本文選題：虛假身份 + 無效婚姻�。� 參考：《天津師范大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：以虛假身份登記結(jié)婚是婚姻登記程序瑕疵的一種典型情況,而在我國目前的立法和司法實(shí)踐中對(duì)這一類問題的認(rèn)定和處理都存在著較多的問題。對(duì)于以虛假身份登記結(jié)婚而形成的婚姻關(guān)系,法律上怎么定性,當(dāng)事人又改以何種方式來使自己的權(quán)利得到很好的救濟(jì)?"假結(jié)婚"而形成的婚姻關(guān)系能否成立,如果是成立的,那是可撤銷的婚姻關(guān)系還是有效的婚姻關(guān)系?如果是可撤銷的婚姻關(guān)系,那么應(yīng)該通過提起民事訴訟的途徑解決還是提起行政訴訟?對(duì)于這些問題,我國的婚姻立法上都沒有一個(gè)明確而又統(tǒng)一的規(guī)定,導(dǎo)致當(dāng)事人的合法權(quán)益往往得到不很好的救濟(jì)。所以對(duì)以虛假身份登記結(jié)婚的案件該如何定性,以及如何使受害方得到更適當(dāng),更全面的救濟(jì)是迫切要解決的問題。本文主要通過三個(gè)部分來對(duì)上面提出的問題加以闡述。首先,以一個(gè)以虛假身份登記結(jié)婚的典型案例為切入點(diǎn),通過對(duì)相關(guān)典型案例的分析概括出以虛假身份登記結(jié)婚的類型與特征。其次,在明確了"假結(jié)婚"的各種種類之后,進(jìn)而通過結(jié)合行政訴訟法與民事訴訟法的相關(guān)知識(shí),運(yùn)用訴的分類理論以及民事法律行為成立與生效的區(qū)分理論,提出了婚姻構(gòu)成要件理論一說。從而為我國的婚姻構(gòu)成要件理論研究提出一些自己的意見和建議。最后,在明確了以虛假身份登記結(jié)婚的案件屬于婚姻不成立以后,通過提出確立婚姻不成立之訴以使得在因"假結(jié)婚"而引起的訴訟糾紛中,雙方當(dāng)事人的權(quán)利得到更好的救濟(jì)并對(duì)我國的婚姻立法以及審判實(shí)踐提出自己的一些修改建議。
[Abstract]:The registration of marriage with false identity is a typical case of the defect in the procedure of marriage registration, and there are many problems in the identification and treatment of this kind of problem in the current legislative and judicial practice in our country. Can it be a good remedy for your rights? If it is established, is it a revocable marriage or an effective marriage? If it is a revocable marriage relationship, it should be settled through the path of civil litigation or the administrative litigation? For these questions, I There is no clear and unified provision in the marriage legislation of the country, which leads to the legitimate rights and interests of the parties. Therefore, it is an urgent problem to solve the problem of how to identify the cases of marriage with false identity, and how to make the injured party more appropriate and more comprehensive. This article mainly passes through three departments. First, a typical case that is registered with a false identity is taken as the breakthrough point, and the types and characteristics of the marriage are summarized by the analysis of the typical cases. Secondly, after the various kinds of "false marriage" are clearly defined, the combination of administrative litigation law and civil law is made. The relevant knowledge of the litigation law, the classification theory of the lawsuit and the theory of the distinction between the establishment and the effective of the civil law, put forward the theory of the constitution of marriage, and put forward some own opinions and suggestions for the study of the theory of the constitution of marriage in our country. After the establishment, the rights of both parties were better remedied in the litigation disputes caused by "false marriage", and some amendments to the marriage legislation and trial practice of our country were put forward.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：天津師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：D923.9

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 冉克平;;論婚姻締結(jié)中的意思表示瑕疵及其效力[J];武漢大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2016年05期

2 張洪波;;論不溯既往原則在新《婚姻法》及其司法解釋中的適用[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);2015年05期

3 賀劍;;論婚姻法回歸民法的基本思路 以法定夫妻財(cái)產(chǎn)制為重點(diǎn)[J];中外法學(xué);2014年06期

4 夏吟蘭;;民法典體系下婚姻家庭法之基本架構(gòu)與邏輯體例[J];政法論壇;2014年05期

5 徐國棟;;無效與可撤銷婚姻中誠信當(dāng)事人的保護(hù)[J];中國法學(xué);2013年05期

6 李洪祥;王春瑩;;婚姻法律存在的問題及對(duì)策研究——以親屬法體系的完善為視角[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);2012年02期

7 楊立新;;最高人民法院《關(guān)于適用〈婚姻法〉若干問題的解釋(三)》的民法基礎(chǔ)[J];法律適用;2011年10期

8 劉淑華;;我國澳門地區(qū)事實(shí)婚姻法律制度研究[J];法學(xué)雜志;2011年07期

9 樊非;劉興旺;劉佳佳;;婚姻登記行政訴訟司法審查研究──以婚姻法與行政法競(jìng)合為視角[J];法律適用;2011年04期

10 靳建麗;;宣告婚姻無效案件應(yīng)適用何種訴訟程序[J];法律適用;2011年03期

，

本文編號(hào)：1939146