本文選題：婚內(nèi)財(cái)產(chǎn)分割協(xié)議 + 物權(quán)變動(dòng)效力��； 參考：《南京大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：婚內(nèi)財(cái)產(chǎn)分割協(xié)議——我國司法實(shí)務(wù)中內(nèi)生的非法律概念,是司法實(shí)踐中法官對于我國現(xiàn)存夫妻財(cái)產(chǎn)制制度規(guī)定不能滿足婚姻當(dāng)事人現(xiàn)實(shí)需求而積極彌補(bǔ)的產(chǎn)物,其在一定程度上緩解了我國分居制度法律空白所帶來的實(shí)務(wù)困境。"衍生物"意味著婚內(nèi)財(cái)產(chǎn)分割協(xié)議面臨法學(xué)理論缺乏,法律地位不明確及司法審判認(rèn)定效力不一的復(fù)雜局面。2014年第12期公報(bào)案例"唐某訴李某某、唐某乙法定繼承糾紛案"再次將這一現(xiàn)實(shí)問題推向理論界,使得婚內(nèi)財(cái)產(chǎn)分割協(xié)議的理論研究成為熱點(diǎn)。第一部分:文章在大量案例整理收集及廣泛閱讀相關(guān)文獻(xiàn)的基礎(chǔ)上,結(jié)合司法實(shí)踐中的運(yùn)用現(xiàn)狀,分析案例,首先闡釋婚內(nèi)財(cái)產(chǎn)分割協(xié)議的構(gòu)成要件,進(jìn)而確定婚內(nèi)財(cái)產(chǎn)分割協(xié)議的法律性質(zhì)。對婚內(nèi)財(cái)產(chǎn)分割協(xié)議的定義、構(gòu)成要件進(jìn)行真實(shí)定義,嚴(yán)格限定概念。概念乃是解決法律問題所必需的和必不可少的工具,通過對我國婚內(nèi)財(cái)產(chǎn)分割協(xié)議司法實(shí)踐中的內(nèi)涵進(jìn)行全面歸納總結(jié),明晰其符合我國夫妻約定財(cái)產(chǎn)制的理論構(gòu)架,是我國夫妻約定財(cái)產(chǎn)制的表現(xiàn)形式,為后文的深入研究奠定基礎(chǔ)。最后,對實(shí)務(wù)中易于與婚內(nèi)財(cái)產(chǎn)分割協(xié)議混淆的婚內(nèi)析產(chǎn)、夫妻間贈(zèng)與之間的關(guān)系辨析。第二部分:婚內(nèi)財(cái)產(chǎn)分割協(xié)議的效力主要包括:物權(quán)變動(dòng)效力、物權(quán)對抗效力。夫妻一體性使得婚內(nèi)財(cái)產(chǎn)分割協(xié)議引起的物權(quán)變動(dòng)效力及物權(quán)對抗效力在對內(nèi)與對外關(guān)系上具有特殊性。法律對物權(quán)變動(dòng)于夫妻當(dāng)事人(內(nèi)部)的物權(quán)變動(dòng)效力及與第三人(外部)的物權(quán)對抗效力保障力不同,必須在理論與實(shí)踐中區(qū)分。在婚內(nèi)財(cái)產(chǎn)分割協(xié)議導(dǎo)致物權(quán)發(fā)生變動(dòng)時(shí),物權(quán)變動(dòng)效力作用于夫妻當(dāng)事人約定的財(cái)產(chǎn),必然在當(dāng)事人的內(nèi)部關(guān)系產(chǎn)生法律效果,而物權(quán)對抗效力產(chǎn)生法律效力僅于物權(quán)人與交易第三人利益發(fā)生沖突的情形,其所要解決的問題是該項(xiàng)已經(jīng)依法發(fā)生的物權(quán)變動(dòng)是否在外部關(guān)系上產(chǎn)生相應(yīng)法律效果。也即婚內(nèi)財(cái)產(chǎn)分割協(xié)議引起的物權(quán)變動(dòng)效力是絕對的,而物權(quán)對抗效力則具有可能性。文章首先論述婚內(nèi)財(cái)產(chǎn)分割協(xié)議的物權(quán)變動(dòng)效力,通過類型化分析婚內(nèi)財(cái)產(chǎn)分割協(xié)議的物權(quán)變動(dòng)效力,更加深入地了解婚內(nèi)財(cái)產(chǎn)分割協(xié)議在我國司法實(shí)務(wù)中的運(yùn)行模式。繼而對婚內(nèi)財(cái)產(chǎn)分割協(xié)議物權(quán)對抗效力進(jìn)行分析,并對其特征展開討論。第三部分:通過我國與英國在夫妻財(cái)產(chǎn)制方面的比較評析發(fā)現(xiàn)英國妻約定財(cái)產(chǎn)制的內(nèi)涵與我國實(shí)務(wù)中婚內(nèi)財(cái)產(chǎn)分割協(xié)議的運(yùn)用具有相似點(diǎn)。英國夫妻財(cái)產(chǎn)制制度體系完整,整個(gè)制度周密而實(shí)踐性強(qiáng),且類型法定的約定財(cái)產(chǎn)制為司法實(shí)務(wù)帶來巨大便利,如此益處我們應(yīng)當(dāng)取之為我國特有之夫妻財(cái)產(chǎn)制度構(gòu)建相應(yīng)理論。第四部分:闡釋司法判決中婚內(nèi)財(cái)產(chǎn)分割協(xié)議對我國夫妻財(cái)產(chǎn)規(guī)范的意義及分析其在司法運(yùn)用中存在的問題�；閮�(nèi)財(cái)產(chǎn)分割協(xié)議確保了夫妻約定財(cái)產(chǎn)制在我國社會(huì)生活中的運(yùn)用實(shí)效,彌補(bǔ)了我國法律中關(guān)于分居制度的法律空白,使得處于分居狀態(tài)下的夫妻間的財(cái)產(chǎn)關(guān)系可以通過法律方式解決。同時(shí)婚內(nèi)財(cái)產(chǎn)分割協(xié)議為更新我國夫妻財(cái)產(chǎn)制提供實(shí)踐經(jīng)驗(yàn),形成一種"自下而上"的立法及理論推動(dòng),使得我國夫妻財(cái)產(chǎn)制隨著社會(huì)的變化發(fā)展在實(shí)踐中得到不斷的更新完善。但是,由于缺乏明確法律規(guī)定,其在實(shí)務(wù)中存在一些問題。第五部分:"民法典時(shí)代"的開啟,婚內(nèi)財(cái)產(chǎn)分割協(xié)議對《民法典》夫妻財(cái)產(chǎn)制完善的具有重要意義�；橐鼍幍木唧w編撰近在咫尺,各學(xué)者對于《民法典》夫妻財(cái)產(chǎn)制的建議稿必將為立法委員會(huì)重視,因此,對于國內(nèi)目前較為前沿的夫妻約定財(cái)產(chǎn)制立法建議進(jìn)行分析研究,發(fā)現(xiàn)其中的不足,結(jié)合筆者對實(shí)務(wù)中婚內(nèi)財(cái)產(chǎn)分割協(xié)議的研究,提出幾點(diǎn)建議。
[Abstract]:The agreement on the division of marital property, the non legal concept inherent in our judicial practice, is the product of the judicial practice that the judges actively make up for the existing marital property system in our country that the system of marital property system can not meet the actual needs of the marriage parties, which to some extent alleviates the practical difficulties brought by the legal gap of the separation system in China. "Biology" means that the agreement on property segmentation in marriage is faced with the lack of legal theory, the unclear legal status and the complexity of the effectiveness of judicial judgment in the twelfth phase of.2014. "Tang, a, Li Mou, Tang Mouyi's legal succession dispute case" again pushed the real problem to the theoretical circle, making the theory research on the property division agreement within marriage. The first part: the first part: on the basis of a large number of cases collating collection and extensive reading of relevant literature, combined with the application of the judicial practice, analysis of cases, first explains the components of the marital property division agreement, and then determine the legal nature of the marital property division agreement, the definition of the property division agreement in marriage, composition It is a necessary and essential tool to solve the legal problems. The concept is a necessary and necessary tool to solve the legal problems. Through