侵權(quán)責(zé)任與違約責(zé)任之競合:《合同法》第122條質(zhì)疑
發(fā)布時(shí)間:2018-11-13 08:25
【摘要】:正 合同當(dāng)事人之間發(fā)生的違約行為同時(shí)構(gòu)成侵權(quán)行為時(shí),合同違約方應(yīng)承擔(dān)違約責(zé)任,同時(shí)作為加害人又應(yīng)承擔(dān)侵權(quán)責(zé)任,這就發(fā)生了責(zé)任競合的問題。此時(shí),當(dāng)事人應(yīng)當(dāng)主張哪種責(zé)任呢?我國《合同法》第122條規(guī)定:因當(dāng)事人一方的違約行為,侵害對方人身、財(cái)產(chǎn)權(quán)益的,受損害方有權(quán)選擇依照本法要求
[Abstract]:When the breach of contract between the parties to the contract constitutes an act of infringement, the party in breach of contract should bear the liability for breach of contract, and at the same time, as the perpetrator of the contract, it should bear the liability of infringement, which leads to the problem of the concurrence of the responsibilities. At this point, what kind of responsibility should the parties claim? Article 122 of the contract Law of China stipulates that if a party infringes upon the other party's personal and property rights and interests as a result of a breach of contract by a party, the aggrieved party shall have the right to choose to meet the requirements of this Law.
【作者單位】: 山東警察學(xué)院法律部 濟(jì)南市槐蔭區(qū)人民法院
【分類號】:D923.6
[Abstract]:When the breach of contract between the parties to the contract constitutes an act of infringement, the party in breach of contract should bear the liability for breach of contract, and at the same time, as the perpetrator of the contract, it should bear the liability of infringement, which leads to the problem of the concurrence of the responsibilities. At this point, what kind of responsibility should the parties claim? Article 122 of the contract Law of China stipulates that if a party infringes upon the other party's personal and property rights and interests as a result of a breach of contract by a party, the aggrieved party shall have the right to choose to meet the requirements of this Law.
【作者單位】: 山東警察學(xué)院法律部 濟(jì)南市槐蔭區(qū)人民法院
【分類號】:D923.6
【相似文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 王玉霞;;網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)提供者侵犯版權(quán)責(zé)任問題研究——以百度文庫為視角[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)視角(中旬);2011年05期
2 李燕;;論醫(yī)院內(nèi)感染之民事責(zé)任[J];法學(xué)雜志;2011年06期
3 胡琴;;論違約責(zé)任與侵權(quán)責(zé)任的競合[J];新課程(教育學(xué)術(shù));2011年07期
4 劉哲;;無意思聯(lián)絡(luò)數(shù)人侵權(quán)行為研究[J];法制與社會;2011年23期
5 萬金店;;學(xué)術(shù)作品中合作作者侵權(quán)責(zé)任認(rèn)定研究[J];前沿;2011年13期
6 伍鑒萍;;對我國離婚損害賠償制度存在問題的思考[J];延邊黨校學(xué)報(bào);2011年04期
7 王愛霞;王鴻信;;數(shù)字圖書館用戶侵權(quán)責(zé)任歸責(zé)原則的修正與重新界定[J];中州學(xué)刊;2011年04期
8 王林麗;;從百度文庫糾紛談網(wǎng)絡(luò)傳播權(quán)的保護(hù)問題[J];才智;2011年18期
9 李雨o,
本文編號:2328551
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/hetongqiyue/2328551.html
最近更新
教材專著