論未成年子女的姓名權(quán)
發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-09-13 15:20
【摘要】：婚姻家庭問題是與每個(gè)人切身利益密切相關(guān)的問題,未成年子女的姓名權(quán)作為其中的一角,也不可避免地成為學(xué)界關(guān)注的焦點(diǎn)。未成年子女姓名權(quán)問題不僅涉及到兒童的社會(huì)認(rèn)同,更關(guān)乎家庭和睦和幸福。因?yàn)?姓名是每個(gè)人主體存在的標(biāo)志,是獲得社會(huì)認(rèn)同的標(biāo)志,還承載了復(fù)雜的利益關(guān)系。在子女姓氏問題上,父母雙方可能各持己見,一旦雙方就子女的姓名選擇或變更不能達(dá)成一致意見,很容易誘發(fā)家庭矛盾,影響家庭的和諧穩(wěn)定。我國現(xiàn)行法律對(duì)姓名權(quán)的規(guī)定,主要表現(xiàn)在《婚姻法》和《民法通則》。此項(xiàng)原則性是一般規(guī)定,人們對(duì)此的認(rèn)為往往難以達(dá)成統(tǒng)一觀點(diǎn)。在兒童姓氏及名字的選擇和更改上,許多人認(rèn)為,法律并未做出禁止性規(guī)定,“法無禁止即可行”,他人無權(quán)干涉子女的姓名權(quán),現(xiàn)實(shí)生活中爭(zhēng)議不斷。最新立法解釋的出臺(tái),使得子女可選擇“第三人姓氏”合法化,但又引發(fā)公眾對(duì)“正當(dāng)理由”的猜疑;目前,相關(guān)法律規(guī)定對(duì)姓名的選擇上缺乏規(guī)范,法律法規(guī)難以有效整合;離婚率增加,離異家庭父母一方擅自給兒童改姓的糾紛時(shí)有發(fā)生。本文除序論和結(jié)語,主要從四個(gè)方面論證兒童姓名權(quán)問題。首先,文章從民法姓名權(quán)的屬性及內(nèi)涵出發(fā),論述兒童姓名權(quán)法理基礎(chǔ),具體從姓名決定、使用和變更行使談起,這是兒童獨(dú)立人格權(quán),父母對(duì)兒童該權(quán)利的代為行使,表現(xiàn)了父母監(jiān)護(hù)的一角;其次,參考域外法對(duì)兒童姓名權(quán)的相關(guān)規(guī)定;第三部分結(jié)合以往司法判例,討論關(guān)于孩子姓名權(quán)的點(diǎn)點(diǎn)爭(zhēng)議,比如細(xì)化“第三人姓氏”的問題、離異家庭未成年子女改姓的問題、兒童改名的規(guī)范性問題;最后,針對(duì)司法實(shí)踐中的若干案例,提出完善未成年子女姓名權(quán)的建議,如將最新立法解釋關(guān)于“其他正當(dāng)理由”的兜底條款具體化,增強(qiáng)實(shí)踐可操作性,使得“第三姓”的選擇更加明確化;正視子女作為自身獨(dú)立權(quán)利個(gè)體的地位,更多關(guān)注子女的利益最大化實(shí)現(xiàn);重視取名的規(guī)范性等。
[Abstract]:The problem of marriage and family is closely related to the vital interests of everyone, and the right to name of minor children, as one of them, inevitably becomes the focus of academic attention. The right to name of minor children is not only related to children's social identity, but also to family harmony and happiness. Because the name is the symbol of the existence of everyone, the symbol of social identity, and the bearing of complex interests. On the issue of children's family name, parents may hold their own opinions. Once the two sides can not agree on the choice or change of the children's name, it is easy to induce family conflicts and affect the harmony and stability of the family. The current law of our country provides for the right of name mainly in Marriage Law and General principles of Civil Law. This principle is a general rule, to which it is often difficult to reach a unified view. In the choice and change of children's surname and first name, many people think that the law does not make the prohibition, "the law can do without prohibition", others have no right to interfere with the child's right to a name, and there are many disputes in real life. The introduction of the latest legislative interpretation has made it possible for children to choose a "third person's surname", but it has also aroused public suspicion of "just reasons"; at present, the relevant laws and regulations lack of norms on the choice of names, and it is difficult to effectively integrate laws and regulations; Divorce rates have increased, and disputes over unauthorized surnames of children by one parent of a divorced family have occurred from time to time. In this paper, the preface and conclusion, mainly from four aspects of children's right to name. First of all, starting from the attribute and connotation of the right of name in civil law, this paper discusses the legal basis of the right of name of children, and discusses the legal basis of the right of name, which is the independent personality right of children and the representative exercise of the right of parents to children. Showing a corner of parental custody; secondly, referring to the relevant provisions of extraterritorial laws on children's right to a name; part three, combining with past judicial precedents, to discuss points and disputes about the right of a child to a name, such as refining the issue of "third person's surname," The problem of changing the surname of minor children from divorced families and the normative problem of children's renaming. Finally, in view of some cases in judicial practice, the author puts forward some suggestions on how to perfect the right to name of minor children. Such as the embodiment of the latest legislative interpretation of the "other legitimate reasons" clause, the enhancement of practical maneuverability, the clearer choice of the "third surname", and the recognition of the status of the child as an individual with independent rights of his or her own. Pay more attention to the maximization of children's interests; pay attention to the standardization of naming and so on.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：中國社會(huì)科學(xué)院研究生院
