本文選題：環(huán)境權(quán)　切入點(diǎn)：環(huán)保法庭　出處：《西安建筑科技大學(xué)》2011年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：隨著我國(guó)工業(yè)化程度的穩(wěn)步提高,經(jīng)濟(jì)的高速發(fā)展與資源、環(huán)境的矛盾日益尖銳,由于環(huán)境案件的數(shù)量也日益增多,政府與公眾的環(huán)境保護(hù)意識(shí)逐漸的增強(qiáng)。如何及時(shí)、準(zhǔn)確、有效的處理日漸飆升的環(huán)境案件,成為我國(guó)環(huán)境司法領(lǐng)域亟待解決的問(wèn)題。 目前,我國(guó)各級(jí)政府都設(shè)立了不同形式的環(huán)境保護(hù)機(jī)構(gòu),對(duì)環(huán)境糾紛的處理起到了很大作用,但是,僅僅依靠環(huán)保部門(mén)處理日益增多的環(huán)境案件存在許多弊端。為了更有效地執(zhí)行國(guó)家的環(huán)境保護(hù)法律、法規(guī),發(fā)揮法律手段在環(huán)境保護(hù)中的特殊作用。在傳統(tǒng)的民庭、刑庭和行政庭日益完善的同時(shí),建立以環(huán)境保護(hù)宗旨的環(huán)保法庭迫在眉睫。本文認(rèn)為,我國(guó)除了要進(jìn)一步加強(qiáng)環(huán)境執(zhí)法外,還需考慮在各級(jí)人民法院設(shè)立新的審判機(jī)構(gòu)——環(huán)境保護(hù)審判庭。國(guó)內(nèi)有不少學(xué)者對(duì)環(huán)保法庭的建設(shè)予以了高度重視,對(duì)環(huán)保法庭的運(yùn)行的現(xiàn)狀進(jìn)行分析并提出建設(shè)性意見(jiàn)。但其成果是否在更大范圍內(nèi)被廣泛驗(yàn)證及可操作性還有待進(jìn)一步實(shí)踐考驗(yàn)。 本文以紫金礦業(yè)有限公司環(huán)境侵權(quán)個(gè)案為切入點(diǎn),概述了當(dāng)前國(guó)內(nèi)環(huán)保法庭的設(shè)置和運(yùn)行現(xiàn)狀,并總結(jié)出當(dāng)前環(huán)保法庭實(shí)踐中其設(shè)置及運(yùn)行過(guò)程中出現(xiàn)的問(wèn)題及原因。并借鑒西方國(guó)家在環(huán)保法庭建設(shè)中的方面的成功做法和經(jīng)驗(yàn),特別是在處理跨區(qū)域環(huán)境糾紛、應(yīng)對(duì)環(huán)境案件的專業(yè)性和借用較高級(jí)別的法院審級(jí)的優(yōu)秀啟示,最終提出適合我國(guó)環(huán)保法庭建設(shè)的構(gòu)想。
[Abstract]:With the steady improvement of industrialization in our country, the rapid development of economy and the contradiction between resources and environment are becoming increasingly sharp. As the number of environmental cases is also increasing, the awareness of environmental protection between the government and the public is gradually strengthened. To deal with the soaring environmental cases effectively has become an urgent problem in the field of environmental justice in China. At present, our governments at all levels have set up different forms of environmental protection institutions, which have played a great role in the handling of environmental disputes, but, There are many disadvantages in relying solely on the environmental protection department to deal with the increasing number of environmental cases. In order to more effectively enforce the national environmental protection laws and regulations, and give play to the special role of legal means in environmental protection. While the criminal court and the administrative court are becoming more and more perfect, it is urgent to establish an environmental protection court for the purpose of environmental protection. This paper holds that in addition to further strengthening environmental law enforcement in our country, It is also necessary to consider setting up a new judicial body, the Environmental Protection trial Chamber, in people's courts at all levels. Many domestic scholars have attached great importance to the construction of environmental protection courts. This paper analyzes the current situation of the operation of environmental courts and puts forward some constructive suggestions. However, whether the results are widely verified and operable in a wider scope remains to be further tested in practice. Based on the case of environmental infringement in Zijin Mining Co., Ltd., this paper summarizes the current situation of setting up and running of domestic environmental protection court. The problems and reasons in the establishment and operation of environmental courts are summarized, and the successful practices and experiences of western countries in the construction of environmental protection courts are used for reference, especially in dealing with cross-regional environmental disputes. To deal with the professional nature of environmental cases and to borrow the excellent enlightenment of the higher level courts, the author finally puts forward the idea of building the environmental protection courts in our country.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西安建筑科技大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號(hào)】：D922.68;D926.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 許文澤;;對(duì)司法獨(dú)立的再思考[J];重慶科技學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2008年06期

2 肯尼士.F.麥克卡林;H.瑞加.沙瑪;馬福威;張?jiān)妭?;環(huán)境司法無(wú)國(guó)界:建立國(guó)際環(huán)境法院,保護(hù)基本環(huán)境權(quán)利的必要性[J];研究生法學(xué);2002年01期

3 代吉林;我國(guó)的自然資源產(chǎn)權(quán)、政府行為與制度演進(jìn)[J];當(dāng)代財(cái)經(jīng);2004年07期

4 齊樹(shù)潔,鄭賢宇;我國(guó)公益訴訟的困境與出路[J];中國(guó)司法;2005年03期

5 王小鋼;;近25年來(lái)的中國(guó)公民環(huán)境權(quán)理論述評(píng)[J];中國(guó)地質(zhì)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2007年04期

6 謝暉;獨(dú)立的司法與可訴的法[J];法律科學(xué).西北政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);1999年01期

7 孫茜;;對(duì)設(shè)立環(huán)保法庭的幾點(diǎn)法律思考——以貴陽(yáng)市環(huán)保法庭為考察對(duì)象[J];法律適用;2008年06期

8 王蓉,張璐,陳賽;創(chuàng)新環(huán)境資源法學(xué) 共建綠色新千年——中國(guó)法學(xué)會(huì)環(huán)境資源法研究會(huì)2000年年會(huì)綜述[J];法學(xué)評(píng)論;2001年03期

9 黃莎;李廣兵;;環(huán)保法庭的合法性和正當(dāng)性論證——兼與劉超博士商榷[J];法學(xué)評(píng)論;2010年05期

10 徐子良;;地方法院在司法改革中的能動(dòng)性思考——兼論區(qū)域司法環(huán)境軟實(shí)力之提升[J];法學(xué);2010年04期

，

本文編號(hào)：1565748