瑕疵登記婚姻糾紛民事救濟途徑研究
發(fā)布時間：2018-08-12 12:21
【摘要】：我國在結(jié)婚程序上實行的是登記制,《婚姻法》及《婚姻登記條例》規(guī)定,當事人申請結(jié)婚的需雙方共同到婚姻登記機關(guān)辦理登記手續(xù)方可成立有效。我國《婚姻法》有無效婚姻和可撤銷婚姻的規(guī)定,但其主要針對的是實體上不符合結(jié)婚要求的婚姻,而對登記程序上存在瑕疵的婚姻糾紛的處理,雖然《婚姻法》司法解釋(三)指出了當事人可以通過申請行政復(fù)議或提起行政訴訟解決,但實踐過程中發(fā)現(xiàn)通過行政途徑解決瑕疵登記婚姻存在很大的局限性,包括訴訟時效限制、子女財產(chǎn)問題無法解決、訴訟效率不高、浪費司法資源等問題。加之,很多瑕疵的出現(xiàn)并非單純是登記機關(guān)的過錯,有些完全是由于當事人的原因造成的,婚姻登記機關(guān)沒有過錯卻承擔敗訴結(jié)果,這實際是一種違法行為與違法責任的不對等。因此,根據(jù)婚姻登記的民事性質(zhì)特點,結(jié)合其他國家的先例及部分法官的實踐可知,民事訴訟途徑在解決瑕疵登記婚姻糾紛中相比行政途徑確有一定優(yōu)勢,特別是運用民事訴訟中的婚姻成立與否確認之訴來解決瑕疵登記婚姻糾紛,不但在法理上能得到相關(guān)理論支持,而且也能克服行政途徑中存在的弊端與難題,具有較高的可行性。本文運用案例分析和比較研究法,通過筆者所任職單位兩個性質(zhì)相同案例處理方式卻不同的對比,引出瑕疵登記婚姻案件處理中存在的問題,進而分析行政救濟途徑解決瑕疵登記婚姻案件的局限性,提出將瑕疵登記婚姻案件應(yīng)交由民事訴訟處理的觀點。全文分成四部分:第一部分是通過介紹筆者任職單位處理的兩個瑕疵登記婚姻糾紛案例,由案例的不同處理模式引申出案例處理中所爭議的問題及涉及的觀點分歧。第二部分主要闡述說明瑕疵登記婚姻的概念、特征和主要類型。第三部分是通過分析對比行政救濟途徑的局限性,提出民事訴訟途徑解決瑕疵登記婚姻的法理依據(jù)及優(yōu)勢。第四部分是分析通過民事訴訟確認之訴,也即運用婚姻成立與否確認之訴解決瑕疵登記婚姻糾紛的價值意義及可行性,并就具體的案例如何適用婚姻成立與否確認之訴進行實務(wù)分析。
[Abstract]:In our country, the registration system is practiced in the marriage procedure. According to the Marriage Law and the Marriage Registration regulations, the parties who apply for marriage must go to the marriage registration authority to go through the registration procedures. The Marriage Law of our country has the stipulation of invalid marriage and revocable marriage, but it mainly aims at the marriage which does not meet the requirement of marriage in the entity, and deals with the marriage dispute which is defective in the registration procedure. Although the judicial interpretation of the Marriage Law (3) points out that the parties concerned can be resolved by applying for administrative reconsideration or filing administrative proceedings, it is found in practice that there are great limitations in resolving defective registered marriages through administrative means. It includes limitation of action, problem of children's property, inefficiency of litigation, waste of judicial resources and so on. In addition, the appearance of many defects is not simply the fault of the registration authority. Some of them are caused entirely by the reasons of the parties concerned. The marriage registration authorities bear the result of losing the case without any fault. This is actually a violation of the law and the illegality of the responsibility of the unequal. Therefore, according to the civil nature of marriage registration, combined with the precedents of other countries and the practice of some judges, the civil litigation approach has some advantages over the administrative approach in resolving marital disputes of defective registration. In particular, the application of civil litigation in civil litigation to the settlement of marriage disputes of defective registration can not only be supported by relevant theories, but also overcome the drawbacks and difficulties existing in the administrative channels. It has high feasibility. This article uses the case analysis and the comparative research method, through the author's office unit two same nature case processing way but different contrast, elicits the flaw registration marriage case processing existence question, Then it analyzes the limitation of administrative remedy to solve the defect registration marriage cases, and puts forward the point of view that the defective registration marriage cases should be dealt with in civil proceedings. The full text is divided into four parts: the first part is through the introduction of the author's office to deal with two cases of marriage disputes of defective registration, from the different treatment mode of cases to deduce the controversial issues and the views involved in the treatment of different cases. The second part mainly explains the concept, characteristics and main types of defective registered marriage. The third part analyzes the limitation of administrative remedy and puts forward the legal basis and advantages of civil litigation to solve the problem of registered marriage. The fourth part is to analyze the value significance and feasibility of using civil action to confirm civil litigation, that is to say, to solve the marriage dispute of defective registration by using the action of marriage establishment or not. And how to apply the specific case of the establishment of marriage or not to confirm the action for practical analysis.
