國(guó)際法視野下的知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)與人權(quán)
發(fā)布時(shí)間：2019-04-19 08:11
【摘要】：由發(fā)達(dá)國(guó)家主導(dǎo)的知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)基本上實(shí)現(xiàn)了全球化的目標(biāo)。知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)法律全球化的直接后果就是知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)與人權(quán)的沖突,尤其是《世界貿(mào)易組織與貿(mào)易有關(guān)的知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)協(xié)議》(以下簡(jiǎn)稱TRIPS協(xié)議)對(duì)人權(quán)構(gòu)成了直接沖擊,本文針對(duì)人權(quán)與知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)兩種權(quán)利范疇探討兩種國(guó)際體制(Regime),探討知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)法律全球化的演進(jìn),并描述全球化過程中知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)的權(quán)利擴(kuò)張圖景；以人權(quán)條約產(chǎn)生、發(fā)展和人權(quán)本身的演變軌跡考察全球化條件下人權(quán)的成長(zhǎng)情況。分析兩種權(quán)利在全球化條件下沖突與并存的情況,通過對(duì)國(guó)際條約的文本分析、倫理分析以及經(jīng)濟(jì)分析,研究人權(quán)與知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)兩種權(quán)利的沖突原因、沖突表現(xiàn)和沖突的全球治理情況,并嘗試探求知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)全球治理的人權(quán)進(jìn)路。 引言部分,主要提出研究的問題與研究目的,闡明分析的路徑與方法。 第一章,對(duì)作為財(cái)產(chǎn)權(quán)的知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)進(jìn)行研究,討論了有關(guān)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)的概念和特征、評(píng)價(jià)關(guān)于知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)正當(dāng)性(Justification)的學(xué)說(shuō),通過對(duì)財(cái)產(chǎn)權(quán)意義上的知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)的討論與分析,為界定知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)與人權(quán)的不同權(quán)利屬性提供理論基礎(chǔ)。 第二章,知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)與人權(quán)的沖突產(chǎn)生的原因。知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)對(duì)人權(quán)產(chǎn)生沖擊,正是知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)法律全球化過程中產(chǎn)生的結(jié)果,本章主要討論知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)法律全球化的進(jìn)程與影響,探析知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)與人權(quán)沖突的各種原因。 第三章,分析知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)與人權(quán)沖突的表現(xiàn),重點(diǎn)分析《與貿(mào)易有關(guān)的知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)協(xié)議》(TRIPS協(xié)議)對(duì)人權(quán)的沖擊。初步分析知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)與人權(quán)沖突的表現(xiàn)；鑒于正是世界貿(mào)易組織的TRIPS協(xié)議引起國(guó)際社會(huì)對(duì)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)與人權(quán)沖突問題的高度關(guān)注并開展相應(yīng)的全球治理行動(dòng),TRIPS協(xié)議是觸發(fā)國(guó)際社會(huì)“知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)的人權(quán)”議題的觸媒劑,也是人權(quán)與知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)沖突的焦點(diǎn),因此本章著重對(duì)TRIPS協(xié)議與人權(quán)問題展開討論,指出實(shí)現(xiàn)國(guó)際人權(quán)條約下的人權(quán)義務(wù)和實(shí)現(xiàn)TRIPS條約下的知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)義務(wù)兩方面具有不平衡性。 第四章,分析知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)與人權(quán)的沖突產(chǎn)生的原因。首先,明確了利益沖突是知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)與人權(quán)的沖突產(chǎn)生的根本原因。其次,全球化條件下人權(quán)的成長(zhǎng)與知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)的擴(kuò)展導(dǎo)致權(quán)利沖突。最后,由于國(guó)際法律對(duì)人權(quán)的識(shí)別和確認(rèn)模糊不清,也導(dǎo)致了在更多的方面潛在人權(quán)與知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)的沖突與緊張。而另外還有一種沖突源自“軟法”和“硬法”的沖突。 結(jié)束語(yǔ)部分得出研究結(jié)論：現(xiàn)存的知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)國(guó)際體制是與人權(quán)相沖突的,必須通過全球治理建立一個(gè)符合人權(quán)目標(biāo)的知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)體制。我國(guó)應(yīng)采取積極措施,在滿足知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)國(guó)際公約最低保護(hù)要求前提下,充分利用國(guó)際公約的選擇性條款和限制性條款,從最大程度地保障我國(guó)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)利益出發(fā),確定是否應(yīng)當(dāng)保護(hù)以及如何保護(hù)；以利益平衡原則為指導(dǎo),進(jìn)一步完善知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)法律制度,尤其是要盡快出臺(tái)規(guī)制知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)濫用行為的法律條款；緊密結(jié)合國(guó)家知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)戰(zhàn)略,建立以知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)為導(dǎo)向的公共政策體系；密切關(guān)注國(guó)際知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)制度發(fā)展的最新動(dòng)態(tài),積極參與到知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)國(guó)際事務(wù)的交流與合作。
[Abstract]:The intellectual property protection standard led by developed countries has basically realized the goal of globalization. The direct consequence of the legal globalization of intellectual property is that the conflict between intellectual property and human rights, in particular the TRIPS Agreement, is a direct impact on human rights, In the light of the two categories of rights and intellectual property rights, this paper discusses the two international regimes (Regime), discusses the evolution of the legal globalization of intellectual property, and describes the expansion of the right of the intellectual property right in the process of globalization; it is produced by the human rights treaty, The evolution of the development and human rights itself examines the growth of human rights in the context of globalization. By analyzing the conflicts and co-existence of the two rights under the conditions of globalization, through the text analysis, the ethical analysis and the economic analysis of the international treaties, the causes of the conflict between the two rights of human rights and intellectual property, the conflict performance and the global governance of the conflict are studied. And try to explore the human rights approach to the global governance of intellectual property. The introduction part, mainly put forward the research question and the research purpose, clarify the path and the party of the analysis The first chapter studies the