論ICSID管轄權(quán)制度的變化趨勢(shì)
發(fā)布時(shí)間：2019-06-21 00:29
【摘要】：在國(guó)際投資領(lǐng)域特別是在私人國(guó)際投資領(lǐng)域,投資者與東道國(guó)之間因?yàn)橥顿Y而產(chǎn)生的各種爭(zhēng)端時(shí)有發(fā)生,這些爭(zhēng)端是否能得到及時(shí)、公正的解決,不但會(huì)影響投資者的直接利益,若處理不當(dāng)還可能會(huì)影響到投資者母國(guó)與東道國(guó)之間的經(jīng)濟(jì)關(guān)系。為了能夠及時(shí)、公正地解決私人國(guó)際投資爭(zhēng)端,世界銀行曾在上個(gè)世紀(jì)六十年代制定了《華盛頓公約》,根據(jù)這個(gè)公約,創(chuàng)立了“解決投資爭(zhēng)端國(guó)際中心”,也就是"ICSID"。因此,私人投資者就可以通過(guò)國(guó)際仲裁或調(diào)解程序解決其與東道國(guó)的投資爭(zhēng)端。雖然之后國(guó)際上又出現(xiàn)了一些其他的國(guó)際投資爭(zhēng)端解決機(jī)制,但大都是在ICSID確定的框架內(nèi),加入一些國(guó)際上有關(guān)國(guó)際投資與保護(hù)的新觀點(diǎn)。因此,進(jìn)一步加深對(duì)ICSID管轄權(quán)制度的研究是符合我國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展趨勢(shì)的,對(duì)促進(jìn)提高我國(guó)在國(guó)際經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展中的地位和影響大有裨益。 根據(jù)對(duì)ICSID管轄權(quán)制度的闡述分析,結(jié)合國(guó)際經(jīng)濟(jì)社會(huì)的發(fā)展變化和我國(guó)的實(shí)際情況,并結(jié)合國(guó)際投資爭(zhēng)端解決機(jī)制的最新發(fā)展,對(duì)ICSID管轄權(quán)制度的具體變化進(jìn)行深入的分析,文章主要運(yùn)用歷史分析法和比較分析法,通過(guò)對(duì)ICSID管轄權(quán)問(wèn)題的研究,使我們更清楚地了解和明確《華盛頓公約》及相關(guān)規(guī)則對(duì)ICSID管轄權(quán)的規(guī)定,以及它的變化,尤其是ICSID在裁斷投資案例時(shí)的態(tài)度及傾向,使我國(guó)在簽訂投資協(xié)定時(shí)有所借鑒。 全文共分五個(gè)部分：第一部分是對(duì)ICSID的歷史沿革進(jìn)行全面的詳細(xì)的論述分析,這部分包括兩大內(nèi)容：一是產(chǎn)生的歷史背景的闡明；二是管轄權(quán)的主要內(nèi)容的理論；第二部分是對(duì)ICSID管轄權(quán)主體要件變化趨勢(shì)的探討,對(duì)ICSID管轄權(quán)主體要件的變化趨勢(shì)加以研究并進(jìn)行思考,并引發(fā)對(duì)國(guó)際法結(jié)構(gòu)的反思；第三部分,對(duì)ICSID管轄權(quán)客體要件的變化趨勢(shì)進(jìn)行了系統(tǒng)地論述；第四部分,對(duì)CSID管轄權(quán)的發(fā)展動(dòng)向和改善舉措做了較為深入地分析；第五部分,對(duì)ICSID管轄權(quán)的變化對(duì)中國(guó)的影響以及在ICSID管轄權(quán)擴(kuò)大化的新形式下我國(guó)所做的應(yīng)對(duì)措施作詳細(xì)的論述,借此維護(hù)我國(guó)在國(guó)際經(jīng)濟(jì)交往中的利益。 經(jīng)過(guò)深入的研究,得出以下結(jié)論：第一,從ICSID管轄權(quán)成立以來(lái),ICSID管轄權(quán)主體從嚴(yán)格限制走向?qū)捤伞５诙?《華盛頓公約》中未作出的“投資”定義范圍已經(jīng)發(fā)生了潛移默化的擴(kuò)大。第三,ICSID管轄權(quán)的改革需要穩(wěn)步推進(jìn),面對(duì)ICSID管轄權(quán)問(wèn)題,要有所進(jìn)退。對(duì)于爭(zhēng)議是否應(yīng)該交付ICSID解決,這個(gè)問(wèn)題應(yīng)該區(qū)別對(duì)待,需要在實(shí)際的模式當(dāng)中進(jìn)行總結(jié)。但是,我們應(yīng)該清楚地認(rèn)識(shí)到,一些爭(zhēng)議不應(yīng)該納入中心管轄范圍：比如對(duì)我國(guó)法律法規(guī)適用引起的爭(zhēng)議等。。其中關(guān)于ICSID管轄權(quán)主體、客體變化趨勢(shì)的研究是本課題的一大亮點(diǎn),此外在ICSID管轄權(quán)改善舉措上的探索也是本文的創(chuàng)新之處,通過(guò)對(duì)ICSID管轄權(quán)變化趨勢(shì)的研究,能促進(jìn)更為合理的國(guó)際投資制度的建設(shè)。
[Abstract]:In the field of international investment, especially in the field of private international investment, various disputes between investors and host countries arising from investment occur from time to time. Whether these disputes can be settled in a timely and just manner will not only affect the direct interests of investors, but also affect the economic relations between the home country of investors and the host country if handled improperly. In order to resolve private international investment disputes in a timely and just manner, the World Bank formulated the Washington Convention in the 1960s, according to which the International Center for the settlement of Investment disputes, or ICSID, was created. As a result, private investors can resolve their investment disputes with host countries through international arbitration or mediation procedures. Although some other international investment dispute settlement mechanisms have emerged in the world since then, most of them have added some new international views on international investment and protection within the framework determined by ICSID. Therefore, further deepening the study of ICSID jurisdiction system is in line with the trend of economic development in China, and is of great benefit to the promotion and improvement of China's position and influence in the development of international economy. According to the exposition and analysis of ICSID jurisdiction system, combined with the development and change of international economy and society and the actual situation of our country, and combined with the latest development of international investment dispute settlement mechanism, this paper makes a deep analysis of the specific changes of ICSID jurisdiction system. This paper mainly