【摘要】：第二次世界大戰(zhàn)中被掠奪或被非法轉(zhuǎn)移文物的返還至今還是一個特殊的歷史遺留問題。經(jīng)過幾十年的努力,納粹掠奪藝術(shù)品必須返還給受害者已經(jīng)成為一種國際共識,歐美各國通過締結(jié)雙邊或多邊協(xié)定、制定特別立法、建立專門機(jī)構(gòu)以及司法救濟(jì)等方式,促成許多被掠藝術(shù)品返還給原所有人或合法繼承者。抗日戰(zhàn)爭是第二次世界大戰(zhàn)的有機(jī)組成部分,日本掠奪文物與納粹掠奪藝術(shù)品的做法如出一轍,國際社會在處理因納粹掠奪藝術(shù)品帶來的國際爭端方面積累的實(shí)踐和經(jīng)驗(yàn),對于亞洲國家處理被日掠奪文物的返還也具有較強(qiáng)的借鑒意義。
[Abstract]:The return of cultural relics looted or illegally transferred in World War II is still a special historical issue. After decades of efforts, it has become an international consensus that the Nazi plundered works of art must be returned to the victims. Countries in Europe and the United States have concluded bilateral or multilateral agreements, formulated special legislation, established specialized agencies, and established judicial remedies. Facilitating the return of many looted works of art to their original owners or legal successors. The War of Resistance against Japan is an integral part of the second World War, and Japan's plundering of cultural relics is the same as the Nazi's practice of pillaging works of art. The international community has accumulated practice and experience in dealing with international disputes arising from Nazi pillaging of works of art. Asian countries also have a strong reference for handling the return of cultural relics plundered by Japan.
【作者單位】： 中國人民大學(xué)法學(xué)院;
【基金】：國家社科基金項(xiàng)目“第二次世界大戰(zhàn)期間被掠文物返還的法律問題研究”(項(xiàng)目編號14BFX125)中期成果
【分類號】：D997

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 王云霞;;二戰(zhàn)被掠文物返還的法律基礎(chǔ)及相關(guān)問題[J];遼寧大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2007年04期

【共引文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 遲君輝;國際流失文化財(cái)產(chǎn)返還法律問題研究[D];華東政法大學(xué);2010年

2 汪U，

本文編號：2374150