本文選題：離婚　切入點：損害賠償　出處：《遼寧大學》2012年碩士論文　論文類型：學位論文

【摘要】：我國的離婚損害賠償制度作為一種離婚救濟制度是由2001年修正后的《中華人民共和國婚姻法》確立的,其法律意義體現(xiàn)在該制度填補了新中國有關(guān)婚姻損害賠償制度的立法空白,其積極作用體現(xiàn)在既可以有效制裁離婚損害賠償訴訟中的過錯方同時又可以切實保護無過錯方。根據(jù)統(tǒng)計分析在離婚損害賠償訴訟中最核心最關(guān)鍵的問題是無過錯方舉證問題。在司法實踐中,無過錯方由于有形證據(jù)消失、缺乏目擊證人、無法獲取證據(jù)等諸多原因難以對過錯方的過錯行為進行有效舉證,往往導致無過錯方不得不承擔賠償比率過低甚至敗訴等后果。從離婚損害賠償制度立法的初衷來看,無過錯方因舉證難承擔不利的訴訟后果是當初該制度立法者未預料到或不期望看到的。本論文從完善離婚損害賠償制度目的出發(fā)選擇離婚損害賠償訴訟中舉證難這一關(guān)鍵問題進行研究,凸顯出極其重要的現(xiàn)實意義和一定的理論價值。 為解決離婚損害賠償訴訟中無過錯方舉證難問題,本論文的第一部分從制度困境層面分析了在我國離婚損害賠償訴訟中無過錯方因取證方式缺乏法律支持、證明標準要求過高、舉證責任分配不合理等原因存在舉證難問題；第二部分從無過錯方私人取證合法性的有條件確認、拓寬無過錯方取證途徑探討、完善調(diào)查令制度保障無過錯方取證等三方面提出了強化無過錯方取證法律支持的方法；第三部分探討了以表見證明、推定證明和利益平衡等理論為基礎(chǔ)采取相關(guān)措施達到降低無過錯方證明標準的目的；第四章提出了在離婚損害賠償訴訟中法院在舉證責任分配上采用舉證責任倒置的條件及不得采用舉證責任倒置的例外情形。 本論文系統(tǒng)的提出了用于解決離婚損害賠償訴訟舉證難問題的具體對策及各種綜合措施,對解決無過錯方舉證難問題、切實保護無過錯方、維護婚姻當事人的合法權(quán)益、完善我國離婚損害賠償制度具有重要意義。
[Abstract]:As a system of divorce relief, the system of compensation for divorce damages in China was established by the Marriage Law of the people's Republic of China, which was amended in 2001. Its legal significance is reflected in the fact that the system has filled the legislative gap in the system of compensation for marital damages in New China. Its positive effect can not only sanction the fault party in the lawsuit of divorce damages, but also protect the no-fault party. According to the statistical analysis, the core and the most key problem in the lawsuit of divorce damage compensation is non-past. In judicial practice, Due to the disappearance of tangible evidence, the lack of eyewitnesses and the inability to obtain evidence, it is difficult for the no-fault party to prove the fault behavior of the fault party effectively. It often results in the no-fault party having to bear the consequences such as too low compensation ratio or even losing litigation. From the original intention of the legislation of divorce damage compensation system, It is not expected or expected that the lawmaker of this system did not expect or expect to see the unfavorable litigation consequence of the no-fault party because of the difficulty of proof. This thesis chooses the difficulty of proving in the lawsuit of divorce damages from the aim of perfecting the system of divorce damages. This key issue is studied, Highlights the extremely important realistic significance and certain theory value. In order to solve the problem of the proof of no-fault party in the lawsuit of divorce damages, the first part of this paper analyzes the lack of legal support for the way of obtaining evidence in the lawsuit of divorce damage compensation in our country from the level of system predicament. The reasons such as too high standard of proof, unreasonable distribution of burden of proof and so on, are difficult to prove. The second part discusses how to confirm the legitimacy of private forensics of no-fault party, and to broaden the ways of obtaining evidence by no-fault party. The third part discusses how to strengthen the legal support of the no-fault party to obtain evidence from three aspects, such as perfecting the investigation order system to ensure the no-fault party to obtain evidence. Based on the theory of presumption proof and interest balance, relevant measures are taken to reduce the proof standard of no-fault party. Chapter 4th puts forward the condition that the burden of proof should be reversed in the distribution of the burden of proof in the lawsuit of divorce damages and the exception that the burden of proof should not be reversed. This paper systematically puts forward the concrete countermeasures and various comprehensive measures to solve the difficult problem of adducing proof in the lawsuit for divorce damages, which can effectively protect the no-fault party, protect the legitimate rights and interests of the marriage party, and solve the problem of proof difficulty of the no-fault party, so as to protect the legal rights and interests of the marriage party. It is of great significance to perfect the system of compensation for divorce damages in China.
【學位授予單位】：遼寧大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：D923.9

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 于東輝;對離婚損害賠償制度的幾點思考[J];山東工商學院學報;2003年03期

2 張競芳;離婚損害賠償適用中的若干問題[J];當代法學;2002年06期

3 黃建水;離婚過錯損害賠償制度的理論與實踐[J];當代法學;2002年08期

4 張海敏;;從倫理學角度淺析離婚損害賠償制度的完善[J];道德與文明;2007年02期

5 田嵐,何俊萍;論離婚有過錯方的精神損害賠償責任——析因配偶一方婚外戀導致離婚的現(xiàn)狀及其民事責任[J];東南學術(shù);2001年02期

6 湯維建;論民事訴訟中的舉證責任倒置[J];法律適用(國家法官學院學報);2002年06期

7 陳葦;離婚損害賠償法律適用若干問題探討[J];法商研究(中南政法學院學報);2002年02期

8 龍翼飛;;婚姻家庭法律制度與構(gòu)建和諧社會[J];法學家;2007年01期

9 羅麗;論日本的離婚撫慰金制度[J];法學評論;2002年02期

10 陳建文;;論婚姻損害賠償[J];經(jīng)濟與社會發(fā)展;2006年04期

相關(guān)碩士學位論文 前1條

1 國敏英;離婚精神損害賠償法律問題研究[D];蘭州大學;2010年

，

本文編號：1619044