【摘要】： 家事訴訟程序作為解決家事糾紛的程序,屬于特殊的民事訴訟程序。本文采用比較的方法、歷史的方法和實(shí)證的方法,在分別分析了家事訴訟程序的基本問(wèn)題、我國(guó)關(guān)于家事訴訟程序的基本立法現(xiàn)狀、構(gòu)建的必要性和可行性基礎(chǔ)上,著重對(duì)如何構(gòu)建我國(guó)的家事訴訟程序進(jìn)行了初步的探索,并針對(duì)構(gòu)建中的具體問(wèn)題進(jìn)行了深入分析,以期為構(gòu)建我國(guó)專門(mén)的家事訴訟程序獻(xiàn)一份力。 本文正文共分為四部分,主要內(nèi)容是: 第一章:家事訴訟程序概述�；谖覈�(guó)沒(méi)有關(guān)于家事訴訟程序?qū)ｉT(mén)的立法規(guī)定,家事訴訟程序僅僅是一個(gè)學(xué)理的概念,而國(guó)外雖然有相關(guān)立法,但對(duì)家事訴訟程序名稱、適用范圍等都不一樣。故,本章首先從分析國(guó)外關(guān)于家事訴訟程序的調(diào)整對(duì)象入手,進(jìn)而歸納了本文論述的“家事訴訟程序”的調(diào)整對(duì)象及其外延。其次,在分析我國(guó)學(xué)理上關(guān)于家事訴訟程序概念的基礎(chǔ)上,總結(jié)了本文所論述的家事訴訟程序內(nèi)涵。最后,指出家事訴訟程序在我國(guó)民事訴訟程序中應(yīng)有的地位及性質(zhì)。 第二章:我國(guó)家事訴訟程序之立法。雖然我國(guó)沒(méi)有專門(mén)的家事訴訟程序,但是相關(guān)立法中也有關(guān)于家事訴訟程序的特殊規(guī)定。本章首先介紹了我國(guó)《民事訴訟法》、《婚姻法》及相關(guān)司法解釋中對(duì)家事訴訟程序的專門(mén)規(guī)定。其次分析了立法現(xiàn)狀中存在的問(wèn)題,比如,條文少、規(guī)定散、不系統(tǒng)、缺乏操作性,難以實(shí)現(xiàn)家事訴訟程序的價(jià)值等。最后分析造成這種現(xiàn)狀的原因,主要從法律文化的影響、職權(quán)主義訴訟模式的影響、理論研究不足等三個(gè)方面來(lái)分析。 第三章:構(gòu)建我國(guó)家事訴訟程序之必要。首先,分析我國(guó)目前有必要建立家事訴訟程序,主要是因?yàn)榧沂录m紛的特殊性、家事訴訟程序的專門(mén)訴訟價(jià)值及民訴司法改革實(shí)踐的需要;其次,構(gòu)建家事訴訟程序具有可行性。主要表現(xiàn)在具有合理的法理基礎(chǔ),有相關(guān)的立法、司法實(shí)踐經(jīng)驗(yàn)及國(guó)外成熟的立法經(jīng)驗(yàn)。 第四章:關(guān)于我國(guó)家事訴訟程序的構(gòu)建。首先,在構(gòu)建專門(mén)家事訴訟程序之前,必須要考慮家事訴訟程序的性質(zhì)、構(gòu)建目的及立法例。其次,家事訴訟程序的基本原則。主要包括職權(quán)主義原則及非公開(kāi)審判原則。對(duì)于職權(quán)主義,在介紹了概念及立法有關(guān)規(guī)定的基礎(chǔ)上,認(rèn)為職權(quán)主義只有在立法明確規(guī)定的情況下才能行使,且需要通過(guò)命令的方式要求當(dāng)事人或者檢察機(jī)關(guān)來(lái)行使;在法律沒(méi)有明確規(guī)定的情況下,法官不能直接行使職權(quán),而應(yīng)該通過(guò)釋明權(quán)等間接行使;對(duì)于非公開(kāi)審判原則,在強(qiáng)調(diào)適用范圍應(yīng)該擴(kuò)大的同時(shí),認(rèn)為應(yīng)該將非公開(kāi)審判原則的范圍不僅僅局限于審判程序,還應(yīng)該包括與案件有關(guān)的文書(shū)資料。再次,介紹了家事訴訟程序的基本制度規(guī)定。主要從四個(gè)方面,分三個(gè)層次來(lái)介紹。在介紹國(guó)內(nèi)外立法的基礎(chǔ)上,分別分析了調(diào)解制度、當(dāng)事人制度、檢察機(jī)關(guān)參與制度及集中化審理制度,并分別提出相關(guān)制度在具體家事糾紛類(lèi)型中的體現(xiàn),從而形成了對(duì)構(gòu)建我國(guó)家事訴訟程序基本輪廓的論證和分析。
[Abstract]:As a procedure for solving family disputes, family lawsuit procedure belongs to special civil procedure. This paper adopts comparative method, historical method and empirical method to analyze the basic problems of family lawsuit procedure, the basic legislative status quo of family lawsuit procedure in China, the necessity and feasibility of its construction. This paper makes a preliminary exploration on how to construct our country's family lawsuit procedure, and makes a thorough analysis on the concrete problems in the construction, so as to contribute to the construction of our country's special family lawsuit procedure.
The text is divided into four parts, the main contents are:
Chapter One: Summary of Family Procedure. Since there is no special legislation on family procedure in China, family procedure is only a theoretical concept, while foreign countries have relevant legislation, but the name and scope of application of family procedure are different. Secondly, on the basis of analyzing the concept of family litigation procedure in our country's theory, the connotation of family litigation procedure discussed in this paper is summarized. Finally, the proper place of family litigation procedure in our country's civil procedure is pointed out. Position and nature.