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號(hào)】：D923
本文編號(hào)：2241559
[Abstract]:The problem of marriage and family is closely related to the vital interests of everyone, and the right to name of minor children, as one of them, inevitably becomes the focus of academic attention. The right to name of minor children is not only related to children's social identity, but also to family harmony and happiness. Because the name is the symbol of the existence of everyone, the symbol of social identity, and the bearing of complex interests. On the issue of children's family name, parents may hold their own opinions. Once the two sides can not agree on the choice or change of the children's name, it is easy to induce family conflicts and affect the harmony and stability of the family. The current law of our country provides for the right of name mainly in Marriage Law and General principles of Civil Law. This principle is a general rule, to which it is often difficult to reach a unified view. In the choice and change of children's surname and first name, many people think that the law does not make the prohibition, "the law can do without prohibition", others have no right to interfere with the child's right to a name, and there are many disputes in real life. The introduction of the latest legislative interpretation has made it possible for children to choose a "third person's surname", but it has also aroused public suspicion of "just reasons"; at present, the relevant laws and regulations lack of norms on the choice of names, and it is difficult to effectively integrate laws and regulations; Divorce rates have increased, and disputes over unauthorized surnames of children by one parent of a divorced family have occurred from time to time. In this paper, the preface and conclusion, mainly from four aspects of children's right to name. First of all, starting from the attribute and connotation of the right of name in civil law, this paper discusses the legal basis of the right of name of children, and discusses the legal basis of the right of name, which is the independent personality right of children and the representative exercise of the right of parents to children. Showing a corner of parental custody; secondly, referring to the relevant provisions of extraterritorial laws on children's right to a name; part three, combining with past judicial precedents, to discuss points and disputes about the right of a child to a name, such as refining the issue of "third person's surname," The problem of changing the surname of minor children from divorced families and the normative problem of children's renaming. Finally, in view of some cases in judicial practice, the author puts forward some suggestions on how to perfect the right to name of minor children. Such as the embodiment of the latest legislative interpretation of the "other legitimate reasons" clause, the enhancement of practical maneuverability, the clearer choice of the "third surname", and the recognition of the status of the child as an individual with independent rights of his or her own. Pay more attention to the maximization of children's interests; pay attention to the standardization of naming and so on.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：中國社會(huì)科學(xué)院研究生院
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號(hào)】：D923
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 陳伙平;《兒童權(quán)利公約》及其在我國的實(shí)施[J];福州師專學(xué)報(bào);2001年06期
2 殷倩;;關(guān)于規(guī)范姓名變更權(quán)的法律思考[J];法制與社會(huì);2008年29期
3 袁仕益;;姓名權(quán)法律保護(hù)之研究[J];法制與社會(huì);2009年09期
4 張博;;關(guān)于公安機(jī)關(guān)受理公民姓名變更申請(qǐng)的若干思考[J];法制與社會(huì);2011年25期
5 陳丹妮;;對(duì)“趙C案”的法理思考[J];廣西政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2009年05期
6 王劍華;;公安部就趙C案作出批復(fù):姓名登記應(yīng)使用規(guī)范漢字[J];法制與經(jīng)濟(jì)(中旬刊);2009年02期
7 杜秋,陳紹鋒;未成年子女姓名權(quán)的法律思考[J];南京人口管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2004年02期
8 張紅;;姓名變更規(guī)范研究[J];法學(xué)研究;2013年03期
9 夏吟蘭;何俊萍;;現(xiàn)代大陸法系親屬法之發(fā)展變革[J];法學(xué)論壇;2011年02期
10 于維君;;婦女運(yùn)動(dòng)與臺(tái)灣地區(qū)民法親屬編的現(xiàn)代轉(zhuǎn)型[J];政法學(xué)刊;2009年06期
相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前3條
1 朱炳輝;[N];工人日?qǐng)?bào);2009年
2 劉開潔;[N];語言文字周報(bào);2009年
3 唐堯;[N];語言文字周報(bào);2010年
，本文編號(hào)：2241559
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/hyflw/2241559.html
教材專著
