國際商事仲裁裁決承認與執(zhí)行中的公共政策運用
發(fā)布時間：2019-02-17 14:02
【摘要】：近年來,隨著國際經(jīng)濟交往活動日益頻繁,國際民商事爭議日益增多,越來越多的國際商事爭議當(dāng)事人選擇以仲裁方式解決糾紛。而裁決的承認和執(zhí)行,是商事仲裁制度的核心問題之一,它決定著當(dāng)事人的意思自治能否實現(xiàn)、仲裁裁決的價值能否最終實現(xiàn)�！都~約公約》明確將違反公共政策作為執(zhí)行地國法院拒絕承認和執(zhí)行裁決的理由之一,但是卻沒有對公共政策作出明確的定義,而是將此問題留給了各國法院。因此,對于裁決的承認和執(zhí)行,執(zhí)行地國法院擁有最終的決定權(quán)。由于各國的國情存在巨大差異,對于公共政策的理解也必然存在不同,公共政策對于請求承認及執(zhí)行仲裁裁決的當(dāng)事人來說,如同懸掛在其頭上的一把劍。但是,正由于這種的特性,才使得它在國際商事仲裁領(lǐng)域能夠永葆生機,在一國法院排除外國法律的適用、拒絕承認外國仲裁裁決中,作為維護本國根本利益的有力武器。本文旨在通過對國際商事仲裁承認與執(zhí)行領(lǐng)域中公共政策制度的理論分析以及各國實踐中的具體適用,分析我國在國際商事仲裁承認與執(zhí)行領(lǐng)域中公共政策運用中存在的問題,為完善我國公共政策運用提出些許建議。
[Abstract]:In recent years, with the increasingly frequent international economic exchanges, international civil and commercial disputes are increasing, more and more parties to international commercial disputes choose arbitration to resolve disputes. The recognition and enforcement of the award is one of the core issues in the commercial arbitration system, which determines whether the autonomy of the parties' will can be realized. Whether the value of an arbitral award can ultimately be realized. The New York Convention explicitly makes breach of public policy one of the grounds for refusing recognition and enforcement of the award by the courts of the State in which it is enforced, but does not provide a clear definition of public policy, Instead, the matter was left to national courts. Therefore, for the recognition and enforcement of the award, the court of the country of enforcement has the final decision. Due to the great differences in the national conditions of each country, the understanding of public policy is bound to be different. Public policy is like a sword hanging on its head to the party requesting recognition and enforcement of an arbitral award. However, it is precisely because of this characteristic that it can always retain its vitality in the field of international commercial arbitration. It can exclude the application of foreign law in the courts of a country and refuse to recognize foreign arbitral awards as a powerful weapon to safeguard the fundamental interests of its own country. The purpose of this paper is to analyze the problems existing in the application of public policy in the field of recognition and enforcement of international commercial arbitration through the theoretical analysis of the public policy system in the field of recognition and enforcement of international commercial arbitration and the practical application in various countries. In order to improve the use of public policy in China put forward some suggestions.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：復(fù)旦大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：D997.4
本文編號：2425240
[Abstract]:In recent years, with the increasingly frequent international economic exchanges, international civil and commercial disputes are increasing, more and more parties to international commercial disputes choose arbitration to resolve disputes. The recognition and enforcement of the award is one of the core issues in the commercial arbitration system, which determines whether the autonomy of the parties' will can be realized. Whether the value of an arbitral award can ultimately be realized. The New York Convention explicitly makes breach of public policy one of the grounds for refusing recognition and enforcement of the award by the courts of the State in which it is enforced, but does not provide a clear definition of public policy, Instead, the matter was left to national courts. Therefore, for the recognition and enforcement of the award, the court of the country of enforcement has the final decision. Due to the great differences in the national conditions of each country, the understanding of public policy is bound to be different. Public policy is like a sword hanging on its head to the party requesting recognition and enforcement of an arbitral award. However, it is precisely because of this characteristic that it can always retain its vitality in the field of international commercial arbitration. It can exclude the application of foreign law in the courts of a country and refuse to recognize foreign arbitral awards as a powerful weapon to safeguard the fundamental interests of its own country. The purpose of this paper is to analyze the problems existing in the application of public policy in the field of recognition and enforcement of international commercial arbitration through the theoretical analysis of the public policy system in the field of recognition and enforcement of international commercial arbitration and the practical application in various countries. In order to improve the use of public policy in China put forward some suggestions.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：復(fù)旦大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：D997.4
【參考文獻】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 杜新麗;論外國仲裁裁決在我國的承認與執(zhí)行——兼論《紐約公約》在中國的適用[J];比較法研究;2005年04期
2 顧維遐;;《紐約公約》下的公共政策解讀:兩岸四地的區(qū)域性發(fā)展與合作[J];比較法研究;2010年01期
3 黃亞英;;仲裁制度的發(fā)展與《紐約公約》的歷史貢獻——紀念《紐約公約》創(chuàng)設(shè)50周年[J];北京仲裁;2008年03期
4 趙秀文;;論非內(nèi)國裁決的法律性質(zhì)——兼論《紐約公約》的適用范圍[J];北京仲裁;2008年04期
5 黃亞英;;論《紐約公約》與仲裁協(xié)議的法律適用——兼評中國加入《紐約公約》二十年的實踐[J];法律科學(xué)(西北政法大學(xué)學(xué)報);2009年02期
6 萬鄂湘;;《紐約公約》在中國的司法實踐[J];法律適用;2009年03期
7 黃亞英,李薇薇;論1958年《紐約公約》中的“更優(yōu)權(quán)利條款”[J];法學(xué)雜志;2000年02期
8 趙秀文;論ICC國際仲裁院裁決在我國的承認與執(zhí)行[J];法學(xué);2005年06期
9 趙秀文;;從相關(guān)案例看ICC仲裁院裁決在我國的承認與執(zhí)行[J];法學(xué);2010年03期
10 張瀟劍;;論國際商事仲裁中的法律選擇[J];求是學(xué)刊;2011年02期
，本文編號：2425240
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/guojifa/2425240.html
