本文選題：隔代探望 + 法無(wú)禁止即可為��； 參考：《法律適用》2017年23期

【摘要】：近年來(lái),隔代探望權(quán)爭(zhēng)議問(wèn)題逐漸成為帶有普遍性的社會(huì)現(xiàn)象。司法實(shí)踐中存在較大爭(zhēng)議,并未形成相對(duì)一致的觀點(diǎn)。應(yīng)當(dāng)認(rèn)為,隔代探望的主張,在"兒童利益最大"目的、法無(wú)禁止即可為的私法自治精神以及情理司法裁判考量等角度均具合理性與必要性。因而,隔代探望應(yīng)當(dāng)作為一種相對(duì)獨(dú)立的權(quán)利樣態(tài)予以承認(rèn)和尊重。但同樣需要注意的是,祖父母、外祖父母隔代探望權(quán)的主張往往與直接撫養(yǎng)子女的離婚父母一方在生活安寧權(quán)上存在權(quán)利沖突,故而對(duì)隔代探望權(quán)而言不能作絕對(duì)化的理解,而必須考慮類(lèi)型化區(qū)分。經(jīng)由歸納,"代位型"與"代為型"隔代探望具備正當(dāng)基礎(chǔ),且不侵犯協(xié)助義務(wù)者的安寧權(quán),而"單純離婚型"的隔代探望訴求,已經(jīng)被不直接撫養(yǎng)子女離婚父母一方的探望權(quán)所包容和吸收,不宜再作為獨(dú)立的權(quán)利樣態(tài)賦予祖父母或外祖父母。
[Abstract]:In recent years, the issue of intergenerational visitation rights has gradually become a universal social phenomenon. There is a great dispute in judicial practice and there is not a relatively consistent view. It should be considered that the idea of intergenerational visitation is reasonable and necessary from the point of view of "the best interests of the child", the spirit of autonomy in private law without prohibition and the consideration of rational and judicial decisions. Therefore, intergenerational visitation should be recognized and respected as a relatively independent right. However, it is also important to note that grandparents' claim of the right to visit next generation often conflicts with the right to peace of life of one of the divorced parents who directly raise their children. Therefore, the right to visit from another generation cannot be understood in an absolute way. The typological distinction must be considered. By summing up, the "subrogation" and "surrogate" visits have a proper foundation and do not infringe the right of peace of the assisting duty, while the "simple divorce" intergenerational visitation demands. It has been accepted and absorbed by parents who do not directly support their children, and should not be given to grandparents as an independent right.
【作者單位】： 江蘇省無(wú)錫市中級(jí)人民法院;華東政法大學(xué);
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D923.9
，

本文編號(hào)：1894022