商業(yè)銀行委托貸款業(yè)務(wù)法律問題研究
[Abstract]:In recent years, the entrusted loan business of commercial banks has developed rapidly, which provides a good way for the effective use of social idle funds. The commercial bank, as the trustee, shall not bear any risks and responsibilities. The commercial bank shall issue the loan funds in accordance with the requirements of the entrusting party, supervise the use of the loan funds and assist in the recovery of the loan funds, and may also charge a certain proportion of the handling fees as agreed. All loan risks are borne by the principal who provides the loan funds. However, due to the imperfect laws and regulations on entrusted loan business in our country, there are a lot of problems in judicial practice, which is not conducive to the healthy and orderly development of entrusted loan business of commercial banks. The content of this paper is divided into three parts: the first part of this paper gives a basic definition of the entrusted loan business of commercial banks, introduces the concept and classification of entrusted loan business, and compares the related concepts with self-financing and trust loan. On the basis of the analysis of the legal nature of the entrusted loan business is an indirect agency relationship, the author further clarifies the rights and obligations of the parties in the entrusted loan business. The significance of the development of entrusted loan business in commercial banks is clarified. The second part of this paper expounds the legislative status and existing problems of entrustment loan business of commercial banks in China. This part first lists the relevant legal provisions of the entrusted loan business of commercial banks, including the contract Law, the Commercial Bank Law, the judicial interpretation and the relevant legal provisions in the departmental rules and regulations. On this basis, the author analyzes the legal problems existing in the entrusted loan business from five aspects. They are the unclear distribution of the borrower's responsibility for failing to return principal and interest, and the lack of guarantee provisions in the entrusted loan business. The laws and regulations of collective entrustment loan business are not perfect, the internal control mechanism of commercial banks is not perfect, and the supervision and regulation of entrusted loans are not perfect. The third part of this paper combines the legal problems in the practice of entrustment loan business of commercial banks in our country, and puts forward corresponding countermeasures and suggestions. The specific suggestions are as follows: in view of the unclear distribution of the borrower's responsibility for failing to return principal and interest in due time, the author thinks that the subject and scope of liability can be determined from the two situations of the trustee's claim of creditor's rights and non-claim of creditor's rights; With regard to the validity of the contract signed between the entrusted loan enterprise and the guarantor, the validity of the guarantee contract can be determined under the circumstances of the tripartite agreement and the absence of an agreement, and the problem of the fiduciary commercial bank not actively asserting its rights in the security contract, The principal may exercise the right of intervention to protect his legitimate rights and interests; From strict setting the borrower's condition, standardizing the business operation and establishing the product flow mechanism to perfect the collective entrustment loan business; Through strengthening compliance examination, prohibiting advance payment of funds and perfecting internal liability investigation system, the internal control of entrusted loan business of commercial banks should be improved. The external supervision of entrusted loan business of commercial banks is improved from three aspects: unifying supervision standard, perfecting supervision means and standardizing information disclosure.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:遼寧大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2012
【分類號】:D922.28;F832.4
【參考文獻】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 彭純,胡月曉;解析委托貸款的契約安排[J];重慶大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2005年02期
2 魏仕光;;商業(yè)銀行委托貸款業(yè)務(wù)及風(fēng)險防范[J];福建金融;2009年05期
3 江茜;;間接代理介入制度芻議[J];法制與社會;2011年22期
4 張學(xué)文;委托貸款及其法律責(zé)任探究[J];河北法學(xué);1998年06期
5 江賽民;苗文;;委托貸款中債權(quán)人認定探討[J];金融理論與實踐;2010年11期
6 王曦;趙旭宏;;委托貸款業(yè)務(wù)的應(yīng)用及風(fēng)險防范[J];農(nóng)業(yè)發(fā)展與金融;2006年11期
7 張蓉;商業(yè)銀行集合委托貸款現(xiàn)實分析與管理建議[J];西南金融;2005年08期
8 高旺東;多方委托貸款的現(xiàn)實分析與管理建議[J];濟南金融;2003年09期
9 吳向紅;委托貸款之法律關(guān)系的實證分析[J];西北第二民族學(xué)院學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);1999年04期
10 龍翼飛;楊建文;;企業(yè)間借貸合同的效力認定及責(zé)任承擔(dān)[J];現(xiàn)代法學(xué);2008年02期
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條
1 張滿華;城市基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施融資新方式——集合委托貸款研究[D];中南大學(xué);2003年
2 毛秋芳;我國委托貸款法律問題研究[D];湖南師范大學(xué);2010年
,本文編號:2366509
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/hetongqiyue/2366509.html