【摘要】：國(guó)際商事仲裁,意指爭(zhēng)議雙方將商事糾紛交由約定的仲裁庭,由仲裁庭作出對(duì)各方當(dāng)事人均具有約束力的裁決。國(guó)際商事仲裁與跨國(guó)的民事訴訟相比,具有高效、保密、快捷、易獲得執(zhí)行等優(yōu)勢(shì),受到大多數(shù)國(guó)際商事主體青睞,每年提交國(guó)際商事仲裁的案件數(shù)量居高不下。國(guó)際商事仲裁具有非常明顯的意思自治特征,然而,國(guó)際商事仲裁裁決若要獲得強(qiáng)制執(zhí)行,必須要符合一定的實(shí)體法和程序法上的要求。無論是國(guó)際公約層面,還是各國(guó)國(guó)內(nèi)立法層面,均對(duì)國(guó)際商事仲裁裁決獲得承認(rèn)與執(zhí)行的條件進(jìn)行了規(guī)定。在當(dāng)事人向一國(guó)法院申請(qǐng)強(qiáng)制執(zhí)行國(guó)際商事仲裁裁決時(shí),各國(guó)法院一般都會(huì)對(duì)該商事仲裁裁決的實(shí)體合法性以及程序合法性根據(jù)本國(guó)立法進(jìn)行司法審查。究其原因,一方面,在國(guó)際商事仲裁活動(dòng)中,作為私法主體的雙方當(dāng)事人的意思自治需受到法律的制約;另一方面,由于國(guó)際商事仲裁裁決的執(zhí)行往往涉及到一國(guó)當(dāng)事人及位于該國(guó)境內(nèi)的財(cái)產(chǎn),因此,為國(guó)際商事仲裁裁決進(jìn)行司法審查亦是國(guó)家行使司法主權(quán)之需要。因而,筆者在文中對(duì)國(guó)際商事仲裁裁決的司法審查制度進(jìn)行了考證研究,并對(duì)我國(guó)相關(guān)立法及近年司法實(shí)踐中遇到的問題進(jìn)行了總結(jié),并提出完善建議。具體而言,本文內(nèi)容分為四個(gè)部分。
[Abstract]:International commercial arbitration means that the parties to the dispute refer the commercial dispute to the agreed arbitration tribunal, and the arbitration tribunal shall make a binding decision to the parties. Compared with the transnational civil action, the international commercial arbitration has the advantages of high efficiency, confidentiality, rapidness, easy implementation and the like, and is favored by most international commercial subjects, and the number of cases submitted to the international commercial arbitration every year is high. International commercial arbitration has a very clear meaning of self-government. However, if the international commercial arbitration award is to be enforced, it must meet the requirements of a certain substantive law and procedural law. Both the international convention and the national legislative level provide for the recognition and enforcement of the international commercial arbitration award. When a party applies for enforcement of an international commercial arbitration award to a court of a State, national courts generally conduct judicial review of the legality of the entity of the commercial arbitration award and the legality of the procedure in accordance with its national legislation. The reason is that, on the one hand, in the event of international commercial arbitration, the autonomy of the parties acting as the subject of private law is subject to the restriction of the law; on the other hand, since the enforcement of the international commercial arbitration award is often involved in the property in the country and in the country, The judicial review of the international commercial arbitration award is also the need for the State to exercise judicial sovereignty. Therefore, the author has made a textual research on the judicial review system of the international commercial arbitration award, and summarized the relevant legislation in China and the problems encountered in the judicial practice in recent years, and put forward some suggestions. In particular, the contents of this paper are divided into four parts.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：南京師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：D997.4

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 熊瑛子;;國(guó)際體育仲裁中越權(quán)裁決的司法審查[J];蘇州大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(法學(xué)版);2016年04期

2 肖蓓;;《紐約公約》背景下我國(guó)對(duì)外國(guó)仲裁裁決承認(rèn)及執(zhí)行的實(shí)證研究[J];現(xiàn)代法學(xué);2016年03期

3 于喜富;;論爭(zhēng)議可仲裁性司法審查之啟動(dòng)程序[J];法學(xué)評(píng)論;2016年03期

4 金鑫;;論法國(guó)法上仲裁庭否認(rèn)自身管轄權(quán)的仲裁裁決——以Abela案為例[J];法學(xué)評(píng)論;2015年02期

5 何其生;;國(guó)際商事仲裁司法審查中的公共政策[J];中國(guó)社會(huì)科學(xué);2014年07期

6 毛海波;;芻議國(guó)際商事仲裁裁決司法監(jiān)督的最新趨勢(shì)——以英國(guó)達(dá)納案件為切入[J];仲裁研究;2013年02期

7 楊弘磊;;中國(guó)內(nèi)地法院《紐約公約》項(xiàng)下外國(guó)仲裁裁決司法審查之新近實(shí)踐述評(píng)[J];武大國(guó)際法評(píng)論;2012年02期

8 石現(xiàn)明;;國(guó)際商事仲裁當(dāng)事人擴(kuò)大司法審查范圍之協(xié)議及其效力探析[J];北京交通大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2012年01期

9 謝新勝;;國(guó)際商事仲裁裁決撤銷制度“廢棄論”之批判[J];法商研究;2010年05期

10 卞建林;;我國(guó)司法權(quán)威的缺失與樹立[J];法學(xué)論壇;2010年01期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 宋家法;國(guó)際商事仲裁司法審查制度研究[D];武漢大學(xué);2014年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 李晨;國(guó)際商事仲裁管轄權(quán)的司法審查研究[D];復(fù)旦大學(xué);2013年

2 徐飛云;論法院對(duì)國(guó)際商事仲裁裁決程序性瑕疵的司法審查[D];南京大學(xué);2012年

3 張偉;論國(guó)際商事仲裁裁決的司法審查[D];山東大學(xué);2007年

，

本文編號(hào)：2456307