配偶權(quán)及其侵權(quán)行為研究
發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-12-14 06:42
【摘要】：配偶權(quán)在我國是一項(xiàng)頗有爭(zhēng)議的權(quán)利。我國立法上并未明確規(guī)定配偶權(quán)及其保護(hù)制度，但在司法實(shí)踐中，侵害配偶權(quán)問題卻日益突出，尤其是以第三者插足他人家庭及與配偶一方通奸案件表現(xiàn)得尤為明顯。值得欣喜的是，2001年新修訂《婚姻法》加大了對(duì)配偶權(quán)的保護(hù)力度，配偶權(quán)問題在我國日益受到重視。 筆者在消化吸收學(xué)者們諸多研究成果的基礎(chǔ)上，綜合運(yùn)用婚姻法、侵權(quán)行為法等法律知識(shí)，試圖對(duì)配偶權(quán)及其侵權(quán)行為作一些理論探討，提出自己的一些不成熟的見解，以圖對(duì)我國的配偶權(quán)及其侵權(quán)問題有一個(gè)較完整的把握，為完善我國的民事立法提供一種思路。 全文共分三部分，總計(jì)約36000字。 第一部分 引論：(民事)權(quán)利與侵權(quán) 筆者介紹了民法上權(quán)利的概念、本質(zhì)及其分類。配偶權(quán)作為一項(xiàng)重要的民事權(quán)利，屬于身份權(quán)、非財(cái)產(chǎn)權(quán)。權(quán)利形成后，權(quán)利的享有者必然要去行使權(quán)利，以實(shí)現(xiàn)自己的權(quán)利。在任何一個(gè)法律關(guān)系中，權(quán)利與義務(wù)是相互對(duì)立、相互依存并相互聯(lián)系的。違反限制的權(quán)利行使即構(gòu)成權(quán)利濫用，而對(duì)于他人來說則構(gòu)成侵權(quán)；拒絕履行義務(wù)同樣可能構(gòu)成對(duì)他人權(quán)利實(shí)現(xiàn)的妨礙，從而構(gòu)成侵權(quán)。配偶權(quán)是特定主體即配偶之間的一項(xiàng)重要的民事權(quán)利，具體表現(xiàn)為一系列配偶間的權(quán)利與義務(wù)。配偶雙方都有追求實(shí)現(xiàn)自己配偶權(quán)的權(quán)利，而義務(wù)主體則負(fù)有不得侵害配偶權(quán)的義務(wù)。 第二部分 配偶權(quán)論 一、配偶的概念和性質(zhì) 配偶最終反映的是合法婚姻關(guān)系男女兩性親屬身份的對(duì)應(yīng)稱謂，夫妻互為配偶。我國民事立法確認(rèn)配偶為親屬之一種，與血親、姻親共同構(gòu)成親屬的三大種類。 二、配偶權(quán)的概念 (一)配偶權(quán)的演變 (二)配偶權(quán)的概念 筆者在總結(jié)各種觀點(diǎn)的基礎(chǔ)上指出：其一，配偶權(quán)的存在以合法有效的夫妻關(guān)系為基礎(chǔ)；其二，配偶權(quán)屬于身份權(quán)；其三，配偶權(quán)專屬于夫妻；其四，配偶權(quán)表現(xiàn)為夫妻相互間的權(quán)利義務(wù)。筆者對(duì)配偶權(quán)定義如下：配偶權(quán)是指，，基于合法婚姻關(guān)系成立的夫妻之間互享權(quán)利，互負(fù)義務(wù)的基本身份權(quán)。 三、配偶權(quán)的特征:第一，權(quán)利主體的特定性;第二，權(quán)利客體的利 益性;第三，權(quán)利義務(wù)的協(xié)同性。 四、配偶權(quán)的性質(zhì)筆者認(rèn)為，對(duì)于配偶相互之間來說，配偶權(quán)表現(xiàn) 出相對(duì)權(quán)的性質(zhì)，對(duì)于第三人來說，配偶權(quán)具有絕對(duì)權(quán)的性質(zhì)，配偶權(quán)是 絕對(duì)權(quán)與相對(duì)權(quán)的統(tǒng)一;同時(shí)筆者主張配偶權(quán)兼有支配權(quán)與請(qǐng)求權(quán)的性質(zhì). 五、配偶權(quán)的內(nèi)容在研究各種學(xué)說的墓礎(chǔ)上，筆者指出配偶權(quán)主要 由以下具體內(nèi)容構(gòu)成:(1)夫妻姓氏權(quán);(2)住所決定權(quán);(3)同居權(quán); (4)貞操忠實(shí)權(quán);(6)日常家事代理權(quán);(7)相互扶助權(quán)。 第三部分配偶權(quán)俊權(quán)行為論 一、問題的提出:侵害配偶權(quán)的行為屬于侵權(quán)行為，應(yīng)受侵權(quán)行為法 調(diào)整 二、侵害配偶權(quán)民事責(zé)任的構(gòu)成要件在分析一般侵權(quán)行為民事責(zé)任 構(gòu)成要件的基礎(chǔ)上，筆者認(rèn)為侵害配偶權(quán)的民事責(zé)任同樣由四個(gè)要件構(gòu)成， 即:違法行為、損害事實(shí)、因果關(guān)系和主觀過錯(cuò)。 三、配偶權(quán)侵權(quán)行為類型研究 根據(jù)侵權(quán)行為法理論，結(jié)合配偶權(quán)的自身特點(diǎn)，筆者認(rèn)為侵害配偶權(quán) 的侵權(quán)行為按照不同的標(biāo)準(zhǔn)，可做如下分類:(1)內(nèi)部侵權(quán)行為和外部侵 權(quán)行為;(2)積極的侵權(quán)行為和消極的侵權(quán)行為;(3)單獨(dú)侵權(quán)行為和共 同侵權(quán)行為;(4)直接侵權(quán)行為和間接侵權(quán)行為.進(jìn)一步，筆者結(jié)合配偶 權(quán)的各項(xiàng)具體內(nèi)容予以重點(diǎn)剖析侵害配偶權(quán)侵權(quán)行為的各種表現(xiàn)形式。 四、在侵害配偶權(quán)的典型行為之外，還對(duì)一些行為是否侵害了配偶權(quán) 存有爭(zhēng)議，如家庭暴力問題、“婚內(nèi)強(qiáng)奸問題”、賣淫縹娟問題、網(wǎng)絡(luò)虛擬 婚戀問題，筆者就此提出了自己的見解. 五、對(duì)受侵害配偶權(quán)的救濟(jì)筆者針對(duì)各類侵害配偶權(quán)的侵權(quán)行為， 提出了各自適用的救濟(jì)手段，并對(duì)我國現(xiàn)行法律對(duì)受侵害配偶權(quán)救濟(jì)的規(guī) 定進(jìn)行了評(píng)析。 六、完善我國配偶權(quán)法律保護(hù)的制度設(shè)計(jì) 筆者主張:在婚姻家庭法中明確配偶權(quán)的具體內(nèi)容;在侵權(quán)行為法中 明確將配偶權(quán)納入保護(hù)范圍.確立婚姻住所由夫妻平等協(xié)商制度;確立日 常家事代理權(quán)制度;確立別居制度。明確配偶權(quán)的民法保護(hù)，尤其是第三 人民事責(zé)任的承擔(dān)。明確侵害配偶權(quán)的民事責(zé)任承擔(dān)方式。
[Abstract]:Spouse rights are a controversial right in our country. The right of the spouse and its protection system are not defined in the legislation of our country, but in the practice of the judicial practice, the problem of the infringement of the right of the spouse is becoming more and more prominent, especially in the case of the third party's family and the case of adultery with the spouse. It is gratifying to note that the new amendments to the Marriage Act in 2001 have increased the protection of the right to a spouse, and that the issue of the right to a spouse is becoming more and more important in my country. Based on the research results