天堂国产午夜亚洲专区-少妇人妻综合久久蜜臀-国产成人户外露出视频在线-国产91传媒一区二区三区

當(dāng)前位置:主頁(yè) > 法律論文 > 婚姻法論文 >

婚內(nèi)強(qiáng)奸問(wèn)題之思考

發(fā)布時(shí)間:2018-09-17 17:22
【摘要】: 婚內(nèi)強(qiáng)奸一直是引起社會(huì)各界廣泛爭(zhēng)議的一個(gè)主題。學(xué)術(shù)上的百家齊鳴固然可喜,但司法上的不統(tǒng)一判決實(shí)在令人擔(dān)憂。性質(zhì)相同的案件得不到相同的判決,嚴(yán)重的破壞了法制的統(tǒng)一性、權(quán)威性和可預(yù)測(cè)性。我們應(yīng)該看到,婚內(nèi)強(qiáng)奸犯罪化是社會(huì)進(jìn)步和人類(lèi)思想進(jìn)一步解放的必然結(jié)果。在1996人權(quán)主題報(bào)告大會(huì)上,聯(lián)合國(guó)呼吁世界各國(guó)應(yīng)將婚內(nèi)強(qiáng)奸予以犯罪化,代表了世界立法的趨勢(shì)。而女權(quán)主義更是將性上升為一個(gè)政治學(xué)問(wèn)題,麥金農(nóng)就曾說(shuō)過(guò):“性對(duì)于女權(quán)主義的重要性就像勞動(dòng)對(duì)于馬克思主義的重要性一樣……”?梢(jiàn)“性”事關(guān)重大,需慎重對(duì)待,而婚內(nèi)強(qiáng)奸問(wèn)題無(wú)疑有著深刻的性內(nèi)涵。隨著女性意識(shí)的覺(jué)醒以及女權(quán)運(yùn)動(dòng)的不斷推進(jìn),婚內(nèi)強(qiáng)奸犯罪化只是個(gè)時(shí)間問(wèn)題。因此,筆者認(rèn)為,學(xué)術(shù)上我們盡可以保持開(kāi)放的討論;實(shí)踐中我們則應(yīng)該避免混亂,穩(wěn)步推進(jìn)婚內(nèi)強(qiáng)奸犯罪化的進(jìn)程。鑒于此故,本文通過(guò)對(duì)婚內(nèi)強(qiáng)奸的理論和實(shí)踐作出認(rèn)真的分析與檢討,嘗試拓展出一條思考和解決婚內(nèi)強(qiáng)奸問(wèn)題的新途徑。 文章共分為導(dǎo)言、正文五章、結(jié)束語(yǔ),共計(jì)約24,000余字。 論文前言部分對(duì)寫(xiě)作的初衷、婚內(nèi)強(qiáng)奸問(wèn)題的發(fā)展趨勢(shì)以及其深層次的社會(huì)背景作了簡(jiǎn)要說(shuō)明。 第一章首先對(duì)婚內(nèi)強(qiáng)奸的相關(guān)案例進(jìn)行了系統(tǒng)的歸納和分析,提出了我們面對(duì)的司法困境;其次分析了國(guó)內(nèi)外婚內(nèi)強(qiáng)奸的現(xiàn)實(shí)狀況,明確了婚內(nèi)強(qiáng)奸作為一個(gè)客觀現(xiàn)實(shí)的嚴(yán)重性。 第二章對(duì)有關(guān)婚內(nèi)強(qiáng)奸的理論爭(zhēng)議進(jìn)行了系統(tǒng)的論述和分析,主要有否定說(shuō)、肯定說(shuō)和折中說(shuō)。通過(guò)對(duì)這些學(xué)說(shuō)的分析和評(píng)述,筆者肯定婚內(nèi)強(qiáng)奸犯罪化的立場(chǎng)得到了顯現(xiàn)。 第三章對(duì)婚內(nèi)強(qiáng)奸犯罪化的可能性進(jìn)行了理論的和現(xiàn)實(shí)的分析,并歸納了國(guó)外及港、臺(tái)地區(qū)的相關(guān)經(jīng)驗(yàn),以供借鑒。通過(guò)此部分的系統(tǒng)論述,我們看到婚內(nèi)強(qiáng)奸犯罪化具有法權(quán)理論依據(jù)并具有相應(yīng)的國(guó)際、國(guó)內(nèi)法律環(huán)境。 第四章對(duì)我國(guó)存在的關(guān)于婚內(nèi)強(qiáng)奸問(wèn)題的兩個(gè)較嚴(yán)重的錯(cuò)誤傾向進(jìn)行了分析——婚內(nèi)強(qiáng)奸無(wú)性化與調(diào)解制度問(wèn)題。本章首先批判了目前在我國(guó)普遍存在的婚內(nèi)強(qiáng)奸無(wú)性化傾向,明確了婚內(nèi)強(qiáng)奸問(wèn)題應(yīng)具備的性內(nèi)涵。其次通過(guò)分析婚內(nèi)強(qiáng)奸的性質(zhì)和目前我國(guó)調(diào)解制中存在的問(wèn)題,否定了在婚內(nèi)強(qiáng)奸中適用調(diào)解制的合理性。 第五章結(jié)合國(guó)外相關(guān)經(jīng)驗(yàn)及我國(guó)國(guó)情,從實(shí)體法以及程序法的雙重角度,提出了筆者對(duì)婚內(nèi)強(qiáng)奸犯罪化的實(shí)踐構(gòu)想。 結(jié)束語(yǔ)對(duì)婚內(nèi)強(qiáng)奸問(wèn)題進(jìn)行了引伸,并通過(guò)對(duì)一部經(jīng)典著作簡(jiǎn)要而深刻的解讀,將女性主義、男性主義、自然法、工具主義等諸多元素結(jié)合到婚內(nèi)強(qiáng)奸問(wèn)題中來(lái),使問(wèn)題的討論具有了哲學(xué)深度。
[Abstract]:Marital rape has always been a subject of wide controversy in the community. Although academic unity of opinion is gratifying, the disunity of judicial judgments is indeed worrying. The same nature of the case can not be the same judgment, seriously undermine the unity of the rule of law, authority and predictability. We should see that marital rape is the inevitable result of social progress and the further emancipation of human thought. At the 1996 report on Human Rights, the United Nations urged countries around the world to criminalize marital rape, representing the trend of world legislation. Feminism, on the other hand, raised sex to a political issue. McKinnon once said, "Sex is as important to feminism as labor is to Marxism." It can be seen that "sex" is of great importance and needs careful treatment, while marital rape undoubtedly has a profound sexual connotation. With the awakening of female consciousness and the advancement of feminist movement, it is only a matter of time before marital rape is criminalized. Therefore, the author believes that we can keep open discussion academically, and in practice we should avoid confusion and steadily advance the process of marital rape criminalization. In view of this, this paper tries to develop a new way to think and solve the problem of marital rape by making a serious analysis and review on the theory and practice of marital rape. The article is divided into the introduction, the body of five chapters, concluding remarks, a total of about 24000 words. The preface of the paper briefly explains the original intention of writing, the development trend of marital rape and its deep social background. The first chapter systematically summarizes and analyzes the related cases of marital rape, and puts forward the judicial dilemma we face; secondly, it analyzes the actual situation of marital rape at home and abroad. It clarifies the seriousness of marital rape as an objective reality. The second chapter systematically discusses and analyzes the theoretical controversy about marital rape, including negation, affirmation and compromise. Through the analysis and comment of these theories, the author affirms that marital rape is criminalized. The third chapter makes a theoretical and practical analysis of the possibility of marital rape, and sums up the relevant experiences of foreign countries, Hong Kong and Taiwan for reference. Through the systematic discussion in this part, we can see that the crime of marital rape has the theoretical basis of legal power and the corresponding international and domestic legal environment. In the fourth chapter, the author analyzes two serious wrong tendencies about marital rape in China-marital rape asexuality and mediation system. Firstly, this chapter criticizes the asexual tendency of marital rape in China, and clarifies the sexual connotation of marital rape. Secondly, by analyzing the nature of marital rape and the problems existing in the mediation system in our country, the rationality of applying mediation system in marital rape is denied. The fifth chapter combines the relevant experience of foreign countries and the national conditions of our country, from the substantive law and the procedure law dual angle, proposed the author to the marital rape crime practice idea. The conclusion extends the issue of marital rape, and through a brief and profound interpretation of a classic book, it combines many elements, such as feminism, masculinism, natural law, instrumentalism and so on, into the issue of marital rape. Give philosophical depth to the discussion of the problem.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:蘭州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2008
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】:D924.3

