后危機(jī)時(shí)代資產(chǎn)證券化國(guó)際監(jiān)管制度改革對(duì)我國(guó)的啟示
發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-12-28 08:54
【摘要】：本文從分析本次金融危機(jī)中資產(chǎn)證券化國(guó)際監(jiān)管體系暴露的不足和缺陷入手,解讀相關(guān)國(guó)際組織和歐美各國(guó)監(jiān)管機(jī)構(gòu)在本次金融危機(jī)后發(fā)布的相關(guān)修訂意見(jiàn)和補(bǔ)充文件,對(duì)資本充足率監(jiān)管、系統(tǒng)性風(fēng)險(xiǎn)監(jiān)管、信用評(píng)級(jí)機(jī)構(gòu)監(jiān)管及信息披露監(jiān)管四方面進(jìn)行了改革。最終,結(jié)合我國(guó)資產(chǎn)證券化監(jiān)管的現(xiàn)狀及缺陷,著重闡述資產(chǎn)證券化國(guó)際監(jiān)管制度的改革對(duì)中國(guó)資產(chǎn)證券化監(jiān)管的啟示。論文主要內(nèi)容分為三章。 第一章闡述相關(guān)國(guó)際監(jiān)管制度在金融危機(jī)中暴露的缺陷。首先,作為本次金融危機(jī)誘因的合成型資產(chǎn)證券化的含義和流程,其與傳統(tǒng)型資產(chǎn)證券化相比擴(kuò)大了金融風(fēng)險(xiǎn)。其次,當(dāng)前相關(guān)國(guó)際監(jiān)管制度的缺陷是對(duì)合成型資產(chǎn)證券化交易中新增風(fēng)險(xiǎn)的關(guān)注不夠,對(duì)資產(chǎn)證券化等項(xiàng)目的資本計(jì)提不足；監(jiān)管理念對(duì)資產(chǎn)證券化帶來(lái)的系統(tǒng)性風(fēng)險(xiǎn)考慮不足；缺乏對(duì)信用評(píng)級(jí)機(jī)構(gòu)的監(jiān)管；沒(méi)有對(duì)資產(chǎn)證券化中信息不對(duì)稱(chēng)問(wèn)題的解決辦法。 第二章分析金融危機(jī)后相關(guān)國(guó)際監(jiān)管制度的改革。金融危機(jī)后,相關(guān)國(guó)際組織和歐美各國(guó)監(jiān)管機(jī)構(gòu)都發(fā)布了對(duì)原有資產(chǎn)證券化監(jiān)管制度的修訂意見(jiàn)和補(bǔ)充文件,對(duì)資本充足率監(jiān)管、系統(tǒng)性風(fēng)險(xiǎn)監(jiān)管、信用評(píng)級(jí)機(jī)構(gòu)監(jiān)管及信息披露監(jiān)管四方面進(jìn)行了改革。引入了杠桿率監(jiān)管標(biāo)準(zhǔn),增加了風(fēng)險(xiǎn)捕捉能力,完善了風(fēng)險(xiǎn)權(quán)重設(shè)計(jì),提高了資本充足率監(jiān)管標(biāo)準(zhǔn)；增加了宏觀審慎監(jiān)管,加強(qiáng)了流動(dòng)性監(jiān)管；加強(qiáng)了評(píng)級(jí)活動(dòng)的獨(dú)立性和可審性,明確了評(píng)級(jí)機(jī)構(gòu)的法律責(zé)任；加強(qiáng)了基礎(chǔ)資產(chǎn)、資產(chǎn)池轉(zhuǎn)移和再證券化方面的信息披露。 第三章討論上述改革對(duì)我國(guó)資產(chǎn)證券化監(jiān)管的啟示。對(duì)我國(guó)資產(chǎn)證券化監(jiān)管現(xiàn)狀的概括,缺陷是單一的資本充足率監(jiān)管無(wú)法全面防范風(fēng)險(xiǎn)；對(duì)系統(tǒng)性風(fēng)險(xiǎn)監(jiān)管缺失；對(duì)信用評(píng)級(jí)機(jī)構(gòu)的監(jiān)管制度不夠完善；資產(chǎn)證券化定量信息披露制度不健全。改革的啟示是：資本監(jiān)管方面,不僅要加強(qiáng)資本充足率監(jiān)管,還有增加杠桿率監(jiān)管；風(fēng)險(xiǎn)監(jiān)管方面,增加對(duì)系統(tǒng)性風(fēng)險(xiǎn)的監(jiān)管；完善證券化信用評(píng)級(jí)制度；加強(qiáng)對(duì)資產(chǎn)證券化信息披露的監(jiān)管力度。
[Abstract]:Starting with the analysis of the deficiencies and defects of the international regulatory system of asset securitization exposed in the financial crisis, this paper interprets the relevant revised opinions and supplementary documents issued by relevant international organizations and European and American regulators after the financial crisis. Capital adequacy regulation, systemic risk regulation, credit rating agency regulation and information disclosure regulation are reformed. Finally, combined with the current situation and defects of asset securitization supervision in China, the author emphasizes on the enlightenment of the reform of international supervision system of asset securitization to the supervision of asset securitization in China. The main content of the paper is divided into three chapters. The first chapter describes the defects of the relevant international regulatory system in the financial crisis. Firstly, the meaning and process of synthetic asset securitization, which is the inducement of the financial crisis, expands the financial risk compared with the traditional asset securitization. Secondly, the defects of the current relevant international regulatory system are insufficient attention to the new risks in the transaction of synthetic asset securitization, insufficient capital collection of assets securitization and other items; The concept of supervision does not consider the systemic risks brought about by asset securitization; it lacks the supervision of credit rating agencies; and there is no solution to the problem of information asymmetry in asset securitization. The second chapter analyzes the relevant international regulatory system reform after the financial crisis. After the financial crisis, relevant international organizations and regulatory bodies in Europe and the United States have issued revised opinions and supplementary documents on the original regulatory system of asset securitization, regulating capital adequacy and systemic risk. Credit rating agencies and information disclosure regulatory reform in four areas. It introduces the regulation standard of leverage ratio, increases the ability of risk capture, improves the design of risk weight, improves the supervision standard of capital adequacy ratio, increases macro-prudential supervision and strengthens the supervision of liquidity. It strengthens the independence and verifiability of rating activities, clarifies the legal responsibility of rating agencies, and strengthens the disclosure of basic assets, asset pool transfer and resecuritization. The third chapter discusses the above reform to our country asset securitization supervision enlightenment. The shortcomings of the supervision of asset securitization in China are that the single supervision of capital adequacy rate can not prevent risks completely, the supervision of systemic risk is absent, the supervision system of credit rating agencies is not perfect enough, and the supervision system of credit rating agencies is not perfect. Asset securitization quantitative information disclosure system is not perfect. The enlightenment of the reform is that capital supervision should not only strengthen the supervision of capital adequacy ratio, but also increase the leverage ratio, increase the supervision of systemic risk, improve the credit rating system of securitization, and improve the credit rating system of securitization. Strengthen the supervision of asset securitization information disclosure.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：吉林大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D996.2;D922.287;F832.51