of the scholars and the scholars, the author makes a comprehensive use of the legal knowledge such as the marriage law and the tort law, and tries to make some theoretical research on the right of the spouse and the tort, and put forward his own. Some unripe views, in order to have a more complete understanding of our country's right of spousal and its infringement, in order to improve our country's civil rights The legislation provides a way of thinking. The full text is divided into three parts, a total of about 36000 Word. Part One: (Civil The author of the right and the tort introduces the right in the civil law The concept, nature and its classification. The right of the spouse, as an important civil right, belongs to the right of identity. Non-property right. After the right is formed, the enjoyment of the right is bound to exercise the right to realize its own in any of that legal relationship, the rights and obligations are mutually opposite, interdependent and interrelated. the exercise of the right to a violation of the restriction constitutes an abuse of the right and, for others, if that right of the spouse is a specific one, the right of the spouse is specific. One of the important civil rights between the spouses is the rights and obligations of a series of spouses. Spouses Both sides have the pursuit of the realization The right of the right of the spouse, and the body of the obligation has the obligation not to violate the right of the spouse. The second part of the right of the spouse First, the spouse's concept and the nature of the spouse ultimately reflect the relationship between women and men in a legitimate marriage The right to the identity of a gender. The husband and wife shall be referred to as each other. 2. The concept of the spouse's right to be a family. (I) The evolution of the right of the spouse (2) the concept of the right of the spouse On the basis of summarizing the various points of view, it is pointed out that the existence of the right of the spouse is based on the legal and effective relationship of the husband and wife; the other, the right of the spouse belongs to the right of identity. Third, the right of the spouse is a husband and wife; and the right of the spouse is the right of the husband and wife. The author's definition of the right of the spouse is as follows: The right of spouse refers to the right and mutual negative obligation of the husband and wife established on the basis of the relationship of the legitimate marriage. the right to basic identity. sign: First, the subject of the right Qualitative; second, the benefit of the object of the right the nature of the rights and obligations of the third and the third parties. in that light of the author's view, the right of the spouse to the right of the spouse is relative to each other The nature of the right, for the third, the right to a spouse has an absolute The nature of the right to a spouse absolute right At the same time, the author argues that the right of the spouse has the property of the right of support and the right of claim. V. The content of the right of the spouse in the study of the tomb of various theories, the author It is pointed out that the right of the spouse is the main It is composed of the following specific contents: (1) the family name of the husband and wife (2) the right to residence; (2) the right of residence; (3) the right to cohabitation; (4) The fidelity of the chastity (6) the right of daily family agent; and (7) the right to mutual support. The third part of the right of the right of the spouse to the right of the right of the right of the right of the right, the question is raised: the infringement of the spouse the act of the right in that case of a violation, it shall be subject to the regulation of the act of tort. II. Analysis of the Elements of the Civil Liability for Infringement of the Right of Spouse civil liability of general tort On the basis of the elements, the author thinks that the civil responsibility of the right of the spouse Any act is also composed of four elements, namely, the illegal act, the damage Real, causality and subjective fault. 