論我國離婚精神損害賠償?shù)姆赏晟?/H1>
發(fā)布時間：2018-03-03 06:44
本文選題：婚姻法 切入點：離婚 出處：《對外經(jīng)濟貿(mào)易大學(xué)》2007年碩士論文 論文類型：學(xué)位論文
【摘要】： 2001年4月28日公布施行的《中華人民共和國婚姻法》第四十六條規(guī)定了離婚損害賠償制度,最高人民法院《關(guān)于適用中華人民共和國婚姻法若干問題的解釋(一)》正式明確了離婚損害賠償包括物質(zhì)損害賠償及精神損害賠償兩方面,這是離婚立法改革的重大成果。 首先,筆者就離婚精神損害賠償?shù)母拍�、特征及意義進行了論述。離婚精神損害賠償是指配偶一方違法侵害配偶他方的合法權(quán)益,導(dǎo)致婚姻關(guān)系破裂,離婚時無過錯配偶所受的精神利益的損害和精神創(chuàng)傷,過錯配偶應(yīng)承擔(dān)的民事責(zé)任。離婚精神損害賠償是加強社會主義法制的需要,是建立和諧社會的需要,是保護無過錯方配偶合法權(quán)益、制裁過錯方的需要。離婚精神損害賠償須有違法行為、損害事實、主觀過錯、因果關(guān)系四個法定要件和四種法定原因。責(zé)任方式包括財產(chǎn)責(zé)任和非財產(chǎn)責(zé)任兩種方式。 其次,筆者就離婚精神賠償數(shù)額確定的法定因素和酌定考慮因素進行論述。指出過錯情況、損害后果、經(jīng)濟因素作為法定因素來考慮,而結(jié)婚時間、對家庭貢獻大小、社會地位、加害人的事后態(tài)度等一起作為酌定考慮因素,使賠償數(shù)額的確定既合法又合情合理。 最后,筆者就離婚精神損害賠償中若干問題進行初步探討,同時嘗試提出一些立法建議。筆者就離婚精神損害賠償?shù)恼埱髾?quán)利主體和義務(wù)主體進行探討,認為賠償權(quán)利主體應(yīng)拓寬為受害者;存在主觀過錯的第三者承擔(dān)連帶賠償責(zé)任。筆者就離婚精神損害賠償請求權(quán)利行使的時間進行論述,并就離婚精神損害賠償請求權(quán)的讓與和繼承進行分析。筆者結(jié)合司法實踐,就離婚精神損害賠償中請求方是否一定以“無過錯為原則”和“誰主張誰舉證”的證據(jù)原則進行探討,提出區(qū)別過錯,過錯相抵的原則來裁判案件;提出應(yīng)該區(qū)分不同情況分別對待,對無過錯配偶的舉證確難到位的特定情況,可適用過錯推定原則;就當前社會上“其他導(dǎo)致離婚的重大過錯”提出我國立法技術(shù)上應(yīng)采取列舉性規(guī)定和概括性規(guī)定相結(jié)合的方式,以保持立法的穩(wěn)定性和長期性。
[Abstract]:Article 46th of the Marriage Law of the people's Republic of China, promulgated on April 28th 2001, provides for the system of compensation for divorce damages. The interpretation (1) of the Supreme people's Court concerning the application of the Marriage Law of the people's Republic of China (1) makes it clear that the compensation for divorce damages includes material damages and spiritual damages, which is a major achievement of the legislative reform on divorce. First of all, the author discusses the concept, characteristics and significance of the moral damage compensation for divorce, which means that one spouse violates the lawful rights and interests of the other spouse, which results in the breakdown of the marriage relationship. At the time of divorce, it is necessary to strengthen the socialist legal system and to build a harmonious society. It is the need to protect the lawful rights and interests of the spouse of the no-fault party and to punish the wrongdoing party. There are four legal elements and four legal reasons for causation. The way of liability includes two ways: property liability and non-property liability. Secondly, the author discusses the legal factors and discretionary factors for determining the amount of spiritual compensation for divorce. The author points out that fault situation, damage consequences, economic factors are considered as legal factors, while the time of marriage contributes to the family. The social status and the hindsight attitude of the victimizer are considered as the discretionary factors together, which make the determination of the amount of compensation legal and reasonable. Finally, the author makes a preliminary discussion on some problems in the compensation for moral damages of divorce, and tries to put forward some legislative suggestions. The author thinks that the subject of the right of compensation should be broadened to be the victim, the third party with subjective fault shall bear the joint and several liability for compensation. The author also analyzes the alienation and inheritance of the right to claim for moral damages in divorce. This paper discusses whether the claimant must take the principle of "no-fault" and "who claims who proves the evidence" to judge the case, and puts forward the principle of distinguishing fault and offsetting the fault; It is suggested that different cases should be treated separately, and the principle of presumption of fault can be applied to certain cases in which the proof of no-fault spouse is difficult to put in place. With regard to the "other major faults leading to divorce" in the society at present, the author puts forward that the legislation of our country should adopt the combination of enumeration and generality in order to maintain the stability and long-term nature of the legislation.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：對外經(jīng)濟貿(mào)易大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2007
【分類號】：D923.9
【引證文獻】
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條
1 張磊蕾;離婚中的精神損害賠償[D];華東政法大學(xué);2011年
，
本文編號：1559949
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/hyflw/1559949.html