uses historical analysis and comparative analysis to study the jurisdiction of ICSID. It makes us more clearly understand and clarify the provisions of the Washington Convention and related rules on the jurisdiction of ICSID, as well as its changes, especially the attitude and tendency of ICSID in determining investment cases, so that our country can draw lessons from the signing of investment agreements. The full text is divided into five parts: the first part is a comprehensive and detailed discussion and analysis of the historical evolution of ICSID, which includes two main contents: one is the clarification of the historical background; the other is the theory of the main content of jurisdiction; the second part is the discussion of the changing trend of the main elements of ICSID jurisdiction, the study and reflection on the changing trend of the main elements of ICSID jurisdiction, and the reflection on the structure of international law. The third part systematically discusses the changing trend of the object elements of ICSID jurisdiction; the fourth part makes a more in-depth analysis of the development trend and improvement measures of CSID jurisdiction; the fifth part discusses in detail the influence of the change of ICSID jurisdiction on China and the countermeasures made by China under the new form of the expansion of ICSID jurisdiction, so as to safeguard China's interests in international economic exchanges. After in-depth study, the following conclusions are drawn: first, since the establishment of ICSID jurisdiction, the subject of ICSID jurisdiction has changed from strict restriction to easing. Second, the scope of the definition of "investment" not made in the Washington Convention has been expanded imperceptibly. Third, the reform of ICSID jurisdiction needs to be steadily advanced, in the face of ICSID jurisdiction, we should advance and retreat. Whether the dispute should be delivered to ICSID for resolution should be treated differently and needs to be summarized in the actual model. However, we should clearly realize that some disputes should not be included in the central jurisdiction: for example, disputes arising from the application of laws and regulations in our country. Among them, the research on the changing trend of the subject and object of ICSID jurisdiction is a bright spot of this topic. In addition, the exploration on the improvement measures of ICSID jurisdiction is also the innovation of this paper. Through the study of the changing trend of ICSID jurisdiction, it can promote the construction of a more reasonable international investment system.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：湖南師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號(hào)】：D996
本文編號(hào)：2503644
[Abstract]:In the field of international investment, especially in the field of private international investment, various disputes between investors and host countries arising from investment occur from time to time. Whether these disputes can be settled in a timely and just manner will not only affect the direct interests of investors, but also affect the economic relations between the home country of investors and the host country if handled improperly. In order to resolve private international investment disputes in a timely and just manner, the World Bank formulated the Washington Convention in the 1960s, according to which the International Center for the settlement of Investment disputes, or ICSID, was created. As a result, private investors can resolve their investment disputes with host countries through international arbitration or mediation procedures. Although some other international investment dispute settlement mechanisms have emerged in the world since then, most of them have added some new international views on international investment and protection within the framework determined by ICSID. Therefore, further deepening the study of ICSID jurisdiction system is in line with the trend of economic development in China, and is of great benefit to the promotion