可口可樂收購匯源的反壟斷法律問題研究
發(fā)布時間：2018-12-30 14:44
【摘要】：《反壟斷法》實施后，商務(wù)部加大了對外資企業(yè)并購內(nèi)資企業(yè)的審查力度，可口可樂收購匯源成為自該法實施以來未被審查通過的第一案。 可口可樂公司并不是自己發(fā)起對匯源的收購，而是通過其全資子公司進行收購，收購匯源全部股權(quán)。根據(jù)我國相關(guān)法律規(guī)定，達到一定條件的并購必須向商務(wù)部進行申報，而此次可口可樂對匯源的收購就達到了法律規(guī)定的要求。在收到申報材料后，商務(wù)部對此案正式開始立案審查。但在經(jīng)過初步審查后，商務(wù)部發(fā)現(xiàn)其并未完全按照法律的要求提供充足的材料，遂要求其提供相應(yīng)的修改方案。雖然可口可樂按照要求對材料進行了補充修改后仍未能達到商務(wù)部許可的標(biāo)準(zhǔn)，最終這次在策劃中的收購還是以失敗告終，成為首例未被商務(wù)部審核通過的案例。 文章主要以我國跨國并購反壟斷法律體系框架的構(gòu)建為最終目的來分析此案，通過全面、深入的分析達到筆者期望的目標(biāo)。文章包含四個部分主要內(nèi)容： 第一部分介紹案件基本情況，商務(wù)部對于該案是如何進行審查的，最終導(dǎo)致商務(wù)部否決這次并購的理由是什么。主要論述“可口可樂收購匯源案”的整個過程、商務(wù)部的審查程序以及做出的裁決。 第二部分深入分析了商務(wù)部是根據(jù)什么禁止可口可樂收購匯源的，其具體的反壟斷依據(jù)進是什么。主要從法律依據(jù)和事實依據(jù)兩個方面入手，深層次分析可口可樂收購匯源最終被禁止的反壟斷理由。 第三部分對可口可樂收購匯源案所反映的法律焦點問題結(jié)合相關(guān)理論知識進行分析，深入評析商務(wù)部對本次收購雙方各自產(chǎn)品在市場占有的份額、傳導(dǎo)效應(yīng)在本案中的使用情況、搭售對收購的影響、收購是否會擠壓其他企業(yè)的生存空間這些問題。 第四部分對于我國跨國并購反壟斷法律制度還可以做出哪些完善提出構(gòu)想。在這一部分，筆者具體分析了本案所反映出實體與程序方面我國反壟斷審查實制度規(guī)定的不足，建議借鑒歐美立法及實踐經(jīng)驗，來完善我國跨國并購反壟斷法律制度，筆者期望能通過自己的努力為我國跨國并購反壟斷問題的研究做出些許貢獻。
[Abstract]:Since the implementation of the Anti-monopoly Law, the Ministry of Commerce has stepped up the examination of foreign-funded enterprises' mergers and acquisitions of domestic enterprises, and Coca-Cola 's acquisition of Huiyuan has become the first case that has not been examined and passed since the implementation of the law. Coca-Cola is not launching its own acquisition of Huiyuan, but through its wholly owned subsidiary to acquire a full stake in Huiyuan. According to the relevant laws of our country, mergers and acquisitions that meet certain conditions must be declared to the Ministry of Commerce, and the Coca-Cola acquisition of Huiyuan has met the requirements of the law. After receiving the declaration materials, the Ministry of Commerce formally began to file the case for examination. However, after preliminary examination, the Ministry of Commerce found that it did not provide sufficient materials in accordance with the requirements of the law, and requested it to provide the corresponding amendment plan. Although Coke failed to meet the MOFCOM's approval criteria after making the required supplementary changes, the planned acquisition ended in failure and became the first case not approved by the ministry. This paper analyzes the case with the final purpose of constructing the legal framework of transnational merger and acquisition in China, and achieves the desired goal through comprehensive and in-depth analysis. The article includes four main parts: the first part introduces the basic situation of the case, how the MOFCOM reviews the case, and what is the reason why the MOFCOM vetoed the merger and acquisition. This paper mainly discusses the whole process of the "Coca Cola acquisition of Huiyuan case", the examination procedure and the ruling made by the Ministry of Commerce. The second part deeply analyzes what the Ministry of Commerce forbids Coca Cola to buy Huiyuan and what its antitrust basis is. Starting from the legal basis and the factual basis, the paper deeply analyzes the antitrust reasons why Coca-Cola 's acquisition of Huiyuan was finally prohibited. The third part analyzes the legal focus issues reflected in the case of Coca-Cola 's acquisition of Huiyuan and analyzes the respective market share of the respective products of the Ministry of Commerce. The use of conduction effect in this case, the effect of tying on the acquisition, and whether the acquisition will squeeze the living space of other enterprises. The fourth part puts forward some ideas about how to perfect the anti-monopoly legal system of cross-border M & A in our country. In this part, the author concretely analyzes the deficiency of the actual anti-monopoly examination system in the aspect of entity and procedure, and suggests to use European and American legislation and practical experience for reference to perfect the anti-monopoly legal system of transnational M & A in our country. The author hopes to make some contributions to the study of anti-monopoly problem of cross-border M & A in China through his own efforts.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：D996.1
