【摘要】：互聯(lián)網(wǎng)如今已經(jīng)滲透進(jìn)我們生活的方方面面,深刻地改變我們的生活方式,其所具有的全球性、虛擬性、多元性、自由性等特征天然和國(guó)際私法有著密不可分的聯(lián)系。從國(guó)際私法的角度對(duì)互聯(lián)網(wǎng)中的相關(guān)法律問題做出分析并非新穎,但其實(shí)用性卻令人著迷。 目前國(guó)內(nèi)對(duì)這一問題的研究主要集中在幾個(gè)領(lǐng)域:互聯(lián)網(wǎng)侵權(quán)與國(guó)際私法;網(wǎng)絡(luò)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)問題與國(guó)際私法;電子商務(wù)與國(guó)際私法。其中研究最多的當(dāng)屬侵權(quán)領(lǐng)域和合同領(lǐng)域,主要涉及連接點(diǎn)及隨之而來(lái)的法律適用問題,程序方面的管轄問題。 本文通過對(duì)傳統(tǒng)物理空間和互聯(lián)網(wǎng)空間進(jìn)行了橫向的比較,指出互聯(lián)網(wǎng)空間具有全球性、虛擬性和組織管理的特殊性,并進(jìn)一步比較了互聯(lián)網(wǎng)空間與傳統(tǒng)空間的區(qū)別以及對(duì)傳統(tǒng)法律環(huán)境的影響。在承認(rèn)并分析互聯(lián)網(wǎng)空間帶來(lái)的法律環(huán)境的變化的前提下,本文就目前研究中存在的三種導(dǎo)向進(jìn)行了說(shuō)明和分析,并認(rèn)為互聯(lián)網(wǎng)空間下的國(guó)際私法問題的解決不需要我們“不破不立”,實(shí)際上只是傳統(tǒng)法律關(guān)系發(fā)生的背景的變化,并以此為研究的基準(zhǔn)和導(dǎo)向。 互聯(lián)網(wǎng)對(duì)于傳統(tǒng)侵權(quán)領(lǐng)域的影響是首先需要關(guān)注的。在回顧傳統(tǒng)的侵權(quán)領(lǐng)域的法律適用方法后,對(duì)互聯(lián)網(wǎng)環(huán)境下侵權(quán)領(lǐng)域的新特征從人身權(quán)領(lǐng)域、財(cái)產(chǎn)權(quán)領(lǐng)域、知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)領(lǐng)域以及公法沖突領(lǐng)域進(jìn)行了分別解讀。進(jìn)一步說(shuō)明互聯(lián)網(wǎng)對(duì)傳統(tǒng)連接點(diǎn)和其他連接點(diǎn)的沖擊。在如何解決沖擊上列舉了如下法律選擇方法:侵權(quán)行為地法律適用,最密切聯(lián)系原則運(yùn)用,當(dāng)事人協(xié)議選擇法律,網(wǎng)絡(luò)社區(qū)自有規(guī)則,法律選擇單邊方法。 在合同法部分,回顧了客觀標(biāo)志在合同準(zhǔn)據(jù)法確定中的運(yùn)用,如合同締結(jié)地、履行地、當(dāng)事人住所地,并回顧了意思自治原則和最密切聯(lián)系原則、合同自體法原則。介紹了電子合同的運(yùn)用和影響,并著重討論了意思自治原則和最密切聯(lián)系原則在互聯(lián)網(wǎng)環(huán)境下的運(yùn)用和發(fā)展。 具體到管轄問題,回顧了互聯(lián)網(wǎng)對(duì)于傳統(tǒng)的屬地管轄、屬人管轄和傳統(tǒng)協(xié)議管轄的沖擊,對(duì)普通管轄權(quán)中的原告就被告等原則進(jìn)行了分析。重點(diǎn)分析了互聯(lián)網(wǎng)環(huán)境下協(xié)議管轄的地位和具體的判定方法。
[Abstract]:Nowadays, the Internet has penetrated into all aspects of our life and profoundly changed our way of life. Its global, fictitious, pluralistic and free characteristics are inextricably related to private international law. It is not new to analyze the relevant legal problems in the Internet from the perspective of private international law, but its practicability is fascinating. At present, the research on this problem is mainly focused on several fields: Internet infringement and private international law, network intellectual property rights and private international law, electronic commerce and private international law. Among them, the field of tort and contract is the most studied, mainly involving the connection point and the problems of the application of law and the jurisdiction of procedure. By comparing the traditional physical space with the Internet space, this paper points out that the Internet space has the particularity of global, fictitious and organizational management. Furthermore, the difference between Internet space and traditional space and its influence on traditional legal environment are compared. On the premise of acknowledging and analyzing the change of the legal environment brought by the Internet space, this paper explains and analyzes the three kinds of directions existing in the present research. The author thinks that the solution of the private international law problem under the Internet space does not need us to be "unbreakable", in fact, it is just the change of the background of the traditional legal relationship, and it is the basis and direction of the research. The impact of the Internet on the traditional tort field is the first concern. After reviewing the traditional methods of law application in the field of tort, this paper interprets the new features of the field of tort in the Internet environment from the field of personal rights, property rights, intellectual property rights and the field of conflict of public law. Further explain the impact of the Internet on traditional connection points and other connection points. On how to solve the impact, this paper lists the following legal options: the application of tort law, the application of the principle of the closest connection, the choice of the law by agreement of the parties, the self-rule of the network community, and the unilateral method of the law selection. In the part of contract law, the author reviews the application of objective signs in the determination of applicable law of contract, such as the place of contract conclusion, place of performance, place of residence of the parties, and the principle of autonomy of will and the principle of the closest connection, and the principle of autologous law of contract. This paper introduces the application and influence of electronic contract, and emphatically discusses the application and development of the principle of autonomy of will and the principle of closest connection in the Internet environment. On the issue of jurisdiction, this paper reviews the impact of Internet on traditional territorial jurisdiction, personal jurisdiction and traditional agreement jurisdiction, and analyzes the plaintiff's principle of defendant in ordinary jurisdiction. This paper mainly analyzes the status of the protocol jurisdiction and the specific judgment method under the Internet environment.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：中國(guó)社會(huì)科學(xué)院研究生院
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號(hào)】：D997

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前2條

1 肖永平,郭明磊;網(wǎng)址的法律地位探析[J];法學(xué)雜志;2000年03期

2 湯葉霞;;電子證據(jù)的相關(guān)法律問題[J];網(wǎng)絡(luò)法律評(píng)論;2001年00期

，

本文編號(hào)：2400301