【摘要】：在WT0和WIPO框架下,《與貿(mào)易有關(guān)的知識產(chǎn)權(quán)協(xié)議》(即TRIPs協(xié)議)規(guī)定了知識產(chǎn)權(quán)的最低保護標(biāo)準(zhǔn),并已被wTO所有成員國普遍接受,知識產(chǎn)權(quán)的保護標(biāo)準(zhǔn)基本實現(xiàn)了全球化。然而,發(fā)達國家并不滿足于這種集中在實體權(quán)利上的保護,他們追求更高標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的保護,進而把目光集中到執(zhí)法實踐上來。加之,經(jīng)濟全球化的進一步發(fā)展,使得知識產(chǎn)權(quán)貿(mào)易的比重日益增大,假冒和盜版更加猖獗,嚴重影響了經(jīng)濟的增長,尤其是知識產(chǎn)權(quán)強國(即發(fā)達國家)。因此,美歐等為發(fā)達國家秘密談判,制定了《反假冒貿(mào)易協(xié)定》(即Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement,簡稱ACTA)。這是一部旨在加強國際貿(mào)易中知識產(chǎn)權(quán)執(zhí)法標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的國際條約,其內(nèi)容主要針對民事、行政、刑事、邊境及數(shù)字環(huán)境下的四類執(zhí)法措施和保護手段。與TRIPs協(xié)議相比,《反假冒貿(mào)易協(xié)定》對知識產(chǎn)權(quán)執(zhí)法標(biāo)準(zhǔn)提出了更高的要求。《反假冒貿(mào)易協(xié)定》的生效和實施,標(biāo)志著知識產(chǎn)權(quán)國際保護新秩序的建立,它將成為國際知識產(chǎn)權(quán)保護制度的重要組成部分,這將對包括我國在內(nèi)的發(fā)展中國家產(chǎn)生巨大的影響。 引言部分,主要提出研究的問題及研究的目的。 第一章,通過分析《反假冒貿(mào)易協(xié)定》的產(chǎn)生背景,發(fā)達國家和發(fā)展中國家對該協(xié)定的不同態(tài)度以及該協(xié)定的最新發(fā)展動態(tài),來全面了解制定《反假冒貿(mào)易協(xié)定》的原因和發(fā)展過程。 第二章,介紹了《反假冒貿(mào)易協(xié)定》的主要內(nèi)容,分析出該協(xié)定的特點,從而更進-步的了解該協(xié)定。 第三章,與《TRIPs協(xié)議》中的相關(guān)規(guī)則進行比較,從民事措施、邊境措施、刑事措施、數(shù)字環(huán)境下的執(zhí)法措施以及爭端解決機制等方面進行詳細比較分析,從而看出該協(xié)定不僅保護標(biāo)準(zhǔn)超越了《TRIPs協(xié)議》的保護標(biāo)準(zhǔn),且規(guī)定更加嚴厲。 第四章,通過前三章的研究分析,對《反假冒貿(mào)易協(xié)定》有了深入了解,在這一章中對該協(xié)定的影響和與我國知識產(chǎn)權(quán)法的比較做了較詳細的分析后,提出我國的應(yīng)對策略。 結(jié)論部分,總結(jié)全文得出結(jié)論：《反假冒貿(mào)易協(xié)定》反映了發(fā)達國家的根本利益,凸顯出知識產(chǎn)權(quán)國際保護的強保護趨勢,標(biāo)志著知識產(chǎn)權(quán)國際保護新秩序的建立。而發(fā)展中國家一開始就已被排擠在外,這種被動會延續(xù)到日后的知識產(chǎn)權(quán)協(xié)議談判及國際貿(mào)易競爭中。因此,發(fā)展中國家不能置身事外,要密切關(guān)注《反假冒貿(mào)易協(xié)定》的發(fā)展動向,對其具體內(nèi)容進行專題研究,積極應(yīng)對未來的各種挑戰(zhàn),這對發(fā)展中國家尤其是中國具有重要的戰(zhàn)略意義。
[Abstract]:Under the framework of WT0 and WIPO, the Agreement on Trade-Related aspects of intellectual property Rights (TRIPs Agreement) stipulates the minimum standards for the protection of intellectual property rights, and has been generally accepted by all members of wTO. The standards for the protection of intellectual property rights have basically realized globalization. However, developed countries are not satisfied with the protection of substantive rights, they seek higher standards of protection, and then focus on law enforcement practice. In addition, with the further development of economic globalization, the proportion of intellectual property trade is increasing day by day, and counterfeiting and piracy are more rampant, which seriously affects the economic growth, especially the powerful intellectual property countries (that is, developed countries). Therefore, the United States and Europe and other developed countries secretly negotiated the "Anti-counterfeiting Trade Agreement" (Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement, for short ACTA).) This is an international treaty aimed at strengthening the standards of enforcement of intellectual property rights in international trade. Its contents are mainly aimed at four types of enforcement measures and means of protection in civil, administrative, criminal, border and digital environments. Compared with the TRIPs agreement, the Anti-counterfeiting Trade Agreement sets higher requirements for the enforcement standards of intellectual property rights. The entry into force and implementation of the Anti-counterfeiting Trade Agreement marks the establishment of a new order for the international protection of intellectual property rights. It will become an important part of the international intellectual property protection system, which will have a great impact on the developing countries, including China. The introduction part, mainly puts forward the research question and the research goal. Chapter one, by analysing the background of the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement, the different attitudes of developed and developing countries towards the Agreement and the latest developments in the Agreement, To fully understand the development of anti-counterfeiting trade agreement reasons and development process. The second chapter introduces the main contents of Anti-counterfeiting Trade Agreement and analyzes the characteristics of the Agreement so as to further understand the Agreement. The third chapter compares with the relevant rules in TRIPs Agreement, including civil measures, border measures, criminal measures, law enforcement measures in the digital environment and dispute settlement mechanism. Therefore, the protocol not only exceeds the protection standard of TRIPs protocol, but also has more strict provisions. The fourth chapter, through the research and analysis of the first three chapters, has a deep understanding of the Anti-counterfeiting Trade Agreement. In this chapter, the author makes a detailed analysis of the impact of the Agreement and the comparison with the intellectual property Law of China, and puts forward the countermeasures of our country. Conclusion: Anti-counterfeiting Trade Agreement reflects the fundamental interests of developed countries, highlights the trend of strong international protection of intellectual property rights, and marks the establishment of a new order for international protection of intellectual property rights. Developing countries have been excluded from the beginning, and this passivity will continue in future intellectual property negotiations and international trade competition. Therefore, developing countries cannot stand aside and should pay close attention to the development of the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement, carry out thematic studies on its specific content and actively address the challenges of the future, This is of great strategic significance to developing countries, especially China.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：廣西師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：D996

【引證文獻】

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 張猛;《反假冒貿(mào)易協(xié)定》（ACTA）解析：標(biāo)準(zhǔn)之變與體制之爭[D];吉林大學(xué);2013年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 李煥煥;我國應(yīng)對ACTA貿(mào)易壁壘的知識產(chǎn)權(quán)反制策略研究[D];南京理工大學(xué);2013年

，

本文編號：2414705