發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-10-18 19:42

【摘要】：隨著經(jīng)濟(jì)社會(huì)的快速發(fā)展，環(huán)境問(wèn)題日益凸顯。環(huán)境問(wèn)題不僅影響人們的日常生活，而且破壞整個(gè)社會(huì)的可持續(xù)發(fā)展。我國(guó)也結(jié)合實(shí)際情況，制定了多項(xiàng)環(huán)境保護(hù)和環(huán)境侵權(quán)救濟(jì)的法律法規(guī)。但是在利用環(huán)境會(huì)計(jì)理論，將財(cái)務(wù)保證，如寄存擔(dān)保金，準(zhǔn)備金等方式運(yùn)用于環(huán)境侵權(quán)救濟(jì)方面的法律還不太成熟。本文正是基于我國(guó)對(duì)環(huán)境損害賠償準(zhǔn)備金制度的研究不足甚至空白，借鑒國(guó)外的立法經(jīng)驗(yàn)，從對(duì)它建立的必要性，可行性和具體制度的設(shè)立等問(wèn)題進(jìn)行了較為深入的研究，提出了自己的淺見(jiàn)。筆者認(rèn)為，研究損害賠償準(zhǔn)備金制度的意義在于:損害賠償準(zhǔn)備金制度一方面具有保障受害者獲得及時(shí)和充分的損害救濟(jì)，確保公眾環(huán)境權(quán)得以實(shí)現(xiàn)的重要功能，另一方面還能夠相應(yīng)提升污染項(xiàng)目業(yè)主的環(huán)境保護(hù)意識(shí)和環(huán)境管理水平，督促示其努力做好環(huán)境的保護(hù)工作，從而使損失降到最低。最后，它對(duì)于環(huán)境污染事件的事前預(yù)防起到了積極的重要。所以，無(wú)論是對(duì)于受害者還是對(duì)于污染者、無(wú)論對(duì)于事后救濟(jì)還是對(duì)于事前預(yù)防，都具有重要的意義。 本文分引言、正文、結(jié)論三個(gè)部分。 引言部分，簡(jiǎn)要介紹了我國(guó)建立環(huán)境侵權(quán)損害賠償準(zhǔn)備金制度的必要性和重要意義。 正文部分共分三章。第一章概述環(huán)境侵權(quán)的基本理論，包括環(huán)境權(quán)，環(huán)境侵權(quán)，環(huán)境權(quán)益三者的內(nèi)涵和關(guān)系，這是本文立論的基礎(chǔ)。同時(shí)還介紹了環(huán)境侵權(quán)損害賠償準(zhǔn)備金制度的含義，與國(guó)內(nèi)外相似制度的比較。第二章詳細(xì)闡述了環(huán)境侵權(quán)損害賠償準(zhǔn)備金制度建立的必要性與可行性，理論必要性主要是指環(huán)境會(huì)計(jì)理論的支持，而現(xiàn)實(shí)必要性涵蓋三個(gè)方面：保障公眾環(huán)境權(quán)益，維護(hù)法律的尊嚴(yán)，督促企業(yè)關(guān)注環(huán)境，減少損失的發(fā)生，保護(hù)環(huán)境和經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展，維護(hù)社會(huì)的穩(wěn)定；理論可行性包括兩個(gè)方面：污染者付費(fèi)原則和預(yù)防原則，而現(xiàn)實(shí)必要性是從國(guó)家，企業(yè)和社會(huì)的角度予以闡述的。第三章詳細(xì)分析了環(huán)境侵權(quán)損害賠償準(zhǔn)備金制度的構(gòu)建，其中包括立法模式的選擇，制度的設(shè)計(jì)原則，，賠償準(zhǔn)備金的計(jì)提范圍及其計(jì)算方法。 結(jié)論部分，總結(jié)了本文的研究成果，提出了建立環(huán)境侵權(quán)損害賠償準(zhǔn)備金制度的幾點(diǎn)建議，以期完善相關(guān)制度，更好地保護(hù)公民的環(huán)境權(quán)益和促進(jìn)社會(huì)的可持續(xù)發(fā)展。
[Abstract]:With the rapid development of economy and society, environmental problems have become increasingly prominent. Environmental problems not only affect people's daily life, but also destroy the sustainable development of the whole society. Our country also combines the actual situation, has formulated many environmental protection and the environmental tort relief laws and regulations. However, the application of financial guarantee, such as deposit guarantee and reserve fund, to environmental tort relief is not mature. Based on the insufficient or even blank research on the reserve system of environmental damage compensation in our country, this paper makes a deep research on the necessity, feasibility and establishment of the specific system from the experience of foreign legislation. Put forward their own shallow views. The author believes that the significance of studying the system of reserve for damage compensation lies in: on the one hand, the reserve system of damage compensation has the important function of guaranteeing the victims to obtain timely and adequate damage relief and to ensure the realization of public environmental rights. On the other hand, it can also improve the environmental protection consciousness and environmental management level of pollution project owners, urge them to do their best to protect the environment, so as to reduce the loss to the minimum. Finally, it plays a positive role in the prevention of environmental pollution events. Therefore, whether for victims or polluters, whether for ex post relief or prevention, is of great significance. This paper is divided into three parts: introduction, text and conclusion. The introduction briefly introduces the necessity and significance of establishing the reserve system for environmental tort damages in China. The text is divided into three chapters. The first chapter summarizes the basic theory of environmental tort, including environmental rights, environmental tort, environmental rights and interests of the three connotations and relations, which is the basis of this paper. At the same time, it introduces the meaning of the reserve system of environmental tort damage compensation, and compares it with the similar system at home and abroad. The second chapter elaborates the necessity and feasibility of establishing the reserve system of environmental tort damage compensation. The theoretical necessity mainly refers to the support of environmental accounting theory, while the practical necessity covers three aspects: protecting public environmental rights and interests. Maintaining the dignity of the law, urging enterprises to pay attention to the environment, reducing the occurrence of losses, protecting the environment and economic development, and maintaining social stability; the theoretical feasibility includes two aspects: the polluter pays principle and the precautionary principle. But the realistic necessity is from the country, the enterprise and the social angle to give the elaboration. The third chapter analyzes the construction of the reserve system for environmental tort damages in detail, including the choice of legislative model, the design principles of the system, the scope of compensation reserve and its calculation method. The conclusion part summarizes the research results of this paper and puts forward some suggestions on establishing the reserve system for environmental tort damages in order to perfect the relevant system better protect citizens' environmental rights and interests and promote the sustainable development of society.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：福州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2010
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D922.68

