發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-03-28 18:23

  本文選題：證據(jù)意識　切入點(diǎn)：刑事案件　出處：《城市問題》2014年05期

【摘要】：正近期,河南省高院、檢察院、公安廳、環(huán)保廳四部門聯(lián)合出臺了《關(guān)于依法辦理環(huán)境污染刑事案件的若干意見(試行)》(下簡稱《意見》)。《意見》規(guī)定,對環(huán)境污染刑事案件不能以罰金刑來代替主刑,同時(shí)要加大對罰金的適用力度,慎用緩刑、免刑。《意見》規(guī)定,各級環(huán)保部門辦理環(huán)境污染案件,應(yīng)當(dāng)強(qiáng)化證據(jù)意識,采用現(xiàn)場勘察、調(diào)查詢問、采樣監(jiān)測等行政執(zhí)法方式固定證據(jù);對于涉嫌環(huán)境污染犯罪,其證據(jù)可能滅失或
[Abstract]:Recently, the four departments of Henan Province High Court, Procuratorate, Public Security Department, and Environmental Protection Department jointly issued the "several opinions on handling criminal cases of environmental pollution according to law" > (hereinafter referred to as "opinions"). In criminal cases of environmental pollution, the penalty of fine should not be used instead of the principal punishment, and the application of the fine should be strengthened, the probation should be carefully used, and the punishment should be waived. According to the opinions, environmental protection departments at all levels should strengthen their awareness of evidence in handling environmental pollution cases. Use of administrative law enforcement methods such as on-site investigation, investigation, inquiry, sampling and monitoring to fix evidence; for suspected environmental pollution offences, the evidence may be lost or
【分類號】：D922.68;D927
，

本文編號：1677504