【摘要】：虛假離婚,也就是我們通常所說的假離婚,即夫妻一方或夫妻雙方根本沒有離婚的真實(shí)內(nèi)心意思,為達(dá)到某種非法利益,通過雙方合謀或一方受對方欺騙而達(dá)到離婚目的。改革開放的發(fā)展,市場經(jīng)濟(jì)的繁榮,帶來了社會經(jīng)濟(jì)的飛速跨越,但同時在經(jīng)濟(jì)利益的巨大誘惑下,誠信問題成了困擾社會發(fā)展的障礙。在婚姻領(lǐng)域,也呈現(xiàn)出弄虛作假的惡性態(tài)勢,并且愈演愈烈,嚴(yán)重危及到債權(quán)人的合法利益,致使蒙受不同程度的困擾和侵害。甚至在很多虛假離婚案件中,出現(xiàn)無辜債權(quán)人有理說不出,眼睜睜看到自己的合法債權(quán)化為烏有卻無力挽回自己的損失。 鑒于此,如何在虛假離婚訴訟中實(shí)現(xiàn)對債權(quán)人合法利益的保護(hù)問題值得研究。筆者從夫妻共同債務(wù)的認(rèn)定及證明規(guī)則,虛假離婚訴訟證據(jù)審查及第三人撤銷之訴制度等實(shí)體法層面與程序法層面相結(jié)合的角度進(jìn)行深入分析與探討,探索建構(gòu)保護(hù)債權(quán)人合法利益的切實(shí)可行的辦法。
[Abstract]:False divorce, which is usually referred to as false divorce, means that one spouse or both husband and wife do not have the true intention of divorce at all. In order to achieve some illegal interests, the two parties collude or one side is deceived by the other party to achieve the purpose of divorce. The development of reform and opening up and the prosperity of market economy have brought the rapid leap of social economy, but at the same time, under the huge temptation of economic interests, the problem of honesty and credit has become an obstacle to the development of society. In the field of marriage, there is also a vicious situation of fraud, which is becoming more and more serious, which seriously endangers the legitimate interests of creditors and results in varying degrees of distress and infringement. Even in many false divorce cases, the emergence of innocent creditors can not justify, see their legitimate claims to be destroyed but unable to recover their losses. In view of this, how to protect the legitimate interests of creditors in false divorce proceedings is worth studying. The author analyzes and probes into the combination of substantive law and procedural law, such as the identification and proof rules of joint debt of husband and wife, the examination of evidence in false divorce proceedings and the system of action by third party. To explore practical ways to protect the legitimate interests of creditors.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：內(nèi)蒙古大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D923.9

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 張海朝;;惡意訴訟行為及其規(guī)制——以婚姻家庭案件為視角[J];法制與社會;2012年07期

2 崔山;;房屋拆遷安置中假離婚現(xiàn)象分析[J];資源與人居環(huán)境;2008年18期

3 楊穗權(quán);;民事虛假訴訟的成因及對策[J];法制與經(jīng)濟(jì)(中旬);2011年11期

4 王合靜;;案外第三人之申請?jiān)賹彊?quán)——對《審判監(jiān)督程序若干問題的解釋》第五條之解讀[J];河南師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2009年04期

5 王學(xué)東;祝新明;王惠興;馬超;;法律的生命在于運(yùn)用——從《婚姻法司法解釋(二)》第二十四條談起[J];寧波廣播電視大學(xué)學(xué)報;2012年02期

6 劉輝;牛海燕;;基于虛假訴訟的法律思考[J];企業(yè)導(dǎo)報;2012年01期

7 高原;;新房產(chǎn)政策下假離婚現(xiàn)象的法律思考[J];山西財經(jīng)大學(xué)學(xué)報;2011年S1期

8 劉艷;;虛假訴訟在婚姻家庭領(lǐng)域的規(guī)避[J];河南省政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報;2010年06期

9 崔西營;;我國離婚救濟(jì)制度之管見[J];泰安教育學(xué)院學(xué)報岱宗學(xué)刊;2011年03期

10 劉萍;;我國夫妻債務(wù)制度立法反思[J];學(xué)術(shù)論壇;2006年06期

，

本文編號：2363909