本文關(guān)鍵詞： 醫(yī)療欠費 扶養(yǎng)義務(wù) 請求權(quán)基礎(chǔ)　出處：《浙江大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：早在多年前拖欠醫(yī)療費糾紛的媒體報道就不少,學(xué)界對此的研究也從未終止,然而學(xué)界似乎有著一種慣性思維:認(rèn)為在醫(yī)療機構(gòu)與患者的關(guān)系中,患者似乎總是處于弱勢一方。因此學(xué)界大部分的關(guān)注點都在于當(dāng)醫(yī)患糾紛發(fā)生時,醫(yī)院可能對患者造成的侵權(quán),以及醫(yī)療服務(wù)合同這一無名合同的法律性質(zhì)研究,而忽視了當(dāng)醫(yī)患糾紛發(fā)生時,作為提供了醫(yī)療服務(wù)而未獲取足額醫(yī)療費用的醫(yī)療機構(gòu)方在追索醫(yī)療費的請求權(quán)基礎(chǔ)研究,以至于如今這一問題在法學(xué)界似乎還是空白。本文由引言、正文三章以及結(jié)論組成。引言部分主要為選題背景和寫作目的;第二章為醫(yī)療機構(gòu)追索醫(yī)療欠費糾紛的司法現(xiàn)狀,筆者通過相關(guān)不同判案件的分析,將其從承擔(dān)主體和承擔(dān)基礎(chǔ)兩個方面進行分類,其中承擔(dān)主體又可分為單一主體和多數(shù)主體,承擔(dān)基礎(chǔ)分為醫(yī)療服務(wù)合同義務(wù)、患者與扶養(yǎng)義務(wù)人義務(wù)以及患者死亡情況下的繼承人有限清償?shù)牧x務(wù)。該章從典型案例入手,將我國現(xiàn)階段相關(guān)司法案例進行簡單羅列并加以分析探討。第三章為醫(yī)療機構(gòu)追索醫(yī)療欠費問題的法理分析。該部分對本問題最基本的醫(yī)療服務(wù)法律關(guān)系、扶養(yǎng)義務(wù)關(guān)系、責(zé)任分析三個部分的法理進行相應(yīng)分析。醫(yī)療服務(wù)合同的主體范圍是哪些,合同性質(zhì)究竟為何,扶養(yǎng)義務(wù)性質(zhì)又是什么,責(zé)任形態(tài)如何等問題進行了分析。第四章為醫(yī)療機構(gòu)追索醫(yī)療欠費問題的法律建議,該部分筆者通過有關(guān)理論的分析,建議司法機構(gòu)在審理案件時可以將視野打開,雖然其審判職能依據(jù)我國現(xiàn)有法律規(guī)定,但是其可以將各部門法結(jié)合起來。司法機關(guān)在審判相關(guān)案件時不一定只局限在合同法的范圍內(nèi),還可以將合同法與婚姻家庭法、繼承法等相關(guān)法律相互結(jié)合的靈活運用。最后結(jié)語部分筆者以最精簡的語言概括所表達的觀點。
[Abstract]:As early as many years ago, there were a lot of media reports about the disputes over medical expenses, and the academic research on this has never stopped. However, the academic community seems to have a kind of inertia thinking: in the relationship between medical institutions and patients. Patients always seem to be on the weak side. Therefore, most of the attention of the academic community is that when the doctor-patient dispute occurs, the hospital may cause infringement on the patient. As well as the medical service contract this nameless contract legal nature research, but neglected when the doctor patient dispute occurs. As a medical institution that has provided medical services but has not obtained the full medical expenses, it is the basic research of the claim right of medical expenses, so that this problem seems to be blank in the field of law. The main body three chapters as well as the conclusion composition. The introduction part mainly for the topic choice background and the writing purpose; The second chapter is the judicial status quo of medical institutions seeking medical disputes. The author classifies the cases from two aspects: the main body and the basis. Among them, the main body can be divided into a single subject and most of the main body, the basis of which is the obligation of medical service contract. The obligations of the patient and the maintenance obligor and the limited payment of the heirs in the case of the death of the patient. This chapter starts with typical cases. The third chapter is the legal analysis of medical institutions to recover medical arrears. This part of the most basic legal relationship of medical services. What is the scope of the main body of the medical service contract, what is the nature of the contract, and what is the nature of the maintenance obligation. Chapter 4th is the legal advice for medical institutions to recover the medical care arrears, this part of the author through the relevant theoretical analysis. It is suggested that judicial organs should open their horizons when trying cases, although their judicial functions are based on the existing legal provisions of our country. However, it can combine all branches of law. The judicial organs in the trial of related cases are not necessarily confined to the scope of contract law, but also contract law and marriage and family law. The flexible application of inheritance law and other related laws. Finally, the conclusion summarizes the views expressed in the most concise language.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：浙江大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D922.16

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 韓世遠;;醫(yī)療服務(wù)合同的不完全履行及其救濟[J];法學(xué)研究;2005年06期

，

本文編號：1480612