【摘要】：我國《合同法》第73條規(guī)定了代位權制度,《最高人民法院關于適用中華人民共和國合同法若干問題的解釋(一)》對于這一制度做出了更加具體的規(guī)定。債權人的代位權訴訟,要求比普通的民事訴訟嚴格很多,除了具備一般的起訴條件,還要具備其自身的特殊條件,因為其突破了傳統(tǒng)民法理論中的債權的相對性,當事人和當事人之間法律關系也較為復雜。對于代位權的適用,存在"優(yōu)先受償規(guī)則"與"入庫規(guī)則"之爭。
[Abstract]:Article 73 of the contract Law of our country stipulates the system of subrogation. The interpretation of the Supreme people's Court on some issues concerning the Application of the contract Law of the people's Republic of China makes more specific provisions on this system. The subrogation litigation of creditors is much stricter than that of ordinary civil litigation. In addition to the general conditions for prosecution, it also has its own special conditions, because it breaks through the relativity of creditor's rights in the traditional civil law theory. The legal relationship between the parties and the parties is also more complex. For the application of the right of subrogation, there is a dispute between "priority compensation rule" and "storage rule".
【作者單位】： 中央民族大學法學院;
【分類號】：D923.6

【共引文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 范婷婷;;略論代位權行使的效力[J];安徽大學法律評論;2010年01期

2 韓銀蘭,杜曉智;債權平等原則在代位權理論中的重釋[J];北京科技大學學報(社會科學版);2005年03期

3 巴金;;傳統(tǒng)代位權理論的突破與創(chuàng)新——從“入庫規(guī)則”到“優(yōu)先受償”[J];研究生法學;2005年01期

4 王碩;;論債權人代位權制度[J];福建法學;2011年03期

5 趙許明;論我國代位權制度及其發(fā)展走向[J];福建政法管理干部學院學報;2004年01期

6 李h，

本文編號：2435538