本文編號：2395720
[Abstract]:Since the implementation of the Anti-monopoly Law, the Ministry of Commerce has stepped up the examination of foreign-funded enterprises' mergers and acquisitions of domestic enterprises, and Coca-Cola 's acquisition of Huiyuan has become the first case that has not been examined and passed since the implementation of the law. Coca-Cola is not launching its own acquisition of Huiyuan, but through its wholly owned subsidiary to acquire a full stake in Huiyuan. According to the relevant laws of our country, mergers and acquisitions that meet certain conditions must be declared to the Ministry of Commerce, and the Coca-Cola acquisition of Huiyuan has met the requirements of the law. After receiving the declaration materials, the Ministry of Commerce formally began to file the case for examination. However, after preliminary examination, the Ministry of Commerce found that it did not provide sufficient materials in accordance with the requirements of the law, and requested it to provide the corresponding amendment plan. Although Coke failed to meet the MOFCOM's approval criteria after making the required supplementary changes, the planned acquisition ended in failure and became the first case not approved by the ministry. This paper analyzes the case with the final purpose of constructing the legal framework of transnational merger and acquisition in China, and achieves the desired goal through comprehensive and in-depth analysis. The article includes four main parts: the first part introduces the basic situation of the case, how the MOFCOM reviews the case, and what is the reason why the MOFCOM vetoed the merger and acquisition. This paper mainly discusses the whole process of the "Coca Cola acquisition of Huiyuan case", the examination procedure and the ruling made by the Ministry of Commerce. The second part deeply analyzes what the Ministry of Commerce forbids Coca Cola to buy Huiyuan and what its antitrust basis is. Starting from the legal basis and the factual basis, the paper deeply analyzes the antitrust reasons why Coca-Cola 's acquisition of Huiyuan was finally prohibited. The third part analyzes the legal focus issues reflected in the case of Coca-Cola 's acquisition of Huiyuan and analyzes the respective market share of the respective products of the Ministry of Commerce. The use of conduction effect in this case, the effect of tying on the acquisition, and whether the acquisition will squeeze the living space of other enterprises. The fourth part puts forward some ideas about how to perfect the anti-monopoly legal system of cross-border M & A in our country. In this part, the author concretely analyzes the deficiency of the actual anti-monopoly examination system in the aspect of entity and procedure, and suggests to use European and American legislation and practical experience for reference to perfect the anti-monopoly legal system of transnational M & A in our country. The author hopes to make some contributions to the study of anti-monopoly problem of cross-border M & A in China through his own efforts.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：D996.1
【參考文獻】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前6條
1 崔本強;;外資并購對我國的影響及法律對策[J];商業(yè)研究;2008年10期
2 韓立余;歐盟合并控制法的根本變革[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);2005年02期
3 潘志成;;析商務(wù)部禁止可口可樂收購匯源的相關(guān)理由[J];法學(xué);2009年07期
4 商夢瑩;;反壟斷法中相關(guān)市場界定問題研究[J];法制與社會;2009年25期
5 張世國;;可口可樂收購匯源案的相關(guān)“規(guī)制”[J];中國外資;2008年10期
6 孫晉;翟孟;;對我國外資并購的反壟斷法思考——以美國可口可樂收購我國匯源為例[J];新疆大學(xué)學(xué)報(哲學(xué)人文社會科學(xué)版);2009年03期
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條
1 林飛翔;中國反壟斷相關(guān)市場的界定研究[D];廈門大學(xué);2009年
，本文編號：2395720
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/guojifa/2395720.html
