【摘要】：隨著我國市場經(jīng)濟(jì)的深入發(fā)展,為便于結(jié)算及保證債權(quán)有效得以實(shí)現(xiàn),交易主體常將自己的債務(wù)全部或部分轉(zhuǎn)移給第三人,與經(jīng)濟(jì)領(lǐng)域相呼應(yīng)的是,在司法實(shí)務(wù)中涉及債務(wù)承擔(dān)的案件層出不窮,但目前我國的債務(wù)承擔(dān)制度還存在許多問題。首先,在我國的法律文獻(xiàn)中深入討論債務(wù)承擔(dān)的理論相對較少,且大部分理論對債務(wù)承擔(dān)制度僅作了原則性的闡述,沒有從實(shí)務(wù)角度進(jìn)行深入分析。其次,就我國目前的立法情況而言,雖然在《民法通則》和《合同法》中均對合同義務(wù)的轉(zhuǎn)移作出了規(guī)定,但我國目前關(guān)于債務(wù)承擔(dān)的相關(guān)立法還不夠完善。最后,雖然在司法實(shí)務(wù)中涉及債務(wù)承擔(dān)的案例比比皆是,但因我國關(guān)于債務(wù)承擔(dān)的理論還不夠成熟,相關(guān)法律規(guī)定較為籠統(tǒng)以及債務(wù)承擔(dān)本身所涉及關(guān)系的復(fù)雜性,各級法院在債務(wù)承擔(dān)性質(zhì)認(rèn)定方面存在模糊點(diǎn),法官有很大的自由裁量權(quán),相類似案件作出不同判決的現(xiàn)象屢見不鮮�；谏鲜鲈�,筆者認(rèn)為針對債務(wù)承擔(dān)問題進(jìn)行實(shí)務(wù)方面研究是很有必要的。本文以相關(guān)案例為基礎(chǔ)對債務(wù)承擔(dān)制度進(jìn)行論述,共分為五部分。第一部分筆者將分析我國債務(wù)承擔(dān)案件司法審判現(xiàn)狀及其存在的問題;第二部分是關(guān)于債務(wù)承擔(dān)成立的司法判斷問題;第三部分通過引入具體案例論述免責(zé)債務(wù)承擔(dān)與并存?zhèn)鶆?wù)承擔(dān)的性質(zhì)認(rèn)定問題;第四部分和第五部分涉及到債務(wù)承擔(dān)與其相似制度的甄別問題。本文采取債務(wù)承擔(dān)理論與具體實(shí)務(wù)案例相結(jié)合的方法進(jìn)行研究,是為了進(jìn)一步明確債務(wù)承擔(dān)理論如何在司法實(shí)踐中得以運(yùn)用的問題,以求對司法實(shí)務(wù)有所幫助。
[Abstract]:With the in-depth development of the market economy in China, in order to facilitate the settlement and guarantee the effective realization of creditor's rights, transaction subjects often transfer their debts to third parties in whole or in part, which corresponds to the economic field. There are a lot of cases involving debt burden in judicial practice, but there are still many problems in the debt bearing system of our country. First of all, there are relatively few in-depth discussions on debt commitment in the legal literature of our country, and most of the theories have only made a principled exposition of the debt undertaking system, but have not carried on the in-depth analysis from the practical angle. Secondly, as far as the current legislation of our country is concerned, although the transfer of contractual obligations has been stipulated in the General principles of Civil Law and the contract Law, the relevant legislation on debt commitment in our country is not perfect at present. Finally, although there are numerous cases involving debt commitment in judicial practice, because the theory of debt commitment in our country is not mature enough, the relevant legal provisions are more general and the complexity of the relationship involved in debt undertaking itself, The courts at all levels have a vague point in determining the nature of debt commitment, judges have a great discretion, similar cases to make different judgments are common phenomena. Based on the above reasons, the author believes that it is necessary to study the practical aspects of debt commitment. Based on the relevant cases, this paper discusses the debt-bearing system, which is divided into five parts. In the first part, the author will analyze the current situation of judicial trial in debt-bearing cases in China and its existing problems, and the second part is about the judicial judgment of the establishment of debt-bearing cases. The third part discusses the nature of liability exemption and co-existing debt by introducing specific cases, and the fourth and fifth part deals with the discrimination of the similar system of debt commitment. The purpose of this paper is to further clarify the problem of how to use the debt-bearing theory in judicial practice in order to help judicial practice by combining the debt-bearing theory with the concrete practical cases in order to further clarify the issue of how the debt-bearing theory can be used in judicial practice.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：內(nèi)蒙古大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D923

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 張銑;;并存的債務(wù)承擔(dān)若干問題研究[J];特區(qū)經(jīng)濟(jì);2008年11期

2 蒲朝琦;;探析并存的債務(wù)承擔(dān)制度[J];知識經(jīng)濟(jì);2013年04期

3 戴紅兵,陳發(fā)桂;債務(wù)承擔(dān)新探[J];廣西政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2001年04期

4 王建文;論死者生前債務(wù)承擔(dān)[J];南京化工大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2001年02期

5 胡健;;論免責(zé)債務(wù)承擔(dān)的構(gòu)成要件及法律效果[J];當(dāng)代經(jīng)理人;2005年03期

6 魯建法;一起借款糾紛案的剖析——企業(yè)改制過程中的債務(wù)承擔(dān)問題[J];西部論叢;2005年03期

7 張穎杰;萬良杰;;國企出售與債務(wù)承擔(dān)問題探討[J];商業(yè)時(shí)代;2007年03期

8 石濤鋒;尹曉健;;債務(wù)承擔(dān)若干法律問題研究及風(fēng)險(xiǎn)防范[J];河北金融;2007年08期

9 張振;;債務(wù)承擔(dān)的性質(zhì)認(rèn)定問題研究[J];濰坊學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2008年05期

10 張文青;;并存?zhèn)鶆?wù)承擔(dān)的理論與實(shí)踐研究[J];東南大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2009年S1期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前10條

1 無錫市北塘區(qū)人民法院 高鑫;債務(wù)承擔(dān)若干法律問題研究[N];商務(wù)時(shí)報(bào);2008年

2 張秋婷　肖s，

本文編號：2437720