zé)往往成為懲處夫妻間侵權(quán)行為的主要手段。然而這種道德譴責(zé)不僅缺乏強(qiáng)制力,更缺乏威懾力,也不能對(duì)受害方身體上和精神上受到的損傷進(jìn)行補(bǔ)償。因此,本文的主要目的就在于對(duì)婚內(nèi)夫妻侵權(quán)損害賠償?shù)睦碚摷傲⒎ㄟM(jìn)行一番梳理,以正本清源,對(duì)構(gòu)建婚內(nèi)夫妻侵權(quán)損害賠償?shù)谋匾宰鞒銮∪缙浞值脑u(píng)價(jià),并對(duì)構(gòu)建婚內(nèi)夫妻侵權(quán)損害賠償制度中存在的問(wèn)題提出自己的看法和相關(guān)的立法建議,為構(gòu)建我國(guó)婚內(nèi)夫妻侵權(quán)損害賠償制度作理論上的探索和鋪墊。本文的主體部分一共包含以下幾章： 第一章對(duì)選題的意義和背景進(jìn)行闡述,并介紹了國(guó)內(nèi)和國(guó)外對(duì)婚內(nèi)侵權(quán)損害賠償制度的研究動(dòng)態(tài)以及完善我國(guó)婚內(nèi)夫妻侵權(quán)損害賠償制度的啟示,以及論文的研究方法。 第二章對(duì)婚內(nèi)夫妻侵權(quán)損害賠償進(jìn)行界定,界定其概念、特征、構(gòu)成要件,并分析婚內(nèi)夫妻侵權(quán)損害賠償制度與現(xiàn)行離婚損害賠償制度的聯(lián)系和區(qū)別。 第三章著重分析設(shè)立婚內(nèi)夫妻侵權(quán)損害賠償制度的必要性和可行性,結(jié)合學(xué)界理論觀點(diǎn),提出文章自己的觀點(diǎn)。 第四章對(duì)國(guó)外相關(guān)立法和司法實(shí)踐經(jīng)驗(yàn)進(jìn)行介紹,通過(guò)比較研究,為我國(guó)構(gòu)建婚內(nèi)夫妻侵權(quán)損害賠償制度提供經(jīng)驗(yàn)借鑒。 第五章對(duì)構(gòu)建我國(guó)婚內(nèi)夫妻侵權(quán)損害賠償制度進(jìn)行構(gòu)想,提出自己的見(jiàn)解。
[Abstract]:The traditional ethical and moral concept has exerted a profound influence on the marriage and family relations in our country. In marriage and family relations, people often ignore the rights that natural persons should enjoy as individuals, especially the individual interests of women, such as personal rights. Personal interests. The traditional idea is that damages often occur outside the family and do not play a role between husband and wife, resulting in a lack of appropriate sanctions and compensation measures for violations of property rights of one of the spouses. Before the Amendment of the Marriage Act of 2001, there was a lack of appropriate sanctions and compensation measures for violations of property rights of one of the spouses. Marital tort depends more on customs and customs, people's inner beliefs and public opinion to adjust, the so-called clean officials difficult to break housework, public power is very difficult to intervene in the legal relationship of tort between husband and wife. The condemnation of moral opinion often becomes the main means of punishing husband and wife for infringement. However, this kind of moral condemnation is not only lack of force, but also lack of deterrence, nor can it compensate the injured party for the physical and mental damage. Therefore, the main purpose of this paper is to sort out the theory and legislation of matrimonial tort damages, in order to make a proper evaluation of the necessity of constructing marital tort damages. At the same time, the author puts forward his own opinions and relevant legislative suggestions on the problems existing in the construction of marital tort damages system, and makes theoretical exploration and paving the way for the construction of our country's marital tort damages compensation system. The main part of this paper consists of the following chapters: the first chapter describes the significance and background of the topic. It also introduces the domestic and foreign research trends of marital tort compensation system, and the enlightenment of perfecting the marital tort compensation system in our country, as well as the research methods of this paper. The second chapter defines the marital tort damages, defines its concept, characteristics, constituent elements, and analyzes the relationship and differences between the matrimonial tort compensation system and the current divorce damage compensation system. The third chapter focuses on the necessity and feasibility of establishing the marital tort compensation system, and puts forward the author's own point of view in combination with the academic theory. The fourth chapter introduces the experience of foreign legislation and judicial practice, through the comparative study, provides a reference for the construction of marital tort compensation system in our country. The fifth chapter constructs our country marital couple tort damage compensation system to carry on the conception, proposed own opinion.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：中央民族大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號(hào)】：D923.9

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 曹賢信;;婚內(nèi)侵權(quán)民事責(zé)任與立法構(gòu)想[J];重慶社會(huì)科學(xué);2009年03期

2 張迎秀;;婚內(nèi)損害賠償制度研究[J];東岳論叢;2007年04期

3 裴樺;;也談婚內(nèi)共同財(cái)產(chǎn)分割 兼評(píng)最高人民法院《關(guān)于適用〈婚姻法〉若干問(wèn)題的解釋(三)》(草稿)第15條[J];法律適用;2010年01期

4 陳葦;離婚損害賠償法律適用若干問(wèn)題探討[J];法商研究(中南政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào));2002年02期

5 王金堂;;婚內(nèi)人身?yè)p害賠償問(wèn)題研究[J];法學(xué)雜志;2010年08期

6 蔣月;;改革開(kāi)放三十年中國(guó)離婚法研究回顧與展望[J];法學(xué)家;2009年01期

7 袁志麗;;構(gòu)建我國(guó)婚內(nèi)損害賠償制度的思考[J];法治論壇;2009年03期

8 滕艷軍;劉娟;;論婚內(nèi)損害賠償制度的構(gòu)建[J];桂林師范高等�？茖W(xué)校學(xué)報(bào)(綜合版;2006年04期

9 李黎;論婚內(nèi)損害賠償[J];河南大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2003年04期

10 朱云霞;;淺析婚內(nèi)人格侵權(quán)的民事責(zé)任[J];河南司法警官職業(yè)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2008年02期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前10條

1 鄧紅虹;夫妻婚內(nèi)侵權(quán)之損害賠償[D];中國(guó)政法大學(xué);2010年

2 劉磊;婚內(nèi)侵權(quán)損害賠償法律問(wèn)題研究[D];山東經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)院;2011年

3 張艷娥;婚內(nèi)侵權(quán)民事責(zé)任在婚姻法中的立法構(gòu)想[D];河南大學(xué);2011年

4 董倩歐;夫妻婚內(nèi)侵權(quán)研究[D];華東政法大學(xué);2011年

5 溫正偉;婚內(nèi)侵權(quán)民事責(zé)任探討[D];復(fù)旦大學(xué);2011年

6 劉建;婚內(nèi)侵權(quán)責(zé)任研究[D];廣東商學(xué)院;2011年

7 張莉;家庭暴力問(wèn)題研究[D];廈門(mén)大學(xué);2002年

8 王玲;家庭暴力的界定與法律防控[D];廈門(mén)大學(xué);2002年

9 陳飛;我國(guó)家庭暴力的民事責(zé)任問(wèn)題初探[D];廣西大學(xué);2004年

10 皮現(xiàn)眾;家庭暴力及其司法救濟(jì)[D];蘇州大學(xué);2004年

，

本文編號(hào)：2441500