兩種安全準(zhǔn)則視域下的網(wǎng)絡(luò)安全防衛(wèi)權(quán)
發(fā)布時(shí)間:2019-08-08 17:31
【摘要】:《聯(lián)合國憲章》明確規(guī)定了國家自衛(wèi)權(quán)的適用條件,但在實(shí)踐中,美國等西方強(qiáng)國對(duì)此并未嚴(yán)格遵守。由此在網(wǎng)絡(luò)空間中出現(xiàn)了兩種不同的安全準(zhǔn)則:一是以美國為首的北約國家在《塔林手冊(cè)》中提出對(duì)于所謂網(wǎng)絡(luò)攻擊威脅可以動(dòng)用網(wǎng)絡(luò)安全防衛(wèi)權(quán);另一是以中俄為代表的國家提出禁止網(wǎng)絡(luò)攻擊,堅(jiān)決反對(duì)先發(fā)制人、預(yù)先防衛(wèi)。由于美國在網(wǎng)絡(luò)空間占有極強(qiáng)的技術(shù)優(yōu)勢(shì),我國必須推動(dòng)構(gòu)建各層次的網(wǎng)絡(luò)空間行為公約,提高網(wǎng)絡(luò)空間預(yù)警和自衛(wèi)能力,加強(qiáng)交流、增進(jìn)互信以有效維護(hù)國家網(wǎng)絡(luò)空間安全。
[Abstract]:The Charter of the United Nations clearly stipulates the applicable conditions of the right of national self-defense, but in practice, the United States and other western powers have not strictly complied with this. As a result, there are two different security norms in cyberspace: one is that NATO countries led by the United States propose in the Tallinn Manual that they can use the right of cyber security to defend against so-called cyber attack threats; the other is that countries represented by China and Russia propose to ban cyber attacks and resolutely oppose pre-emptive and pre-defense. Because the United States has a strong technical advantage in cyberspace, China must promote the construction of conventions on cyberspace behavior at all levels, improve the early warning and self-defense ability of cyberspace, strengthen exchanges, and enhance mutual trust in order to effectively maintain the security of national cyberspace.
【作者單位】: 國防科技大學(xué)人文與社會(huì)科學(xué)學(xué)院;
【分類號(hào)】:D99
[Abstract]:The Charter of the United Nations clearly stipulates the applicable conditions of the right of national self-defense, but in practice, the United States and other western powers have not strictly complied with this. As a result, there are two different security norms in cyberspace: one is that NATO countries led by the United States propose in the Tallinn Manual that they can use the right of cyber security to defend against so-called cyber attack threats; the other is that countries represented by China and Russia propose to ban cyber attacks and resolutely oppose pre-emptive and pre-defense. Because the United States has a strong technical advantage in cyberspace, China must promote the construction of conventions on cyberspace behavior at all levels, improve the early warning and self-defense ability of cyberspace, strengthen exchanges, and enhance mutual trust in order to effectively maintain the security of national cyberspace.
【作者單位】: 國防科技大學(xué)人文與社會(huì)科學(xué)學(xué)院;
【分類號(hào)】:D99
【相似文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 韓治國;關(guān)于特別防衛(wèi)權(quán)的思考[J];河北法學(xué);2002年01期
2 郭建坡;對(duì)新刑法設(shè)立無限防衛(wèi)權(quán)的理性思考[J];河北法學(xué);2002年05期
3 李成福;論無限防衛(wèi)權(quán)[J];四川警官高等?茖W(xué)校學(xué)報(bào);2003年04期
4 崔靜;對(duì)“無限防衛(wèi)權(quán)”的理性思考[J];白城師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2005年02期
5 郭冰;;警察防衛(wèi)權(quán)之思辨[J];中國人民公安大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2006年01期
6 王國飛;;對(duì)特別防衛(wèi)權(quán)的理性思考[J];科教文匯(上半月);2006年11期
7 李曉歐;;特殊防衛(wèi)權(quán)若干問題探析[J];長春師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2007年03期
8 常菲;;警察職務(wù)防衛(wèi)權(quán)行使的正當(dāng)性要素及原則[J];河南司法警官職業(yè)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2007年02期
9 周U喓,
本文編號(hào):2524502
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/guojifa/2524502.html
最近更新
教材專著