【摘要】：在司法實踐中,債權人為了保證實現(xiàn)自己的債權,經常會依據(jù)婚姻法及其司法解釋的相關規(guī)定,以夫妻共同債務的名義要求未參與舉債的保證人配偶與保證人一并承擔責任。由于合同相對性被突破后,審判人員對債權人的利益應當保護到哪種程度把握不定,這種不確定性造成我國目前各地各級人民法院對該問題的裁判結果并不統(tǒng)一。保證合同由于其單務性、無償性等特性區(qū)別于一般的合同,因此擔保之債能否作為夫妻共同債務,還應考慮保證人夫妻是否就保證達成一致意見或是否共同受益的因素。在審判過程中,對于上述兩個因素關于分配債權人和保證人配偶的舉證責任非常重要。因此,平衡保護債權人和保證人配偶的合法權益,合理分配舉證責任使雙方權利義務相對等是對該類型案件裁判的原則。
[Abstract]:In judicial practice, in order to ensure the realization of their creditor's rights, creditors often require the spouse and guarantor who have not participated in the debt to bear the responsibility in the name of the joint debt of husband and wife according to the relevant provisions of the marriage law and its judicial interpretation. Because of the breach of the relativity of contract, it is uncertain to which extent the judge should protect the interests of creditors. This uncertainty results in the inconsistent adjudication results of people's courts at all levels in our country at present. The guarantee contract is different from the general contract because of its singularity and gratuitous nature, so whether the bond can be regarded as the joint debt of husband and wife, should also consider whether the surety and the surety agree on the guarantee or whether they benefit jointly. In the course of the trial, the burden of proof regarding the distribution of creditors and sponsor spouses is important for the above two factors. Therefore, to balance the protection of the legitimate rights and interests of the creditor and the spouse of the guarantor, and to reasonably distribute the burden of proof so that the rights and obligations of both parties are equal is the principle of adjudication of this type of case.
【學位授予單位】：暨南大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2015
【分類號】：D923

【相似文獻】

相關期刊論文 前2條

1 郁光華;論物的擔保之債的經濟意義[J];比較法研究;1997年01期

2 ;[J];;年期

相關重要報紙文章 前1條

1 浙江省湖州市吳興區(qū)人民法院 潘文杰邋馮群安;保證人的配偶應否對擔保之債承擔責任[N];人民法院報;2007年

相關碩士學位論文 前1條

1 唐群;保證合同糾紛中保證人配偶對擔保之債的責任分析及裁判對策[D];暨南大學;2015年

，

本文編號：2204508