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 徐玉鳳;;計(jì)提或有環(huán)境成本準(zhǔn)備金的可行性分析[J];財(cái)會(huì)通訊(學(xué)術(shù)版);2006年07期

2 李摯萍;論可持續(xù)發(fā)展戰(zhàn)略與金融法律制度的融合[J];東南學(xué)術(shù);2004年02期

3 鄒雄;;論環(huán)境權(quán)益及其救濟(jì)[J];福州大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2008年03期

4 鄒雄;;論環(huán)境侵權(quán)救濟(jì)制度的內(nèi)容與體系[J];廣州大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2005年09期

5 鄒雄;;對(duì)環(huán)境侵權(quán)責(zé)任保險(xiǎn)制度若干問(wèn)題的思考[J];廣州大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2006年03期

6 鄒雄;;論環(huán)境權(quán)的概念[J];現(xiàn)代法學(xué);2008年05期

7 趙海濤;;環(huán)境侵權(quán)損害賠償社會(huì)化芻議[J];理論學(xué)習(xí);2007年02期

8 趙亞杰;;環(huán)境責(zé)任保險(xiǎn)制度芻議[J];行政與法;2008年05期

9 蔣莉;美國(guó)環(huán)保超級(jí)基金制度及其實(shí)施[J];油氣田環(huán)境保護(hù);2005年01期

10 竺效;;作為立法術(shù)語(yǔ)的“環(huán)境侵權(quán)”之辨析[J];政法論叢;2008年02期

本文編號(hào)：2280173