我國環(huán)境侵權民事司法中的利益衡量研究
發(fā)布時間:2018-10-18 19:22
【摘要】: 利益衡量是常用的司法方法之一,美國和日本等國家環(huán)境侵權民事司法中的利益衡量運用較好且積累了很多有益經驗,國內環(huán)境法學界對環(huán)境侵權民事司法中利益衡量問題的研究較少,而我國相關司法實踐急需理論指導。對我國環(huán)境侵權民事司法中的利益衡量問題進行研究需要解決以下一些基本理論問題:①“利益衡量”在何種背景下出現的?利益衡量的含義是什么?環(huán)境侵權民事司法中的利益衡量有何獨特性?②從比較法層面來看,環(huán)境侵權民事司法中利益衡量運用較好的國家,如美國、日本,有哪些有益的經驗?③我國環(huán)境侵權民事司法中的利益衡量有何缺陷?④如何完善我國環(huán)境侵權民事司法中的利益衡量?等等。 文章采用比較分析、案例分析、邏輯推理、規(guī)范分析、經濟分析、語義分析、歷史分析、實證分析等方法對上述問題進行了初淺的探討,闡述了利益衡量出現的背景,辨析了與利益衡量有關的不同稱謂,重新界定了利益衡量的概念,分析了環(huán)境侵權民事司法中利益衡量的獨特性,考察了美國和日本環(huán)境侵權民事司法中利益衡量的經驗,分析了我國環(huán)境侵權民事司法中利益衡量的問題,認為我國法官處理環(huán)境案件時存在有如法官應用利益衡量的宏觀思維定位不佳、忽視經濟效率分析思維的運用等問題,針對這些問題,在借鑒美國和日本相關經驗的基礎上,提出了完善我國環(huán)境侵權民事司法利益衡量的建議。
[Abstract]:Interest measurement is one of the commonly used judicial methods. In the civil justice of environmental tort such as the United States and Japan, the interest measurement is well used and has accumulated a lot of useful experience. There is little research on the measurement of interests in environmental tort civil justice in domestic environmental law circles, but the relevant judicial practice in our country is in urgent need of theoretical guidance. To study the problem of interest measurement in the civil justice of environmental tort in China, we need to solve the following basic theoretical problems: (1) under what background does "interest measurement" occur? What is the meaning of interest measurement? What is the uniqueness of interest measurement in environmental tort civil justice? (2) from the perspective of comparative law, the countries that use better interest measurement in environmental tort civil justice, such as the United States and Japan, What are the beneficial experiences? (3) what are the shortcomings of the interest measurement in the environmental tort civil justice in China? 4. How to perfect the interest measurement in the environmental tort civil justice in our country? Wait This paper discusses the above problems by means of comparative analysis, case analysis, logical reasoning, normative analysis, economic analysis, semantic analysis, historical analysis and empirical analysis, and expounds the background of interest measurement. This paper analyzes the different appellations related to interest measurement, redefines the concept of interest measurement, analyzes the uniqueness of interest measurement in environmental tort civil justice, and examines the experience of interest measurement in environmental tort civil justice in the United States and Japan. This paper analyzes the problems of interest measurement in the civil justice of environmental tort in our country, and points out that there are some problems in our country's judges' handling of environmental cases, such as the poor positioning of macroscopic thinking of judges' application of interest measurement, the neglect of the use of economic efficiency analysis thinking, and so on. In view of these problems, based on the relevant experiences of the United States and Japan, this paper puts forward some suggestions to improve the measurement of the civil judicial interests of environmental tort in China.
【學位授予單位】:湖南師范大學
【學位級別】:碩士
【學位授予年份】:2008
【分類號】:D922.68;D923
本文編號:2280128
[Abstract]:Interest measurement is one of the commonly used judicial methods. In the civil justice of environmental tort such as the United States and Japan, the interest measurement is well used and has accumulated a lot of useful experience. There is little research on the measurement of interests in environmental tort civil justice in domestic environmental law circles, but the relevant judicial practice in our country is in urgent need of theoretical guidance. To study the problem of interest measurement in the civil justice of environmental tort in China, we need to solve the following basic theoretical problems: (1) under what background does "interest measurement" occur? What is the meaning of interest measurement? What is the uniqueness of interest measurement in environmental tort civil justice? (2) from the perspective of comparative law, the countries that use better interest measurement in environmental tort civil justice, such as the United States and Japan, What are the beneficial experiences? (3) what are the shortcomings of the interest measurement in the environmental tort civil justice in China? 4. How to perfect the interest measurement in the environmental tort civil justice in our country? Wait This paper discusses the above problems by means of comparative analysis, case analysis, logical reasoning, normative analysis, economic analysis, semantic analysis, historical analysis and empirical analysis, and expounds the background of interest measurement. This paper analyzes the different appellations related to interest measurement, redefines the concept of interest measurement, analyzes the uniqueness of interest measurement in environmental tort civil justice, and examines the experience of interest measurement in environmental tort civil justice in the United States and Japan. This paper analyzes the problems of interest measurement in the civil justice of environmental tort in our country, and points out that there are some problems in our country's judges' handling of environmental cases, such as the poor positioning of macroscopic thinking of judges' application of interest measurement, the neglect of the use of economic efficiency analysis thinking, and so on. In view of these problems, based on the relevant experiences of the United States and Japan, this paper puts forward some suggestions to improve the measurement of the civil judicial interests of environmental tort in China.
【學位授予單位】:湖南師范大學
【學位級別】:碩士
【學位授予年份】:2008
【分類號】:D922.68;D923
【引證文獻】
相關碩士學位論文 前3條
1 楊歡;我國水污染侵權民事救濟制度研究[D];南昌大學;2010年
2 周銳;從環(huán)境法理念看環(huán)境司法中法官的法律解釋[D];湖南師范大學;2011年
3 蔣文玉;利益衡量方法在我國環(huán)境侵權案件中的適用研究[D];西南政法大學;2011年
,本文編號:2280128
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/huanjingziyuanfa/2280128.html
最近更新
教材專著