【摘要】：隨著社會(huì)的發(fā)展,集體合同制度的作用也正在逐步凸顯。作為協(xié)商勞動(dòng)關(guān)系的一項(xiàng)重要法律制度,集體合同上承勞動(dòng)基準(zhǔn)法,下啟勞動(dòng)合同的訂立,指導(dǎo)和制約勞動(dòng)合同的訂立和履行。西方主要發(fā)達(dá)國(guó)家根據(jù)本國(guó)的實(shí)際對(duì)于集體合同的效力有著不同的規(guī)定,而我國(guó)則立法賦予工會(huì)來(lái)代表全體職工和用人單位簽訂集體合同。但是由于我國(guó)《勞動(dòng)法》和《勞動(dòng)合同法》對(duì)集體合同責(zé)任的承擔(dān)均未作出明確的規(guī)定,再加上現(xiàn)實(shí)當(dāng)中,勞資雙方容易混淆一般勞動(dòng)合同與集體合同之間的關(guān)系,導(dǎo)致目前的實(shí)踐當(dāng)中糾紛不斷。 本文以目前集體合同實(shí)踐當(dāng)中存在的問(wèn)題為主線,然后對(duì)于其存在的問(wèn)題進(jìn)行深入的分析,深入分析其存在問(wèn)題的原因,然后借鑒國(guó)外的立法經(jīng)驗(yàn),提出解決糾紛的相關(guān)建議。
[Abstract]:With the development of society, the role of collective contract system is gradually prominent. As an important legal system for negotiation of labor relations, the collective contract carries on the labor standard law, the conclusion of the lower labor contract, the guidance and restriction of the conclusion and performance of the labor contract. The main developed countries in the West have different regulations on the effectiveness of collective contracts according to their actual conditions, while our country has legislated to give trade unions the power to sign collective contracts on behalf of all workers and employers. However, since neither the Labor Law nor the Labor contract Law of our country has made clear provisions on the responsibility of collective contracts, in addition, in reality, both employers and employees tend to confuse the relationship between general labor contracts and collective contracts. Causes the present practice in the dispute unceasingly. This article takes the existing problems in the practice of collective contract as the main line, then analyzes the existing problems deeply, analyzes the causes of the problems, and then draws lessons from the foreign legislative experience, and puts forward the relevant suggestions to resolve the disputes.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：中南大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D922.5

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 董保華;;錦上添花抑或雪中送炭——析《中華人民共和國(guó)勞動(dòng)合同法(草案)》的基本定位[J];法商研究;2006年03期

2 王全興;集體合同論綱[J];法商研究(中南政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào));1995年04期

3 關(guān)懷;;《勞動(dòng)合同法》與勞動(dòng)者合法權(quán)益的保護(hù)[J];法學(xué)雜志;2006年05期

4 章成;;淺析《勞動(dòng)合同法》下的事實(shí)勞動(dòng)關(guān)系法律效力的認(rèn)定[J];法制與社會(huì);2010年19期

5 任新民;羅剛;;試論事實(shí)勞動(dòng)關(guān)系的界定與期限[J];貴州工業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2008年01期

6 邱寧;;論集體合同的制度框架及其實(shí)施[J];改革與戰(zhàn)略;2009年06期

7 楊冬梅;;關(guān)于集體合同履行若干問(wèn)題的研究[J];中國(guó)勞動(dòng)關(guān)系學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2006年01期

8 張舉國(guó);;我國(guó)集體合同制度的法律思考[J];湖北成人教育學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2009年01期

9 李凌云;;對(duì)我國(guó)事實(shí)勞動(dòng)關(guān)系立法的反思[J];華東政法大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2008年06期

10 馬躍如;馬馳升;;法理學(xué)視角下的非標(biāo)準(zhǔn)勞動(dòng)關(guān)系規(guī)制分析[J];哈爾濱學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2011年05期

，

本文編號(hào)：2367284