Chapter 2: Legislation of family lawsuit procedure in China. Although there is no special family lawsuit procedure in China, there are some special provisions about family lawsuit procedure in relevant legislation. This chapter first introduces the special provisions of family lawsuit procedure in Civil Procedure Law, Marriage Law and relevant judicial interpretations. For example, there are few provisions, scattered provisions, unsystematic, lack of operability, difficult to realize the value of family proceedings and so on.
Chapter Three: The necessity of constructing the family lawsuit procedure in our country. Firstly, it is necessary to establish the family lawsuit procedure in our country at present, mainly because of the particularity of family disputes, the special lawsuit value of family lawsuit procedure and the need of civil lawsuit judicial reform practice. Secondly, it is feasible to construct the family lawsuit procedure. The legal basis is related to legislation, experience in judicial practice and mature legislative experience abroad.
Chapter Four: On the construction of family lawsuit procedure in our country. Firstly, we must consider the nature of family lawsuit procedure, the purpose of constructing family lawsuit procedure and the legislative example before constructing family lawsuit procedure. On the basis of the relevant provisions of the legislation, the author holds that the doctrine of authority can only be exercised under the circumstances clearly stipulated in the legislation and requires the parties or procuratorial organs to execute it by order; in the absence of clear provisions in the law, judges can not directly exercise their powers, but should be executed indirectly through the power of interpretation; and in the absence of clear provisions in the law, judges can not execute their powers While emphasizing that the scope of application of the principle of public trial should be expanded, the author holds that the scope of the principle of private trial should not only be limited to the trial procedure, but also include documents and materials related to the case. On the basis of internal and external legislation, this paper analyzes the mediation system, the party system, the procuratorial organ participation system and the centralized trial system respectively, and puts forward the embodiment of relevant systems in the specific types of family disputes, thus forming an argument and Analysis on the construction of the basic outline of China's family proceedings.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：中國(guó)政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2010
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D925.1

【引證文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 涂榮;我國(guó)家事訴訟制度之構(gòu)建[D];海南大學(xué);2012年

，

本文編號(hào)：2231627