本文選題：環(huán)境治理 + 環(huán)境法律倡導性規(guī)范��； 參考：《山東師范大學》2011年碩士論文

【摘要】：伴隨著人類社會和科學技術(shù)的不斷進步,我國環(huán)境法治建設也取得了蓬勃的發(fā)展。但是,讓眾多的環(huán)境法學者沒有料到的是,這對于環(huán)境治理的效果卻不盡人意,我國的環(huán)境質(zhì)量也越來越讓人感到擔憂。這表明,傳統(tǒng)的環(huán)境治理模式在日益復雜的環(huán)境問題面前顯得力不從心,并不斷地暴露出弊端。此時,倡導性規(guī)范的治理模式就應運而生。倡導性規(guī)范在現(xiàn)實立法中大量的存在,并呈不斷增多的趨勢。但作為一種新型的治理模式,似乎并未引起理論界足夠的重視。 環(huán)境法律倡導性規(guī)范的本質(zhì)旨在強調(diào)政府與社會的共同治理,調(diào)動民眾的積極性,以此來引導人們的環(huán)境行為。這一模式有助于政府高效地應對千變?nèi)f化的環(huán)境問題,并真正的實現(xiàn)廣泛的民眾參與。筆者認為,環(huán)境法律倡導性規(guī)范可以為環(huán)境保護提供一條獨特的路徑。 本文總共分為四個部分: 第一部分,“環(huán)境法律倡導性規(guī)范的概念與特征”,主要是對環(huán)境法律倡導性規(guī)范進行簡要闡述,列舉了我國環(huán)境法律中的倡導性規(guī)范大量存在的情況,并借鑒相關(guān)領(lǐng)域?qū)W者的理念,將其定義為“環(huán)境法律倡導性規(guī)范,是指在環(huán)境法律規(guī)范中,提倡、誘導當事人采用特定的行為模式,為或不為某種行為,以期達到某種特定環(huán)境目的的規(guī)范�！本o接著論述了環(huán)境法律倡導性規(guī)范的事先性、引導性、肯定性、政策性等特征。 第二部分,“環(huán)境法律倡導性規(guī)范的社會適存性及價值分析”。本部分認為,由于傳統(tǒng)治理模式的諸多不足之處,加之政府職能轉(zhuǎn)變的要求,環(huán)境法律倡導性規(guī)范有其產(chǎn)生的必要性,并從環(huán)保意識、環(huán)保文化方面入手,結(jié)合法經(jīng)濟學及可持續(xù)發(fā)展的理論,指出環(huán)境法律倡導性規(guī)范是符合法經(jīng)濟學宗旨的治理方式,因此這種規(guī)范具有社會適存性。環(huán)境法律倡導性規(guī)范具有環(huán)境法律強制性規(guī)范所不能比擬的諸多優(yōu)點,可為現(xiàn)行環(huán)境事務管理提供新的思路,降低環(huán)境管理的成本,促進環(huán)境管理理念的轉(zhuǎn)變,整合現(xiàn)行環(huán)境法律關(guān)系,通過肯定性評價引導主體的行為,完善環(huán)境法治體系等。 第三部分,“我國環(huán)境法律倡導性規(guī)范的主要類型”。本部分通過對我國現(xiàn)行環(huán)境法律規(guī)范的歸納總結(jié),主要將其分為五類:獎勵類規(guī)范、指導類規(guī)范、經(jīng)濟扶持類規(guī)范、協(xié)議類規(guī)范、普及推廣類規(guī)范。獎勵類的規(guī)范是環(huán)境法律倡導性規(guī)范中最顯著的表現(xiàn)形式,是環(huán)境法律倡導性規(guī)范的精髓所在。指導類規(guī)范、經(jīng)濟扶持類規(guī)范、協(xié)議類規(guī)范分別從不同的角度對環(huán)境相對人的行為進行引導,從而以相對緩和的方式來達到社會所追求的環(huán)境保護目的。 第四部分,“我國環(huán)境法律倡導性規(guī)范的完善”,這部分是文章的結(jié)論部分,通過對四類環(huán)境法律倡導性規(guī)范的分析,提出應正確對待、合理配置環(huán)境法律倡導性規(guī)范,且應注重環(huán)境法律倡導性規(guī)范的實施效果,并針對每一類規(guī)范提出相應的完善建議,最終形成相對完善的環(huán)境法律倡導性規(guī)范體系。
[Abstract]:With the continuous progress of human society and science and technology, the construction of environmental rule of law has made vigorous development in our country. However, it is not expected by many environmental law makers that the effect of environmental governance is not satisfactory, and the environmental quality of our country is becoming more and more worrying. In the face of complicated environmental problems, it appears to be ineffective and constantly exposes its disadvantages. At this time, the governance mode of advocating sexual norms arises at the historic moment. The advocacy norms exist in a large number of realistic legislation and are increasing. However, as a new type of governance model, it seems not to have aroused enough attention from the theoretical circle.
The essence of the advocacy norm of environmental law is to emphasize the common governance of the government and the society and to arouse the enthusiasm of the people to guide the people's environmental behavior. This model helps the government to deal with the ever-changing environmental problems efficiently and truly realize the widespread public participation. Provide a unique path for environmental protection.
This article is divided into four parts:
The first part, "the concept and characteristics of environmental law advocacy norms", is mainly a brief exposition of environmental legal advocacy norms, enumerates the existence of a large number of advocacy norms in environmental laws in China, and defines it as "environmental law advocacy norm", which refers to environmental law. In the norm, it advocates, induces the parties to adopt specific behavior patterns, or not for some kind of behavior, in order to achieve a specific environmental goal. "The following is the characteristics of the prior, guiding, affirmative, policy and other characteristics of the environmental legal advocacy norms.
The second part, "social adaptation and value analysis of environmental law advocacy standard". This part believes that, due to the shortcomings of the traditional governance model and the requirements of the transformation of government functions, the necessity of environmental legal advocacy norms has its emergence, and from environmental awareness, environmental protection culture, legal economics and sustainable development. The theory of sustainable development points out that environmental legal advocacy standard is a way to govern the purpose of legal economics. Therefore, this standard has social adaptability. The advocacy standard of environmental law has many advantages unmatched by environmental law compulsory norms, which can provide new ideas for the current environmental affairs management and reduce the formation of environmental management. It promotes the transformation of the concept of environmental management, integrates the existing environmental legal relationship, guides the behavior of the main body through positive evaluation, and consummate the environmental rule by law system.
The third part, "the main type of China's environmental law advocacy standard". Through the summary of the current environmental legal norms of China, this part mainly divides it into five categories: the award class standard, the guidance class standard, the economic support class standard, the protocol class standard, the popularization and popularization class standard. The standard of the award class is the environmental law advocacy norm. The most significant form of expression is the essence of the environmental law advocacy norms. Guidance class norms, economic support class norms, the protocol category norms Guide the behavior of the relative people from different angles, so as to achieve the goal of environmental protection pursued by the society in a relatively mild way.
The fourth part, "the perfection of our country's environmental law advocacy standard", this part is the conclusion part of the article. Through the analysis of the four types of environmental legal advocacy norms, it is proposed that it should be treated correctly and rationally configure the environmental legal advocacy norms, and should pay attention to the implementation effect of the environmental law advocacy norms, and put forward a phase for each category of norms. Finally, a relatively perfect environmental legal advocacy standard system should be formed.
【學位授予單位】：山東師范大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2011
【分類號】：D912.6