intellectual property right as property right, discusses the concept and characteristics of the intellectual property right, and evaluates the theory about the legitimacy of intellectual property, and through the discussion of the intellectual property right in the sense of property right and analysis to provide a basis for defining the different rights attributes of intellectual property rights and human rights On the foundation. Chapter two, the conflict between intellectual property and human rights The impact of intellectual property rights on human rights is the result of the process of the legal globalization of intellectual property. This chapter mainly discusses the process and influence of the legal globalization of intellectual property, and probes into the conflict between intellectual property and human rights. The third chapter analyses the performance of the conflict between intellectual property and human rights, with a focus on the analysis of the TRIPS Agreement (TRIPS) ) Impact on human rights. Initial analysis of the performance of the conflict between intellectual property and human rights; in view of the fact that the TRIPS Agreement of the World Trade Organization has raised the international community's high interest in the issue of intellectual property and human rights conflicts and the corresponding global governance action, the TRIPS Agreement is the trigger of the international community "Human rights of international property" The topic's catalytic agent is also the focus of the conflict between human rights and intellectual property rights, so this chapter focuses on the discussion on the TRIPS Agreement and human rights issues, pointing out the realization of the human rights obligations under international human rights treaties and the realization of the protection of intellectual property rights under the TRIPS Treaty There is an imbalance in the face. Chapter 4, Analysis of Intellectual Property and Human The conflict of the right is the cause of the conflict. First, it is clear that the conflict of interest is intellectual property and human rights The root causes of the conflict. Second, the growth of human rights and intellectual property rights under the condition of globalization The extension of the right to conflict leads to a conflict of rights. Finally, the recognition and recognition of human rights by international law has also led to the potential human rights and knowledge in more ways To recognize the conflict and tension of property rights. There is also a conflict that is derived from the "soft method" and the "hard method" The conclusion is that the existing international system of intellectual property is in conflict with human rights and must be established through global governance. Our country should take active measures to make full use of the optional clauses and restrictive clauses of the international conventions, in order to guarantee the interests of the intellectual property rights of our country to the greatest extent, in order to guarantee the interests of the intellectual property rights of our country. No protection and protection should be protected; in the light of the principle of interest balance, the legal system of intellectual property rights should be further improved, in particular, the legal provisions regulating the abuse of intellectual property rights should be introduced as soon as possible; and the national intellectual property strategy should be closely integrated, and knowledge production should be established. Right-oriented public policy system; pay close attention to the latest developments in the development of the international intellectual property system, and actively participate in the knowledge production
【學(xué)位授予單位】：廣西師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號(hào)】：D996.1;D997.1
本文編號(hào)：2460778
[Abstract]:The intellectual property protection standard led by developed countries has basically realized the goal of globalization. The direct consequence of the legal globalization of intellectual property is that the conflict between intellectual property and human rights, in particular the TRIPS Agreement, is a direct impact on human rights, In the light of the two categories of rights and intellectual property rights, this paper discusses the two international regimes (Regime), discusses the evolution of the legal globalization of intellectual property, and describes the expansion of the right of the intellectual property right in the process of globalization; it is produced by the human rights treaty, The evolution of the development and human rights itself examines the growth of human rights in the context of globalization. By analyzing the conflicts and co-existence of the two rights under the conditions of globalization, through the text analysis, the ethical analysis and the economic analysis of the international treaties, the causes of the conflict between the two rights of human rights and intellectual property, the conflict performance and the global governance of the conflict are studied. And try to explore the human rights approach to the global governance of intellectual property. The introduction part, mainly put forward the research question and the research purpose, clarify the path and the party of the analysis The first chapter studies the intellectual property right as property right, discusses the concept and characteristics of the intellectual property right, and evaluates the theory about the legitimacy of intellectual property, and through the discussion of the intellectual property right in the sense of property right and analysis to provide a basis for defining