國(guó)際法基本原則的迷失:動(dòng)因與出路
[Abstract]:The theoretical and practical circles of international law in China attach great importance to the status and function of the basic principles of international law for a long time, and some foreign scholars have expounded it specially. However, in the practice of international law, especially in the practice of international justice, the basic principles of international law are seldom mentioned and are in a state of loss. Through the comparison between the basic principles of international law and the "general principles of law" stipulated in the Statute of the International Court of Justice, it can be seen that the basic principles of international law have the defect that they have not been formally stipulated in the list of sources of law; Through the comparison between the basic principles of international law and the recent "jus cogens", it can be found that the pure political origin of the basic principles of international law is the main cause of its tendency towards specialization and marginalization in the process of technicalization of international law as a whole. Moral-driven political decisions play with technology-masked interest-oriented, the latter gaining an advantage. However, from the perspective of the way forward, the fundamental principles of international law, characterized by trade-offs, play a guiding, coordinating and integrated role in the contemporary system of international law in order to meet the needs of the future healthy development of international law, Therefore, we should give and promote the status of the basic principles of international law. China, as a latecomer of international law, should continue to attach great importance to and advocate the basic principles of international law.
【作者單位】: 2011計(jì)劃·司法文明協(xié)同創(chuàng)新中心;吉林大學(xué)法學(xué)院;武漢大學(xué)國(guó)際法研究所;吉林大學(xué)理論法學(xué)研究中心;
【基金】:教育部人文社科重點(diǎn)研究基地項(xiàng)目“提升中國(guó)話語(yǔ)權(quán)與國(guó)際法律制度變革”(16JJD820010)的階段性研究成果
【分類號(hào)】:D99
【相似文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 李化;王振旭;;構(gòu)建國(guó)際法基本原則變革的理論基礎(chǔ)[J];理論月刊;2011年02期
2 王鍇;;現(xiàn)代國(guó)際法基本原則的核心——和平共處五項(xiàng)原則[J];牡丹江師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2004年02期
3 胡佳;;全球化形勢(shì)下國(guó)際法基本原則的新發(fā)展[J];北京青年政治學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2006年03期
4 徐廣蓬;;國(guó)際法基本原則面臨的困境與對(duì)策分析——科索沃單方宣布獨(dú)立及南奧塞梯、阿布哈茲問(wèn)題引發(fā)的思考[J];新西部(下半月);2009年03期
5 孫智慧;論鄧小平理論對(duì)國(guó)際法基本原則的發(fā)展與貢獻(xiàn)[J];華北電力大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2000年04期
6 李紅;張雷仝;劉挺;;美國(guó)違反國(guó)際法基本原則行為分析——以臺(tái)灣問(wèn)題為例[J];商業(yè)文化(下半月);2011年05期
7 胡德勝;可持續(xù)發(fā)展是國(guó)際法的一項(xiàng)基本原則[J];鄭州大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2001年02期
8 一丁;;“不干涉內(nèi)政”是國(guó)際法基本原則[J];世界知識(shí);1990年03期
9 齊愛(ài)民;雷朝霞;;后危機(jī)背景下對(duì)美國(guó)301條款的重新審視[J];西北大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2012年03期
10 侯富儒;戰(zhàn)后國(guó)際法基本原則體系的建立與新發(fā)展——紀(jì)念《聯(lián)合國(guó)憲章》問(wèn)世60周年[J];西南民族大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(人文社科版);2005年05期
相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前1條
1 苗海強(qiáng);;鄧小平對(duì)國(guó)際法基本原則的堅(jiān)持與發(fā)展[A];西部發(fā)展的理論與實(shí)踐[C];2004年
相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前4條
1 東北林業(yè)大學(xué)人文學(xué)院法律系副教授 王群;和諧世界理念和國(guó)際法基本原則[N];光明日?qǐng)?bào);2007年
2 ;中方公布越南在西沙挑釁證據(jù)[N];東方早報(bào);2014年
3 駐莫斯科首席記者 孫長(zhǎng)棟;俄不謀求霸權(quán),也不容許別國(guó)超越[N];文匯報(bào);2013年
4 華東政法大學(xué)國(guó)際法學(xué)院教授 丁成耀;菲律賓強(qiáng)推國(guó)際仲裁絕不可能得逞[N];法制日?qǐng)?bào);2014年
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前3條
1 崔錚;軍事干涉與國(guó)際法基本原則問(wèn)題研究[D];大連海事大學(xué);2005年
2 崔薇;《聯(lián)合國(guó)反腐敗公約》與國(guó)際法基本原則問(wèn)題研究[D];大連海事大學(xué);2007年
3 徐炅;淺析美國(guó)干涉伊拉克對(duì)國(guó)際法基本原則的違反[D];中國(guó)政法大學(xué);2007年
,本文編號(hào):2453581
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/guojifa/2453581.html