and improvement of China's position and influence in the development of international economy. According to the exposition and analysis of ICSID jurisdiction system, combined with the development and change of international economy and society and the actual situation of our country, and combined with the latest development of international investment dispute settlement mechanism, this paper makes a deep analysis of the specific changes of ICSID jurisdiction system. This paper mainly uses historical analysis and comparative analysis to study the jurisdiction of ICSID. It makes us more clearly understand and clarify the provisions of the Washington Convention and related rules on the jurisdiction of ICSID, as well as its changes, especially the attitude and tendency of ICSID in determining investment cases, so that our country can draw lessons from the signing of investment agreements. The full text is divided into five parts: the first part is a comprehensive and detailed discussion and analysis of the historical evolution of ICSID, which includes two main contents: one is the clarification of the historical background; the other is the theory of the main content of jurisdiction; the second part is the discussion of the changing trend of the main elements of ICSID jurisdiction, the study and reflection on the changing trend of the main elements of ICSID jurisdiction, and the reflection on the structure of international law. The third part systematically discusses the changing trend of the object elements of ICSID jurisdiction; the fourth part makes a more in-depth analysis of the development trend and improvement measures of CSID jurisdiction; the fifth part discusses in detail the influence of the change of ICSID jurisdiction on China and the countermeasures made by China under the new form of the expansion of ICSID jurisdiction, so as to safeguard China's interests in international economic exchanges. After in-depth study, the following conclusions are drawn: first, since the establishment of ICSID jurisdiction, the subject of ICSID jurisdiction has changed from strict restriction to easing. Second, the scope of the definition of "investment" not made in the Washington Convention has been expanded imperceptibly. Third, the reform of ICSID jurisdiction needs to be steadily advanced, in the face of ICSID jurisdiction, we should advance and retreat. Whether the dispute should be delivered to ICSID for resolution should be treated differently and needs to be summarized in the actual model. However, we should clearly realize that some disputes should not be included in the central jurisdiction: for example, disputes arising from the application of laws and regulations in our country. Among them, the research on the changing trend of the subject and object of ICSID jurisdiction is a bright spot of this topic. In addition, the exploration on the improvement measures of ICSID jurisdiction is also the innovation of this paper. Through the study of the changing trend of ICSID jurisdiction, it can promote the construction of a more reasonable international investment system.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：湖南師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號(hào)】：D996
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前7條
1 魏艷茹;ICSID仲裁撤銷制度比較研究[J];商業(yè)研究;2004年23期
2 沈慧驊;國(guó)家和私人間投資爭(zhēng)端解決機(jī)制的沖突和協(xié)調(diào)——兼比較WTO與ICSID爭(zhēng)端解決機(jī)制的沖突和協(xié)調(diào)[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);2003年11期
3 徐崇利;全球化趨勢(shì)與“跨國(guó)法學(xué)”的興起[J];法商研究;2003年04期
4 余勁松;詹曉寧;;國(guó)際投資協(xié)定的近期發(fā)展及對(duì)中國(guó)的影響[J];法學(xué)家;2006年03期
5 李萬(wàn)強(qiáng);;ICSID管轄權(quán)行使的法律實(shí)踐與中國(guó)的對(duì)策[J];國(guó)際經(jīng)濟(jì)法論叢;2000年00期
6 衣淑玲;論國(guó)際投資中的國(guó)家責(zé)任問(wèn)題[J];甘肅政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2003年04期
7 張光;;中國(guó)利用ICSID國(guó)際仲裁機(jī)制的立法思考[J];廣西財(cái)經(jīng)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2006年02期
，本文編號(hào)：2503644
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/guojifa/2503644.html
最近更新
教材專著