本文選題：婚姻法 切入點：離婚 出處：《對外經(jīng)濟貿(mào)易大學(xué)》2007年碩士論文 論文類型：學(xué)位論文
【摘要】： 2001年4月28日公布施行的《中華人民共和國婚姻法》第四十六條規(guī)定了離婚損害賠償制度,最高人民法院《關(guān)于適用中華人民共和國婚姻法若干問題的解釋(一)》正式明確了離婚損害賠償包括物質(zhì)損害賠償及精神損害賠償兩方面,這是離婚立法改革的重大成果。 首先,筆者就離婚精神損害賠償?shù)母拍�、特征及意義進行了論述。離婚精神損害賠償是指配偶一方違法侵害配偶他方的合法權(quán)益,導(dǎo)致婚姻關(guān)系破裂,離婚時無過錯配偶所受的精神利益的損害和精神創(chuàng)傷,過錯配偶應(yīng)承擔(dān)的民事責(zé)任。離婚精神損害賠償是加強社會主義法制的需要,是建立和諧社會的需要,是保護無過錯方配偶合法權(quán)益、制裁過錯方的需要。離婚精神損害賠償須有違法行為、損害事實、主觀過錯、因果關(guān)系四個法定要件和四種法定原因。責(zé)任方式包括財產(chǎn)責(zé)任和非財產(chǎn)責(zé)任兩種方式。 其次,筆者就離婚精神賠償數(shù)額確定的法定因素和酌定考慮因素進行論述。指出過錯情況、損害后果、經(jīng)濟因素作為法定因素來考慮,而結(jié)婚時間、對家庭貢獻大小、社會地位、加害人的事后態(tài)度等一起作為酌定考慮因素,使賠償數(shù)額的確定既合法又合情合理。 最后,筆者就離婚精神損害賠償中若干問題進行初步探討,同時嘗試提出一些立法建議。筆者就離婚精神損害賠償?shù)恼埱髾?quán)利主體和義務(wù)主體進行探討,認為賠償權(quán)利主體應(yīng)拓寬為受害者;存在主觀過錯的第三者承擔(dān)連帶賠償責(zé)任。筆者就離婚精神損害賠償請求權(quán)利行使的時間進行論述,并就離婚精神損害賠償請求權(quán)的讓與和繼承進行分析。筆者結(jié)合司法實踐,就離婚精神損害賠償中請求方是否一定以“無過錯為原則”和“誰主張誰舉證”的證據(jù)原則進行探討,提出區(qū)別過錯,過錯相抵的原則來裁判案件;提出應(yīng)該區(qū)分不同情況分別對待,對無過錯配偶的舉證確難到位的特定情況,可適用過錯推定原則;就當前社會上“其他導(dǎo)致離婚的重大過錯”提出我國立法技術(shù)上應(yīng)采取列舉性規(guī)定和概括性規(guī)定相結(jié)合的方式,以保持立法的穩(wěn)定性和長期性。
[Abstract]:Article 46th of the Marriage Law of the people's Republic of China, promulgated on April 28th 2001, provides for the system of compensation for divorce damages. The interpretation (1) of the Supreme people's Court concerning the application of the Marriage Law of the people's Republic of China (1) makes it clear that the compensation for divorce damages includes material damages and spiritual damages, which is a major achievement of the legislative reform on divorce. First of all, the author discusses the concept, characteristics and significance of the moral damage compensation for divorce, which means that one spouse violates the lawful rights and interests of the other spouse, which results in the breakdown of the marriage relationship. At the time of divorce, it is necessary to strengthen the socialist legal system and to build a harmonious society. It is the need to protect the lawful rights and interests of the spouse of the no-fault party and to punish the wrongdoing party. There are four legal elements and four legal reasons for causation. The way of liability includes two ways: property liability and non-property liability. Secondly, the author discusses the legal factors and discretionary factors for determining the amount of spiritual compensation for divorce. The author points out that fault situation, damage consequences, economic factors are considered as legal factors, while the time of marriage contributes to the family. The social status and the hindsight attitude of the victimizer are considered as the discretionary factors together, which make the determination of the amount of compensation legal and reasonable. Finally, the author makes a preliminary discussion on some problems in the compensation for moral damages of divorce, and tries to put forward some legislative suggestions. The author thinks that the subject of the right of compensation should be broadened to be the victim, the third party with subjective fault shall bear the joint and several liability for compensation. The author also analyzes the alienation and inheritance of the right to claim for moral damages in divorce. This paper discusses whether the claimant must take the principle of "no-fault" and "who claims who proves the evidence" to judge the case, and puts forward the principle of distinguishing fault and offsetting the fault; It is suggested that different cases should be treated separately, and the principle of presumption of fault can be applied to certain cases in which the proof of no-fault spouse is difficult to put in place. With regard to the "other major faults leading to divorce" in the society at present, the author puts forward that the legislation of our country should adopt the combination of enumeration and generality in order to maintain the stability and long-term nature of the legislation.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：對外經(jīng)濟貿(mào)易大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2007
【分類號】：D923.9
【引證文獻】
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條
1 張磊蕾;離婚中的精神損害賠償[D];華東政法大學(xué);2011年
，本文編號：1559949
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/hyflw/1559949.html
