國(guó)際碳交易制度的法律問題研究
發(fā)布時(shí)間:2019-01-27 21:52
【摘要】:1992年“聯(lián)合國(guó)環(huán)境與發(fā)展會(huì)議”上,清潔發(fā)展機(jī)制根本母法—《聯(lián)合國(guó)氣候變化框架公約》由155個(gè)國(guó)家簽署。1997年,具有法律約束力的《京都議定書》在聯(lián)合國(guó)氣候變化框架公約第三屆締約國(guó)會(huì)議上獲得通過;議定書的第十二條“確定一種清潔發(fā)展機(jī)制”。2001年,聯(lián)合國(guó)氣候變化框架公約第七屆締約國(guó)會(huì)議,通過了切實(shí)貫徹《京都議定書》建立的機(jī)制的一系列決定文件,這些文件被稱為“馬拉喀什文件”。依據(jù)以上的法律文件,碳交易得以開展。 國(guó)外,尤其是歐美等國(guó),對(duì)于碳交易的研究比較深入,這也是為什么歐盟的排放權(quán)交易制度發(fā)展的如此迅速的原因;美國(guó)、澳洲作為“京都議定書”體系外的國(guó)家,其碳交易機(jī)制的建立也不能不得益于其對(duì)碳交易的理論研究。 但反觀國(guó)內(nèi),雖然也有很多學(xué)者對(duì)這一問題進(jìn)行了有益的探討,但研究力量過于分散,缺乏統(tǒng)一的研究機(jī)構(gòu)對(duì)其進(jìn)行引導(dǎo)和管理,使得國(guó)內(nèi)的研究成果并不是很豐富,這一系列問題造成了我國(guó)在國(guó)際碳交易的舞臺(tái)上略顯被動(dòng)的局面。 本文主要分為三個(gè)部分。第一部分為第1章,是關(guān)于目前國(guó)際碳交易市場(chǎng)的概述。第二部分包括第2章和3章,通過分析幾個(gè)重要的國(guó)際環(huán)境法原則,找出目前國(guó)際碳交易中存在諸多沖突的原因。第三部分為第4章,基于第二部分的分析,以“環(huán)境正義”的視角審視目前國(guó)際碳交易法律制度,并努力尋求國(guó)際碳交易制度的發(fā)展完善之道。
[Abstract]:At the 1992 United Nations Conference on Environment and Development, the underlying mother law of the clean development mechanism, the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate change, was signed by 155 countries. In 1997, The legally binding Kyoto Protocol was adopted at the third session of the Conference of the parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate change; The seventh session of the Conference of the parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate change, in 2001, adopted a series of decision documents for the effective implementation of the mechanisms established by the Kyoto Protocol, These documents are called the Marrakech document. According to the above legal documents, carbon trading can be carried out. Abroad, especially in Europe and the United States, the research on carbon trading is more in-depth, which is why the emission trading system of the European Union develops so rapidly. As a country outside Kyoto Protocol, the establishment of carbon trading mechanism in the United States and Australia can not help but benefit from its theoretical research on carbon trading. But on the other hand, although there are many scholars in China who have made some useful discussions on this issue, the research force is too scattered and the research institutions are lacking in the guidance and management of the research, which makes the domestic research results not very rich. This series of problems caused our country in the international carbon trading stage a little passive situation. This paper is divided into three parts. The first part is chapter 1, which is an overview of the current international carbon trading market. The second part includes chapter 2 and chapter 3, through the analysis of several important principles of international environmental law, to find out the current international carbon trading in the existence of many conflicts. The third part is the fourth chapter. Based on the analysis of the second part, the author examines the current international carbon trading legal system from the perspective of "environmental justice", and tries to find a way to improve the international carbon trading system.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:南昌大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2011
【分類號(hào)】:D996
本文編號(hào):2416731
[Abstract]:At the 1992 United Nations Conference on Environment and Development, the underlying mother law of the clean development mechanism, the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate change, was signed by 155 countries. In 1997, The legally binding Kyoto Protocol was adopted at the third session of the Conference of the parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate change; The seventh session of the Conference of the parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate change, in 2001, adopted a series of decision documents for the effective implementation of the mechanisms established by the Kyoto Protocol, These documents are called the Marrakech document. According to the above legal documents, carbon trading can be carried out. Abroad, especially in Europe and the United States, the research on carbon trading is more in-depth, which is why the emission trading system of the European Union develops so rapidly. As a country outside Kyoto Protocol, the establishment of carbon trading mechanism in the United States and Australia can not help but benefit from its theoretical research on carbon trading. But on the other hand, although there are many scholars in China who have made some useful discussions on this issue, the research force is too scattered and the research institutions are lacking in the guidance and management of the research, which makes the domestic research results not very rich. This series of problems caused our country in the international carbon trading stage a little passive situation. This paper is divided into three parts. The first part is chapter 1, which is an overview of the current international carbon trading market. The second part includes chapter 2 and chapter 3, through the analysis of several important principles of international environmental law, to find out the current international carbon trading in the existence of many conflicts. The third part is the fourth chapter. Based on the analysis of the second part, the author examines the current international carbon trading legal system from the perspective of "environmental justice", and tries to find a way to improve the international carbon trading system.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:南昌大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2011
【分類號(hào)】:D996
【引證文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條
1 張志慧;歐盟航空碳排放交易指令的挑戰(zhàn)及其對(duì)策[D];大連海事大學(xué);2013年
,本文編號(hào):2416731
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/guojifa/2416731.html
最近更新
教材專著