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 胡小紅;論私法的強行性規(guī)范[J];安徽大學學報;2000年04期

2 劉宇琦;論行政指導在環(huán)境行政中的運用[J];長春理工大學學報(社會科學版);2005年02期

3 蔡守秋,郭紅欣;環(huán)境保護協(xié)定制度介評[J];重慶大學學報(社會科學版);2005年01期

4 裴洪平,汪勇;我國環(huán)境規(guī)劃發(fā)展趨勢探析[J];重慶環(huán)境科學;2003年02期

5 漆多俊;論經(jīng)濟法的調(diào)整方法[J];法律科學.西北政法學院學報;1991年05期

6 李蓮華 ,戴桂林;環(huán)境協(xié)議與可持續(xù)發(fā)展[J];山東環(huán)境;2003年01期

7 汪習根;;論當代中國法律體系的重心定位[J];法學家;2005年03期

8 羅豪才;畢洪海;;通過軟法的治理[J];法學家;2006年01期

9 錢水苗,鞏固;論環(huán)境行政合同[J];法學評論;2004年05期

10 李艷芳;“促進型立法”研究[J];法學評論;2005年03期

相關(guān)博士學位論文 前2條

1 李傳軒;環(huán)境稅法律制度研究[D];華東政法大學;2008年

2 李曉績;排污權(quán)交易制度研究[D];吉林大學;2009年

相關(guān)碩士學位論文 前10條

1 陳兆開;論環(huán)境行政非強制性管理手段[D];河海大學;2004年

2 崔冬;環(huán)境行政指導制度研究[D];東北林業(yè)大學;2004年

3 朱文玉;環(huán)境行政許可制度之研究[D];東北林業(yè)大學;2005年

4 姜偉國;論環(huán)境行政獎勵[D];河海大學;2006年

5 呂曉君;環(huán)境影響評價有效性研究[D];吉林大學;2006年

6 黃莉敏;環(huán)境行政獎勵制度研究[D];福州大學;2006年

7 李海明;環(huán)境行政指導法律制度研究[D];福州大學;2006年

8 劉磊;論環(huán)境行政指導在我國的運用[D];山東科技大學;2007年

9 楊留強;環(huán)境行政合同制度研究[D];昆明理工大學;2008年

10 于婧;我國環(huán)境行政合同理論與實踐研究[D];山東大學;2010年

，

本文編號：1940419