the comprehensive summary of the connotation in the judicial practice of the property division agreement in our country, it is clear that the theory frame which conforms to the agreed property system of our husband and wife is the manifestation of the marital property system in our country. In the second part, the validity of the property division agreement in marriage mainly includes: the effect of the property change, the effect of the real right confrontation. The marital property division agreement leads to the marriage property division agreement. The effect of the change of real right and the effect of the real right antagonism have the particularity in the relationship between the internal and external. The law has to distinguish between the theory and the practice of the effect of the change of property right in the real right of the husband and wife (internal) and the security of the third party (external) right of real right confrontation. At the time of movement, the effect of the change of property right on the property that the husband and wife agreed on, must have legal effect in the internal relations of the parties, and the legal effect of the real right confrontation effect is only in the case of the conflict between the interests of the real right person and the third party of the transaction, and the problem to be solved is whether the change of the real right of property is outside the law. The relationship has the corresponding legal effect. That is, the effect of property change caused by the property division agreement in marriage is absolute, and the validity of the real right confrontation is possible. First, the article discusses the effect of the change of property right in the marriage property division agreement, through the type analysis of the effect of the change of property right in the marriage property division, and more deeply understand the marriage. The operation mode of the internal property division agreement in our country's judicial practice. Then it analyses the effect of the property right confrontation in the marital property division agreement and discusses its characteristics. The third part: through the comparison and analysis of the marital property system between China and the UK, the connotation of the British wife's agreed property system and the marital property in our country's practice are found. The application of the cut agreement is similar. The system system of the British husband and wife property system is complete, the whole system is careful and the practice is strong, and the legal property system of the legal type brings great convenience to the judicial practice. So we should take it as the corresponding theory of the husband and wife property system of our country. The fourth part explains the marriage in the judicial decision. The meaning of the internal property division agreement and the problems in the judicial application of the husband and wife in our country. The agreement on the division of property in marriage ensures the actual effect of the application of the marital property system in the social life of our country, and makes up for the legal blank of the separation system in the law of our country, and makes the husband and wife in the state of separation. Property relations can be solved by law. At the same time, the agreement on property division in marriage provides practical experience to update the property system of husband and wife in our country, and forms a "bottom-up" legislation and theory, which makes the property system of husband and wife in our country be constantly updated and perfected in practice with the change of society. However, because of lack of clear law, the property system of husband and wife in our country is constantly updated and perfected. There are some problems in practice. The fifth part: the opening of the "civil code era", the agreement on property division in marriage is of great significance to the improvement of the civil code and the marital property system. In the current more frontier, the legislative proposal of the marital property system is analyzed, and the shortcomings are found, and some suggestions are put forward in combination with the author's research on the marriage property division agreement in practice.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：南京大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D923.9
，

本文編號：1899085