3. The type of the right of the spouse right is based on the tort. The theory of law, in combination with the characteristics of the right of the spouse, the author The violation of the right to a spouse, in accordance with different criteria, may The following classification is made: (1) internal and external rights violations; (2) Aggressive invasion a right act and a negative tort; (3) a single invasion. (4) The right to conduct and the co-operation; and (4) direct violations and Indirect torts. Further, the author Specific provisions in connection with the right to a spouse The content is focused on the infringement of the right of the spouse. various forms of expression. IV. In the case of an infringement of a spouse In addition to the typical behavior of the right, do some of the actions
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2004
【分類號(hào)】：D913
本文編號(hào)：2378118
[Abstract]:Spouse rights are a controversial right in our country. The right of the spouse and its protection system are not defined in the legislation of our country, but in the practice of the judicial practice, the problem of the infringement of the right of the spouse is becoming more and more prominent, especially in the case of the third party's family and the case of adultery with the spouse. It is gratifying to note that the new amendments to the Marriage Act in 2001 have increased the protection of the right to a spouse, and that the issue of the right to a spouse is becoming more and more important in my country. Based on the research results of the scholars and the scholars, the author makes a comprehensive use of the legal knowledge such as the marriage law and the tort law, and tries to make some theoretical research on the right of the spouse and the tort, and put forward his own. Some unripe views, in order to have a more complete understanding of our country's right of spousal and its infringement, in order to improve our country's civil rights The legislation provides a way of thinking. The full text is divided into three parts, a total of about 36000 Word. Part One: (Civil The author of the right and the tort introduces the right in the civil law The concept, nature and its classification. The right of the spouse, as an important civil right, belongs to the right of identity. Non-property right. After the right is formed, the enjoyment of the right is bound to exercise the right to realize its own in any of that legal relationship, the rights and obligations are mutually opposite, interdependent and interrelated. the exercise of the right to a violation of the restriction constitutes an abuse of the right and, for others, if that right of the spouse is a specific one, the right of the spouse is specific. One of the important civil rights between the spouses is the rights and obligations of a series of spouses. Spouses Both sides have the pursuit of the realization The right of the right of the spouse, and the body of the obligation has the obligation not to violate the right of the spouse. The second part of the right of the spouse First, the spouse's concept and the nature of the spouse ultimately reflect the relationship between women and men in a legitimate marriage The right to the identity of a gender. The husband and wife shall be referred to as each other. 