本文關(guān)鍵詞： 環(huán)境糾紛 法律制度 自力救濟(jì) 行政處理　出處：《西安建筑科技大學(xué)》2009年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】： 隨著我國(guó)環(huán)境問(wèn)題日益凸顯及公民環(huán)境意識(shí)的不斷提高,環(huán)境民事糾紛日益增多,如果這些糾紛不能得到及時(shí)有效解決,還會(huì)引發(fā)諸多社會(huì)問(wèn)題。據(jù)原國(guó)家環(huán)�？偩�2006年的一個(gè)報(bào)告稱,在過(guò)去的10年間,全國(guó)因環(huán)境問(wèn)題引發(fā)的群體性事件上升11.6倍,年均遞增28.8%。我國(guó)目前解決環(huán)境糾紛的法律制度雖然提供了包括司法救濟(jì)、行政處理、自力救濟(jì)等多種方式在內(nèi)的解決途徑,但是對(duì)解決環(huán)境糾紛卻顯得力不從心。根據(jù)亞里士多德的法治即“已成立的法律獲得普遍的遵從,而大家所服從的法律又應(yīng)該本身是制定得良好的法律”的觀點(diǎn),一方面,我國(guó)現(xiàn)行的法律制度本身可能存在問(wèn)題;另一方面,該法律制度可能并沒(méi)有獲得民眾普遍的遵從。本文正是從這兩個(gè)方面入手,試圖對(duì)法律制度本身及其實(shí)施的過(guò)程進(jìn)行分析,以期對(duì)上述兩個(gè)問(wèn)題作出解答,同時(shí)進(jìn)一步探討完善的對(duì)策。 本文首先對(duì)我國(guó)現(xiàn)行解決環(huán)境糾紛的法律制度從靜態(tài)到動(dòng)態(tài)兩方面進(jìn)行考察。靜態(tài)考察方面,分別按照司法救濟(jì)、行政處理和自力救濟(jì)三種不同解決方式進(jìn)行分類和梳理,以對(duì)環(huán)境糾紛法律制度的全貌有一個(gè)基本了解;動(dòng)態(tài)考察方面,在對(duì)十六個(gè)典型環(huán)境案例進(jìn)行對(duì)比、分類、整理的基礎(chǔ)上,總結(jié)并分析在上述法律制度及其實(shí)施過(guò)程中存在的普遍性和典型性的問(wèn)題;在對(duì)前述問(wèn)題的成因進(jìn)行分析后,本文試圖從法律制度本身和相關(guān)配套機(jī)制建設(shè)兩方面入手,分別提出完善的建議。 本文采用案例分析、實(shí)證分析的方法,不僅關(guān)注靜態(tài)的法律制度本身,還將更多的筆墨著重于分析該制度在實(shí)施過(guò)程中出現(xiàn)的問(wèn)題以及對(duì)應(yīng)的解決方式,不是就制度而論制度,而是通過(guò)現(xiàn)實(shí)中的具體案例反映制度實(shí)施中存在的問(wèn)題,因?yàn)橄啾扔诜芍贫缺旧?更重要的是它在實(shí)踐中是否得到遵從。
[Abstract]:With the increasingly prominent environmental problems in China and the continuous improvement of citizens' environmental awareness, environmental civil disputes are increasing, if these disputes can not be resolved in a timely and effective manner. There are also social problems. In the past 10 years, the number of environmental incidents has risen by 11.6-fold, according to a report by the State Environmental Protection Administration on 2006. China's current environmental dispute settlement legal system provides a variety of solutions including judicial relief, administrative treatment, self-relief and other ways. However, it is not enough to solve environmental disputes. According to Aristotle's rule of law, "established law is generally respected." On the one hand, the existing legal system of our country may have problems; On the other hand, the legal system may not have been generally followed by the public. This paper tries to analyze the legal system itself and its implementation process from these two aspects. In order to answer the above two questions, at the same time further explore the perfect countermeasures. In this paper, the current legal system for resolving environmental disputes in China from static to dynamic aspects of the investigation. Static investigation, respectively according to the judicial relief. In order to have a basic understanding of the legal system of environmental disputes, administrative treatment and self-relief are classified and sorted out. In the aspect of dynamic investigation, on the basis of comparing, classifying and arranging sixteen typical environmental cases, this paper summarizes and analyzes the problems of universality and typicality existing in the above mentioned legal system and its implementation process. After analyzing the causes of the above problems, this paper tries to put forward some perfect suggestions from two aspects: the legal system itself and the related supporting mechanism construction. This paper uses the method of case analysis, empirical analysis, not only pay attention to the static legal system itself, but also focus on the analysis of the system in the implementation of the problems and corresponding solutions. Not in terms of institution, but through concrete cases in reality to reflect the problems existing in the implementation of the system, because compared with the legal system itself, the more important thing is whether it is complied with in practice.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西安建筑科技大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2009
【分類號(hào)】：D922.68

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前5條

1 陳瑞華;;通過(guò)法律實(shí)現(xiàn)程序正義——薩默斯“程序價(jià)值”理論評(píng)析[J];北大法律評(píng)論;1998年01期

2 季衛(wèi)東;;法律程序的形式性與實(shí)質(zhì)性——以對(duì)程序理論的批判和批判理論的程序化為線索[J];北京大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2006年01期

3 呂忠梅;;環(huán)境友好型社會(huì)中的環(huán)境糾紛解決機(jī)制論綱[J];中國(guó)地質(zhì)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2008年03期

4 童志鋒;黃家亮;;通過(guò)法律的環(huán)境治理:“雙重困境”與“雙管齊下”[J];湖南社會(huì)科學(xué);2008年03期

5 張梓太;中國(guó)環(huán)境行政訴訟之困境與對(duì)策分析[J];法學(xué)評(píng)論;2003年05期

，

本文編號(hào)：1464801