【學位授予單位】：湘潭大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2016
【分類號】：D923.9
本文編號：2179039
[Abstract]:In our country, the registration system is practiced in the marriage procedure. According to the Marriage Law and the Marriage Registration regulations, the parties who apply for marriage must go to the marriage registration authority to go through the registration procedures. The Marriage Law of our country has the stipulation of invalid marriage and revocable marriage, but it mainly aims at the marriage which does not meet the requirement of marriage in the entity, and deals with the marriage dispute which is defective in the registration procedure. Although the judicial interpretation of the Marriage Law (3) points out that the parties concerned can be resolved by applying for administrative reconsideration or filing administrative proceedings, it is found in practice that there are great limitations in resolving defective registered marriages through administrative means. It includes limitation of action, problem of children's property, inefficiency of litigation, waste of judicial resources and so on. In addition, the appearance of many defects is not simply the fault of the registration authority. Some of them are caused entirely by the reasons of the parties concerned. The marriage registration authorities bear the result of losing the case without any fault. This is actually a violation of the law and the illegality of the responsibility of the unequal. Therefore, according to the civil nature of marriage registration, combined with the precedents of other countries and the practice of some judges, the civil litigation approach has some advantages over the administrative approach in resolving marital disputes of defective registration. In particular, the application of civil litigation in civil litigation to the settlement of marriage disputes of defective registration can not only be supported by relevant theories, but also overcome the drawbacks and difficulties existing in the administrative channels. It has high feasibility. This article uses the case analysis and the comparative research method, through the author's office unit two same nature case processing way but different contrast, elicits the flaw registration marriage case processing existence question, Then it analyzes the limitation of administrative remedy to solve the defect registration marriage cases, and puts forward the point of view that the defective registration marriage cases should be dealt with in civil proceedings. The full text is divided into four parts: the first part is through the introduction of the author's office to deal with two cases of marriage disputes of defective registration, from the different treatment mode of cases to deduce the controversial issues and the views involved in the treatment of different cases. The second part mainly explains the concept, characteristics and main types of defective registered marriage. The third part analyzes the limitation of administrative remedy and puts forward the legal basis and advantages of civil litigation to solve the problem of registered marriage. The fourth part is to analyze the value significance and feasibility of using civil action to confirm civil litigation, that is to say, to solve the marriage dispute of defective registration by using the action of marriage establishment or not. And how to apply the specific case of the establishment of marriage or not to confirm the action for practical analysis.
【學位授予單位】：湘潭大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2016
【分類號】：D923.9
【參考文獻】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前6條
1 楊強;;婚姻登記瑕疵的法律思考[J];法制博覽;2015年09期
2 孫若軍;;瑕疵結(jié)婚登記處理方式的體系化思考[J];中華女子學院學報;2014年06期
3 胡良武;;妻子結(jié)婚登記用假證 丈夫離婚再婚成難題[J];中國民政;2012年06期
4 林晶;;探研婚姻登記瑕疵的處理[J];品牌(理論月刊);2011年03期
5 王禮仁;;應(yīng)當適用婚姻成立與不成立之訴解決婚姻登記暇疵糾紛[J];人民司法;2009年13期
6 孫若君;論欺騙登記婚的法律后果[J];法律適用;2004年10期
相關(guān)重要報紙文章 前1條
1 王禮仁 ;羅紅軍 ;黃金波;;借用他人身份證登記結(jié)婚的訴訟路徑及效力判斷[N];人民法院報;2010年
相關(guān)碩士學位論文 前3條
1 張磊;論婚姻登記瑕疵的處理[D];華東政法大學;2014年
2 申蒂;婚姻登記程序瑕疵的效力與救濟問題研究[D];廣西大學;2013年
3 杜洪碩;結(jié)婚登記瑕疵及其立法完善[D];吉林大學;2011年
，本文編號：2179039
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/hyflw/2179039.html