本文編號(hào)：2393758
[Abstract]:Starting with the analysis of the deficiencies and defects of the international regulatory system of asset securitization exposed in the financial crisis, this paper interprets the relevant revised opinions and supplementary documents issued by relevant international organizations and European and American regulators after the financial crisis. Capital adequacy regulation, systemic risk regulation, credit rating agency regulation and information disclosure regulation are reformed. Finally, combined with the current situation and defects of asset securitization supervision in China, the author emphasizes on the enlightenment of the reform of international supervision system of asset securitization to the supervision of asset securitization in China. The main content of the paper is divided into three chapters. The first chapter describes the defects of the relevant international regulatory system in the financial crisis. Firstly, the meaning and process of synthetic asset securitization, which is the inducement of the financial crisis, expands the financial risk compared with the traditional asset securitization. Secondly, the defects of the current relevant international regulatory system are insufficient attention to the new risks in the transaction of synthetic asset securitization, insufficient capital collection of assets securitization and other items; The concept of supervision does not consider the systemic risks brought about by asset securitization; it lacks the supervision of credit rating agencies; and there is no solution to the problem of information asymmetry in asset securitization. The second chapter analyzes the relevant international regulatory system reform after the financial crisis. After the financial crisis, relevant international organizations and regulatory bodies in Europe and the United States have issued revised opinions and supplementary documents on the original regulatory system of asset securitization, regulating capital adequacy and systemic risk. Credit rating agencies and information disclosure regulatory reform in four areas. It introduces the regulation standard of leverage ratio, increases the ability of risk capture, improves the design of risk weight, improves the supervision standard of capital adequacy ratio, increases macro-prudential supervision and strengthens the supervision of liquidity. It strengthens the independence and verifiability of rating activities, clarifies the legal responsibility of rating agencies, and strengthens the disclosure of basic assets, asset pool transfer and resecuritization. The third chapter discusses the above reform to our country asset securitization supervision enlightenment. The shortcomings of the supervision of asset securitization in China are that the single supervision of capital adequacy rate can not prevent risks completely, the supervision of systemic risk is absent, the supervision system of credit rating agencies is not perfect enough, and the supervision system of credit rating agencies is not perfect. Asset securitization quantitative information disclosure system is not perfect. The enlightenment of the reform is that capital supervision should not only strengthen the supervision of capital adequacy ratio, but also increase the leverage ratio, increase the supervision of systemic risk, improve the credit rating system of securitization, and improve the credit rating system of securitization. Strengthen the supervision of asset securitization information disclosure.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：吉林大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D996.2;D922.287;F832.51
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前6條
1 張曉凌;陳華敏;;美國(guó)證券法對(duì)衍生交易市場(chǎng)風(fēng)險(xiǎn)披露的監(jiān)管及借鑒——以SEC“305規(guī)則”體制的監(jiān)管要求為視角[J];國(guó)際金融研究;2006年10期
2 高漢;;金融危機(jī)背景下的信用評(píng)級(jí)機(jī)構(gòu)監(jiān)管問(wèn)題分析——以美國(guó)信用評(píng)級(jí)機(jī)構(gòu)監(jiān)管為視角[J];河南師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2009年06期
3 郭炳南;唐海燕;;信用風(fēng)險(xiǎn)、評(píng)級(jí)機(jī)構(gòu)與金融危機(jī)的關(guān)系[J];現(xiàn)代經(jīng)濟(jì)探討;2009年03期
4 武劍;;金融危機(jī)如何檢驗(yàn)“巴塞爾新資本協(xié)議”[J];中國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)周刊;2008年48期
5 孫森;楊文彬;;金融產(chǎn)品創(chuàng)新系列講座之九 總收益互換[J];華北金融;2007年06期
6 宣昌能;王信;;金融創(chuàng)新與金融穩(wěn)定:歐美資產(chǎn)證券化模式的比較分析[J];金融研究;2009年05期
，本文編號(hào)：2393758
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/guojifa/2393758.html
最近更新
教材專(zhuān)著