the different rights attributes of intellectual property rights and human rights On the foundation. Chapter two, the conflict between intellectual property and human rights The impact of intellectual property rights on human rights is the result of the process of the legal globalization of intellectual property. This chapter mainly discusses the process and influence of the legal globalization of intellectual property, and probes into the conflict between intellectual property and human rights. The third chapter analyses the performance of the conflict between intellectual property and human rights, with a focus on the analysis of the TRIPS Agreement (TRIPS) ) Impact on human rights. Initial analysis of the performance of the conflict between intellectual property and human rights; in view of the fact that the TRIPS Agreement of the World Trade Organization has raised the international community's high interest in the issue of intellectual property and human rights conflicts and the corresponding global governance action, the TRIPS Agreement is the trigger of the international community "Human rights of international property" The topic's catalytic agent is also the focus of the conflict between human rights and intellectual property rights, so this chapter focuses on the discussion on the TRIPS Agreement and human rights issues, pointing out the realization of the human rights obligations under international human rights treaties and the realization of the protection of intellectual property rights under the TRIPS Treaty There is an imbalance in the face. Chapter 4, Analysis of Intellectual Property and Human The conflict of the right is the cause of the conflict. First, it is clear that the conflict of interest is intellectual property and human rights The root causes of the conflict. Second, the growth of human rights and intellectual property rights under the condition of globalization The extension of the right to conflict leads to a conflict of rights. Finally, the recognition and recognition of human rights by international law has also led to the potential human rights and knowledge in more ways To recognize the conflict and tension of property rights. There is also a conflict that is derived from the "soft method" and the "hard method" The conclusion is that the existing international system of intellectual property is in conflict with human rights and must be established through global governance. Our country should take active measures to make full use of the optional clauses and restrictive clauses of the international conventions, in order to guarantee the interests of the intellectual property rights of our country to the greatest extent, in order to guarantee the interests of the intellectual property rights of our country. No protection and protection should be protected; in the light of the principle of interest balance, the legal system of intellectual property rights should be further improved, in particular, the legal provisions regulating the abuse of intellectual property rights should be introduced as soon as possible; and the national intellectual property strategy should be closely integrated, and knowledge production should be established. Right-oriented public policy system; pay close attention to the latest developments in the development of the international intellectual property system, and actively participate in the knowledge production
【學(xué)位授予單位】：廣西師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號(hào)】：D996.1;D997.1
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 葉傳星;;人權(quán)概念的理論分歧解析[J];法學(xué)家;2005年06期
2 魯浪浪;;論知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)領(lǐng)域社會(huì)正義的實(shí)現(xiàn)[J];法制與社會(huì);2009年15期
3 李良才;;人權(quán)理念對(duì)國(guó)際法價(jià)值取向的人本化改造[J];甘肅聯(lián)合大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2009年01期
4 徐莉;;論貿(mào)易與人權(quán)保護(hù)制度的協(xié)調(diào)[J];時(shí)代法學(xué);2009年02期
5 陳瑛琦;;TRIPS協(xié)議第31條修正案研究[J];合作經(jīng)濟(jì)與科技;2009年17期
6 沈宗靈;權(quán)利、義務(wù)、權(quán)力[J];法學(xué)研究;1998年03期
7 李楊;陳思琴;;傳統(tǒng)知識(shí)保護(hù)的自然法合理性初探——從集體人權(quán)與羅爾斯“正義論”的角度來(lái)審視[J];南昌航空大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2009年02期
8 陳亦超;;國(guó)際知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)中的人權(quán)問題——從藥品強(qiáng)制許可談起[J];麗水學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2009年01期
9 鄭欣;;論知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)人身權(quán)與人權(quán)[J];牡丹江大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2009年08期
10 勝雅律;;人權(quán)概念在聯(lián)合國(guó)的發(fā)展[J];人權(quán);2009年01期
相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前2條
1 馬秀山;[N];中國(guó)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)報(bào);2004年
2 邵培樟;[N];中國(guó)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)報(bào);2004年
相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前4條
1 王培舒;知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)與人權(quán)的聯(lián)系、沖突與協(xié)調(diào)發(fā)展[D];吉林大學(xué);2007年
2 趙宴群;文化權(quán)利的確立與實(shí)現(xiàn)[D];復(fù)旦大學(xué);2007年
3 胡朝陽(yáng);論知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)的正當(dāng)性[D];南京師范大學(xué);2006年
4 衣淑玲;國(guó)際人權(quán)法視角下《TRIPS協(xié)定》的變革研究[D];廈門大學(xué);2008年
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前4條
1 田勝;知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)與人權(quán)的沖突和協(xié)調(diào)[D];中南民族大學(xué);2007年
2 孫秀紅;知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)國(guó)際保護(hù)與人權(quán)關(guān)系問題研究[D];吉林大學(xué);2008年
3 侯淑芬;論艾滋病防治領(lǐng)域的國(guó)際法新問題[D];中國(guó)海洋大學(xué);2008年
4 顏君;WTO中人權(quán)相關(guān)條款研究[D];外交學(xué)院;2009年
，本文編號(hào)：2460778
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/guojifa/2460778.html
最近更新
教材專著