2. The concept of the spouse's right to be a family. (I) The evolution of the right of the spouse (2) the concept of the right of the spouse On the basis of summarizing the various points of view, it is pointed out that the existence of the right of the spouse is based on the legal and effective relationship of the husband and wife; the other, the right of the spouse belongs to the right of identity. Third, the right of the spouse is a husband and wife; and the right of the spouse is the right of the husband and wife. The author's definition of the right of the spouse is as follows: The right of spouse refers to the right and mutual negative obligation of the husband and wife established on the basis of the relationship of the legitimate marriage. the right to basic identity. sign: First, the subject of the right Qualitative; second, the benefit of the object of the right the nature of the rights and obligations of the third and the third parties. in that light of the author's view, the right of the spouse to the right of the spouse is relative to each other The nature of the right, for the third, the right to a spouse has an absolute The nature of the right to a spouse absolute right At the same time, the author argues that the right of the spouse has the property of the right of support and the right of claim. V. The content of the right of the spouse in the study of the tomb of various theories, the author It is pointed out that the right of the spouse is the main It is composed of the following specific contents: (1) the family name of the husband and wife (2) the right to residence; (2) the right of residence; (3) the right to cohabitation; (4) The fidelity of the chastity (6) the right of daily family agent; and (7) the right to mutual support. The third part of the right of the right of the spouse to the right of the right of the right of the right of the right, the question is raised: the infringement of the spouse the act of the right in that case of a violation, it shall be subject to the regulation of the act of tort. II. Analysis of the Elements of the Civil Liability for Infringement of the Right of Spouse civil liability of general tort On the basis of the elements, the author thinks that the civil responsibility of the right of the spouse Any act is also composed of four elements, namely, the illegal act, the damage Real, causality and subjective fault. 3. The type of the right of the spouse right is based on the tort. The theory of law, in combination with the characteristics of the right of the spouse, the author The violation of the right to a spouse, in accordance with different criteria, may The following classification is made: (1) internal and external rights violations; (2) Aggressive invasion a right act and a negative tort; (3) a single invasion. (4) The right to conduct and the co-operation; and (4) direct violations and Indirect torts. Further, the author Specific provisions in connection with the right to a spouse The content is focused on the infringement of the right of the spouse. various forms of expression. IV. In the case of an infringement of a spouse In addition to the typical behavior of the right, do some of the actions
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2004
【分類號(hào)】：D913
【引證文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前7條
1 于廣義;論我國離婚損害賠償制度之完善[D];中國政法大學(xué);2010年
2 王瑩;論第三者侵害配偶權(quán)的民事責(zé)任[D];南京大學(xué);2011年
3 邵軍蘭;婚姻法中損害賠償制度研究[D];蘭州大學(xué);2007年
4 郭景春;配偶權(quán)與隱私權(quán)沖突問題研究[D];復(fù)旦大學(xué);2008年
5 呂媛媛;配偶權(quán)問題研究[D];河北大學(xué);2010年
6 趙凱凱;“婚外情行為”分析及婚姻關(guān)系中配偶權(quán)的保護(hù)[D];蘭州大學(xué);2012年
7 張光楠;試論配偶權(quán)[D];吉林財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué);2012年
本文編號(hào)：2378118
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/hyflw/2378118.html
教材專著
