【摘要】：在司法實(shí)踐中,債權(quán)人為了保證實(shí)現(xiàn)自己的債權(quán),經(jīng)常會(huì)依據(jù)婚姻法及其司法解釋的相關(guān)規(guī)定,以夫妻共同債務(wù)的名義要求未參與舉債的保證人配偶與保證人一并承擔(dān)責(zé)任。由于合同相對(duì)性被突破后,審判人員對(duì)債權(quán)人的利益應(yīng)當(dāng)保護(hù)到哪種程度把握不定,這種不確定性造成我國(guó)目前各地各級(jí)人民法院對(duì)該問(wèn)題的裁判結(jié)果并不統(tǒng)一。保證合同由于其單務(wù)性、無(wú)償性等特性區(qū)別于一般的合同,因此擔(dān)保之債能否作為夫妻共同債務(wù),還應(yīng)考慮保證人夫妻是否就保證達(dá)成一致意見(jiàn)或是否共同受益的因素。在審判過(guò)程中,對(duì)于上述兩個(gè)因素關(guān)于分配債權(quán)人和保證人配偶的舉證責(zé)任非常重要。因此,平衡保護(hù)債權(quán)人和保證人配偶的合法權(quán)益,合理分配舉證責(zé)任使雙方權(quán)利義務(wù)相對(duì)等是對(duì)該類(lèi)型案件裁判的原則。
[Abstract]:In judicial practice, in order to ensure the realization of their creditor's rights, creditors often require the spouse and guarantor who have not participated in the debt to bear the responsibility in the name of the joint debt of husband and wife according to the relevant provisions of the marriage law and its judicial interpretation. Because of the breach of the relativity of contract, it is uncertain to which extent the judge should protect the interests of creditors. This uncertainty results in the inconsistent adjudication results of people's courts at all levels in our country at present. The guarantee contract is different from the general contract because of its singularity and gratuitous nature, so whether the bond can be regarded as the joint debt of husband and wife, should also consider whether the surety and the surety agree on the guarantee or whether they benefit jointly. In the course of the trial, the burden of proof regarding the distribution of creditors and sponsor spouses is important for the above two factors. Therefore, to balance the protection of the legitimate rights and interests of the creditor and the spouse of the guarantor, and to reasonably distribute the burden of proof so that the rights and obligations of both parties are equal is the principle of adjudication of this type of case.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：暨南大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D923

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前2條

1 郁光華;論物的擔(dān)保之債的經(jīng)濟(jì)意義[J];比較法研究;1997年01期

2 ;[J];;年期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前1條

1 浙江省湖州市吳興區(qū)人民法院 潘文杰邋馮群安;保證人的配偶應(yīng)否對(duì)擔(dān)保之債承擔(dān)責(zé)任[N];人民法院報(bào);2007年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 唐群;保證合同糾紛中保證人配偶對(duì)擔(dān)保之債的責(zé)任分析及裁判對(duì)策[D];暨南大學(xué);2015年

，

本文編號(hào)：2204508