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前7條

1 陳興良;;婚內(nèi)強(qiáng)奸犯罪化:能與不能——一種法解釋學(xué)的分析[J];法學(xué);2006年02期

2 冀祥德;耦合權(quán)利義務(wù)說(shuō):婚內(nèi)強(qiáng)奸立論的理論原點(diǎn)[J];婦女研究論叢;2004年01期

3 何懿甫;配偶權(quán)與婚內(nèi)強(qiáng)奸[J];法律適用;2001年04期

4 高洪賓;配偶權(quán)初探[J];法律適用;2000年08期

5 陳興良;法治國(guó)的刑法文化——21世紀(jì)刑法學(xué)研究展望[J];人民檢察;1999年11期

6 馬占超;婚內(nèi)強(qiáng)奸的理論爭(zhēng)鳴和立法探究[J];湘潭工學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2003年04期

7 周華山;“婚內(nèi)強(qiáng)奸法”的本土化研究[J];浙江學(xué)刊;1999年02期



本文編號(hào):2246596

資料下載
論文發(fā)表

本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/hyflw/2246596.html


Copyright(c)文論論文網(wǎng)All Rights Reserved | 網(wǎng)站地圖 |

版權(quán)申明:資料由用戶f9152***提供,本站僅收錄摘要或目錄,作者需要?jiǎng)h除請(qǐng)E-mail郵箱bigeng88@qq.com